1/While @johnkonrad is focusing on the @USNavy, let me direct the issue to the @DeptofDefense & @USDOT. Right now we are seeing falling supplies of diesel in New England & Mid-Atlantic.
Prices for gas and diesel have spiked since the #RussiaUkraineWar...
4/ This is why the US finds itself in the position of exporting and importing oil at the same time.
Much of the fracking oil cannot be refined in our current refineries, and we lack the requisite oil to refine.
We are literally shipping oil in and out.
5/This brings us to the case for @DeptofDefense and @USDOT. Numerous studies have shown that in time of war, the US lacks the requite number of tankers to support the @MSCSealift fleet of oilers for the @USNavy and land-based DOD assets.
6/Oil companies and brokers have been shifting cargoes toward Europe to fill the shortfall but also net the higher rates. This includes depleting stocks in the New England
and mid-Atlantic region. gcaptain.com/new-york-diese…
7/The latest figures from the @EIAgov show stocks dipping below the 5-year average, with the most pronounced drop in PADD1.
This drop, caused by lack of refineries, shift to fracking, the #UkraineRussiaWar & increase demand will now become the focus of the anti #JonesAct lobby.
8/The Merchant Marine Act of 1920, or the #JonesAct was the nation's first maritime strategy that stated the US shall have a merchant marine for both commerical commerce and serve as a military auxiliary.
9/Much like they did when @Colpipe experienced their shutdown due to a ransomware attack, the large oil companies and their lobbyists will scream for a waiver of Sec 27 of the #JonesAct.
10/As before, the need for a waiver is both wrong but endangers national security.
First, the issue was not caused by the requirement to ship cargo between US ports on US-flagged, owned, built & crewed ships; which is the relevant section of the MMA 1920. seahistory.org/wp-content/upl…
11/Second, unlike what the oil companies and their lobbyists will say, there are available US tankers to move diesel from the Gulf of Mexico to the East Coast.
Third, rates for US tankers are less, perhaps $65k/day versus $85 for foreign.
12/Fourth the charter costs to haul diesel from the Gulf of Mexico to East Coast is a short duration charter (a few days) vice weeks for trans-ocean. Tankers are only paid when they have cargo onboard, so they have to make money while hauling.
13/Signing a waiver to allow foreign-flag tankers to haul fuel between US ports jeopardize the the US-flag fleet.
With the closing of the #RedHill fuel facility in Hawai'i , @INDOPACOM ability to support operations across the Pacific is jeopardiazed.
14/This closure and issues with the size and composition of the @USNavy battle force, along with the limited number of underway replenishment ships available from @MSCSealift, means the reliance on commercial US tankers is increasing.
16/Attacks on the US merchant marine, which is what the oil companies and their lobbyists are preparing to do, has a direct impact on the nation's national security, both overseas and domestic. There needs to be reform of US maritime legislation.
17/Too long, @POTUS, the US Congress, the @DeptofDefense and @USDOT have ignored and allowed the US merchant marine and maritime sector to decline to the detriment of US shipbuilding base and @USNavy.
1/@johnkonrad had this latest post that dealt with the issue of Ukraine closing several shipping routes out of the ports of Izmail and Reni on the Danube due to mines reported in the Gulf of #Odesa due to escalation in mining during the #UkraineRussiaWar.
2/One of the issues raised by @johnkonrad and myself is the role of @NATO_MARCOM in the #BlackSea to protect shipping flagged and owned by @nato countries. We had numerous early incidents of ships being targeted and even used by Russia as a shield.
3/While most attention was drawn to the fight for Kyiv, the Russians aimed to form the land bridge from Crimea to Donbas, secure the Sea of Azov & blockade the Ukrainian coast. This has led to the dozen of ships and hundreds of mariners being trapped.
The purchase of two 24yr old ro/ros does not negate the loss of 3 LMSRs & 3 ex-MPS...
2/Even the creation of the Tanker Security Program with the intent of flagging in 10 tankers and the Maritime Security Program of 60 ships is a band-aid on the problem and does nothing to stimulate ship construction or infrastructure development.
3/The reason that the @USNavy is floundering, is the same thing that the #sealift fleet is sinking - the lack of investment in our maritime infrastructure in both military and civilian ship construction.
@robertcobrien 1/Since the US govt stopped supporting the merchant marine - end of differentials & the idea we can rely on efrective US control/allied merchant fleets - we have allowed the maritime infrastructure of the US to decay. Without commercial building, military suffers...
@robertcobrien 2/We need to look at how China, Korea and Japan operate their shipyards. They are able to not only produce top of the line navies, but build 93% of the world's merchant fleets. Stop looking at the PLAN and look at China Shipbuilding Industry, Mitsubishi, Hyundai, CSSC, STX...
@robertcobrien 3/DSME, Samsung & Imabari. These yards build both commercial and naval ships.
We need to look not only at the shipbuilding process, but the management, resourcing, and financing of ships.
2/@USNavy, that operates completely unarmed underway replenishment ships under @MSCSealift, with commercial merchant mariners, now wants to place VLS on board to offset the loss of cells from decommissioned cruisers.
This is notwithstanding the current condition of the fleet.
3/I usually do not usually differ with @RepElaineLuria, but on this one - while agree it could be done - I dont think they should.
The concept of arming a cargo ship is even worse. First, we don't have enough for our #sealift mission. Second, what is the status of the mariners?
1/Some photos from today of #EverForward. A view of her shows her bow is almost 4 meters (13 feet) out of the water. She is 17 to 24 feet of water and draws 42 feet.
This is is going to be a prolonged salvage to get her off.
2/She missed her southbound turn (unknown why) and went out of Craighill Channel - dredged from 38 to 50 feet to accommodate neo-Panamax ships like #EverForward.
She departed the channel between red buoys 16 & 14 and plowed into the spoil area from the dredging; about 24 ft.
3/Unlike her larger cousin #EverGiven (400m in length and 20,000 TEUs), which grounded at her bow and stern in the Suez last year, #EverForward (334m & 12,000 TEUs) is aground from bow to stern as demonstrated by her exposed bottom fore and aft.