Ok. Another request, another 🧵. Today, we address the strained relationship between psychology, psychiatry and #LongCovid. Much of this may also apply to #pwME and other infection-associated chronic illnesses (h/t again @microbeminded2) and other “invisible” illnesses (1/n)
Psychology and psychiatry have a complex history with syndromic illnesses. Why? When illnesses are diagnosed on the basis of symptoms rather than “objective” tests, some clinicians will doubt the reality of the condition. Let’s start by psychoanalyzing them, shall we? (2/n)
This behavior is not justifiable, scientific or ethical. But it is also is not new: in the 1800s, tuberculosis was regarded by most physicians as the “disease of the sensitive” before tubercule bacillum was discovered, the “cancer personality” was touted for decades (3/n)
in “modern medicine”, before being famously called out by Susan Sontag in her book “AIDS and its metaphors” as she brilliantly concluded that we ‘metaphorize conditions that we do not understand’. Unfortunately this “clinical fragility” has continued into the present day (4/n)
Ask @Dysautonomia how many people with #POTS/#dysautonomia are diagnosed with anxiety prior to receiving an actual diagnosis of dysautonomia (years later)? Or how many #pwME in the #MECFS community have been actively harmed by the now-discredited-but-not-discredited enough (5/n)
“PACE trial”, which led to the famous statement that all people with #MECFS need to recover is “exercise and positive thinking”. We could go on, but suffice to say, there has been a legacy of horrific damage associated with the tendency to psychologize illnesses that are (6/n)
poorly understood on a physiological level. This is hard to recover from, and I think that #medtwitter treating #LongCovid and other infection-associated chronic illnesses need to be aware of the emotional labor they are asking of a patient when they refer to psych services (7/n)
as well as the rationale behind the referral to psych so that the person does not feel they are being “abandoned to psych” with no other treatment options being presented. With all of that said, what are some roles for psych services in #LongCovid? 1. Working through the (8/n)
emotions associated with the diagnosis of a chronic condition. FACT: #LongCovid is a highly debilitating chronic condition with (as yet) no cure. People with LC are likely to feel grief and other strongly negative emotions around this fact. Psychologists can be helpful in (9/n)
working through these emotions, assisting them with strategies for regulating these emotions (more on this later) and helping them with associated feelings of depression and anxiety that may develop in response to their diagnosis (psychiatry may be looped in here in cases (10/n)
where meds are indicated). 2. Helping people with #LongCovid navigate changes in relationships due to their diagnosis. One of the cruelest facets of #LongCovid is its ability to isolate those who live with it. Those with LC may look (mostly) like the same person, but (11/n)
they are not. One of the first things to go is socializing. For those without #LongCovid, let’s take a moment to acknowledge how stressful/draining it must be to manage 15+ intermittent, terrifying and uncontrolled symptoms whilst trying to engage in social interaction (12/n)
we can’t really ever understand, but suffice to say, most people with #LongCovid learn to avoid it right quick. There is a reason that those with #MECFS have championed the hashtag #MillionsMissing - because that is what these illnesses do: they put you on the missing list (13/n)
Families, friends, work colleagues, etc don’t understand: “you don’t *look* sick”, and this leads to near constant gaslighting. An important part of self-care in these situations is understanding that being equipped with emotion-regulation techniques in these moments can (14/n)
save you from experiencing a flare or crash as a result of the stress and emotional exertion that a negative interpersonal interaction that can bring about, which leads me over to 3) regulation, regulation, regulation: #LongCovid is indeed a condition of consequence. (15/n)
Exertion harms people with #LongCovid and exertion can take different forms: physical, cognitive and emotional, for instance. Pacing and regulation are *just as important* for your emotional labor as it is for physical and cognitive. A good psychologist can help you with (16/n)
emotion regulation strategies to help with stressors that you are hitting in your daily life that are causing setbacks for your health. Beyond these 3 main points on the role of psych services in #LongCovid care, I want to acknowledge that in very rare cases we have seen (17/n)
severe psychosis related to (we think) immune-mediated encephalitis which has required immediate and aggressive medical management, and that neuropsychologists can have an important role (re: my last thread) in assisting with #LongCovid-related cognitive dysfunction (18/n)
I also want to restate clearly that if a healthcare provider is psychologizing your #LongCovid rather than recommending psych services as *supportive care* to deal with issues that have been caused by LC, not the other way around, find a new provider ASAP. (19/n)
Finally, we must acknowledge that many cannot afford or access the psych services that they need and that is a shameful fact. To these individuals, I say embrace your community: the psychological benefits of peer support are incredibly robust and powerful. Every single day (20/n)
I feel grateful knowing that there are groups like @itsbodypolitic (and so many others!) out there who create safe and responsible spaces for people with #LongCovid to share their experiences and support one another through challenges. Please take advantage of peer (21/n)
support groups in the #LongCovid community, as there are few things more additionally damaging to a person with a chronic illness than social isolation. As always - apologies if I have left something obvious or non-obvious out of the thread. I hope this has been helpful 🙏🏻 (end)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Excited to finally get this one out in @Nature_NPJ! In the largest study of its kind to date, we used data from the @visible_health platform to answer a simple question: can we predict symptom fluctuations and crashes from both the physiological and
patient-reported data? The answer to this question is yes. Not perfectly, but actually quite well. A few important takeaways: 1) Just as we have seen previously in people living with chronic pain, the ability to predict symptom flares and crashes in ppl with #LongCOVID,
2/
#MECFS and other complex chronic illnesses can represent a massive life upgrade. The ability to prepare for or expect a crash or a bad symptom day is preferable to many than these things just seemingly randomly appearing with no warning. 2) The fact that physiological signal
3/
I want to thank everyone for the interest in this work that we completed in a #LongCOVID cohort with this novel device. I always appreciate feedback and want to thank folks for holding me accountable to a high standard of communication. To that end, I want to re-clarify this 1/
thread: this was a safety/feasibility trial which means that our primary endpoints were related to safety and feasibility. In the paper, we state clearly that we hit those endpoints: no device-related adverse events and 100% adherence to the protocol in all participants. That
2/
is great for a safety/feasibility trial. I then went on to express excitement that some cognitive scores moved. I understand that folks have (rightly) pointed out that without a larger sample size and correcting for multiple comparisons we can’t make definitive statements
3/
Excited to get this out in preprint: triple-blind, placebo-controlled microtesla magnetic therapy (MMT) is safe, feasible and effective in reducing cognitive impairment in people with #LongCOVID. I get excited about interventions for cognitive symptoms
as they can be so disabling and frightening because you don't know if the symptoms are going to be permanent. This paper makes us feel hopeful that Long COVID cognitive impairment related to neuroinflammation is something that is treatable. This was a first-in-human safety-
2/
feasibility trial. Typically in trials like this, because they haven't been done in humans and only in animals, we're happy if we see safety and good adherence to the protocol, but we're not usually expecting to see efficacy because the dosage is a bit of a "best guess". 3/
Proud to have worked with the brilliant @drmfreire on this new study looking into spike protein in #LongCOVID. The most important part of this study that doesn't just look for spike protein in folks with LC and healthy controls, but it also uses a technique called 1/
spatial transcriptomics to better understand how spike protein might be interacting with the tissue around it. Here's what is interesting about this trial: lots of gut tissue samples, in both healthy controls and #LongCOVID showed evidence of persistent spike protein. However,
2/
in the folks with #LongCOVID that persistent spike protein was causing problems in the tissue: pro-inflammatory, tissue-damaging trouble. So not only do folks with LC have more spike, but the spike is actively irritating and damaging the surrounding tissue compared to healthy
3/
Crucial paper published Friday that deserves much more attention in the #LongCOVID world: .
TLDR: 13/15 immunocompromised patients who had chronic COVID infections (>200 days) cleared the virus in under 2 weeks when given combo antivirals/monoclonals
The caveat: yes these were cancer patients who were severely immunocompromised, and the "haters" are going to say that it isn't appropriate to draw parallels between this patient group and folks with #LongCOVID.
That's incorrect.
It is perfectly acceptable to draw such
2/
parallels and here is why: we (and others) have shown over and over again that immune dysregulation is associated with #LongCOVID, and T Cell Exhaustion, specifically, is a key feature of this dysregulation (first paper here: ). Why is T Cell exhaustion
3/nature.com/articles/s4158…
Great win early in the year to receive notification that our case series looking into Dr Pridgen’s Valacyclovir, Celecoxib and Paxlovid protocol seems to really help some folks with #LongCOVID. This paper is a start, not the be-all and end-all:
It is a small, open-label case series, but there are some interesting things that are worth noting that give me hope that what we are seeing is real and will hold up in a larger trial 1) People got to choose between Val/Cel only (called ‘IMC-2’ in the paper) and Val/Cel + Pax
2/
The people who chose the latter reported greater benefit. 2) The subset of people who started with Val/Cel only but then chose to retry the protocol with Paxlovid added experienced more benefit with the three drugs together than they did with the two drugs 3) The follow-up
3/