No, the vast majority of the recommendations put forward by the Conference on the Future of Europe don’t require Treaty change.
Only 21 out 178, with <120 feasible under existing Treaties #CoFoE
cc: @suzannelynch1 @HankeVela
Only 21 out 178, with <120 feasible under existing Treaties #CoFoE
cc: @suzannelynch1 @HankeVela
2. We’ve browsed all 178, and classified them into 4 categories:
1. Recs not requiring new action (23)
2. Recs entailing new action by MS (21)
3. Recs entailing new action by EU (113)
4. Recs entailing Treaty change (21) #cofoe
1. Recs not requiring new action (23)
2. Recs entailing new action by MS (21)
3. Recs entailing new action by EU (113)
4. Recs entailing Treaty change (21) #cofoe
3. Among the 21 recs requiring Treaty Change, they call for transfer of new competences in:
1.Welfare (7)
2.Education (5)
3.Institutional reforms (4)
4.Health care (2)
5.Taxation (2)
6.Energy (1)
1.Welfare (7)
2.Education (5)
3.Institutional reforms (4)
4.Health care (2)
5.Taxation (2)
6.Energy (1)
4. This figure (21/178 recs requiring Treaty Change) falls in between the
lower figure given by a Dutch member of the plenary (10%) and the higher one given by Jourova's staff (nearly 50%). #CoFoE
lower figure given by a Dutch member of the plenary (10%) and the higher one given by Jourova's staff (nearly 50%). #CoFoE
5. The 178 recommendations are currently examined by the Plenary - mixing citizens (ambassadors of original panels) with elected decision-makers and civil society orgs.
We won’t know until next Sunday which recs will integrate the proposal to be put to political level #CoFoE
We won’t know until next Sunday which recs will integrate the proposal to be put to political level #CoFoE
For more details of our empirical study:
euractiv.com/section/future…
euractiv.com/section/future…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
