The @nytimes is memorializing one million US #COVID19 deaths with a feature that combines excellent graphics with dishonest and cynical commentary. An opening section headline reads: "At the start of the pandemic, few understood how high the death toll might climb." False! 1/
Epidemiologists had been warning for years of the potentially devastating consequences of a pandemic. As early as January 2020, there was sufficient information available to know that the spread of #SARSCoV2 would exact a terrible human toll. 2/
On Jan 25, 2020, when only 2 cases had been reported in the US, the WSWS warned "that there are no coordinated global mechanisms in place to cope with a health crisis that could easily spiral out of the control of authorities, placing the lives of countless people in danger." 3/
Responding to claims that #COVID19 was a threat to "only" third world countries, the WSWS wrote on Jan 31, 2020 that poverty and a for-profit health system made the US highly vulnerable to a disastrous spread of the virus. 4/
We wrote, "Tens of millions of people live in extreme poverty and lack any health insurance... If several thousand patients sought treatment at the same time for severe respiratory illnesses in a major American city, it would completely overwhelm the medical system." 5/
Claiming to explain "How America Lost One Million People," the NY Times conceals the economic interests responsible for the massive US death toll. It writes: "Experts say deaths were all but inevitable from a new virus of such severity and transmissibility." False! 6/
In fact, at least 90-95% of the deaths in the US could have been avoided if the appropriate public health measures had been implemented to stop viral transmission. China's #ZeroCovid policies have kept their death toll well below 10,000. 7/
The NY Times, which regularly demands that China abandon ZeroCovid, fails to acknowledge that it played a central role in opposing public health measures, such as lock-downs and school closures, because they harmed the economy. 8/
Denouncing lockdowns, columnist Thomas Friedman wrote on March 22, 2020: “Wait a minute! What the hell are we doing to ourselves? To our economy? To our next generation? Is this cure — even for a short while — worse than the disease?’’ 9/
The devastating impact of the virus in the United States and globally is the consequence of the brutal subordination life and health to the capitalist drive for profits and the accumulation of massive personal wealth. 10/
Prime Minister #ScottMorrison has declared that the establishment of a Chinese naval base in the #SolomonIslands would be crossing a "red Line" for Australia. “We won’t be having Chinese military naval bases in our region on our doorstep.” 1/ thehill.com/policy/interna…
But how does Morrison's declaration, backed by the US, square with the US-NATO insistence that #Ukraine has an absolute and non-negotiable right to join its military alliance, regardless of Russia's objections? 2/
Morrison considers the Solomon Islands to be on the "doorstep" of Australia. Honiara, the capital of the Islands, is separated from Sydney by 2,858 kilometers of ocean water. That's a pretty big doorstep! 3/
This article, posted today on-line and printed in the NY Times Sunday Magazine, is yet another deplorable example of Professor Timothy Snyder's role as a historical falsifier and apologist for Ukrainian fascism. 1/
Snyder mockingly dismisses Russian references to Ukrainian nationalists' mass murder of Poles and Jews during World War II as "a past that never happened" and "nonsensical and necrophiliac accounts of history." 2/
But at an earlier stage of his career, Snyder wrote detailed accounts of the genocidal activities of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN). His article, "The Causes of Ukrainian-Polish Ethnic Cleansing 1943," appeared in the May 2003 edition of Past and Present. 3/
The massive US-NATO arms shipments to #Ukraine️ are based on dangerous assumptions in Washington. The FT writes that the Biden administration's previous concerns about Russian retaliation "has been all but discarded." 1/ #UkraineRussiaWar
According to the FT: "There has also been a reassessment of the threat posed by Russia's nuclear arsenal, a sabre that Putin rattled early in the war but which analysts now believe he is unlikely to deploy." On what is this assumption based? What if they are wrong? 2/
Boasting publicly about the Javelin missiles and other advanced weaponry the US and NATO are pouring into Ukraine, Biden is either assuming that Russia won't attack the convoys or, more likely, is actually seeking to provoke an attack. In either case, he is acting recklessly. 3/
Within weeks of the US invasion of Iraq in March 2003, it became clear that the claim that Saddam Hussein's had developed weapons of mass destruction -- the critical justification of the war -- was a lie that had been concocted by the Bush administration. 1/ #Propaganda
The #NYTimes, which had propagated the WMD lies, manufactured, ex post facto, another justification for the war. On April 25, 2003, it published a front page photo of a skull, which it claimed was of a political prisoner murdered by the Iraqi regime. 2/
Two days later, on April 27, Thomas L. Friedman wrote a column titled, "The Meaning of a Skull." He claimed that the discovery of the skull rendered the issue of WMDs irrelevant. 3/
In the aftermath of World War I, there was extensive study of the immense role of #Propaganda in the mobilization of public support during four years of bloody conflict. It was recognized that all the conflicting states made use of propaganda. 1/ #Ukraine
The British sociologist Harold Lasswell's 1927 book, "Propaganda Technique in World War I", described propaganda as the "means of converting masses of people to desired view points," making use of "stories, rumors, reports, pictures and other forms of social communication." 2/
In an article entitled "World Propaganda War," published in The North American Review just 5 years before the outbreak of World War II, writer William E. Berchtold warned: 3/
Thomas Friedman's commentary on Ukraine continues a 30-year pattern of lying justifications for US imperialism. Back in 2003, after it became clear that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, Friedman concocted the claim that the evidence had been "scattered." 1/
He also attempted to shift attention away from non-existing WMDs, claiming that the US invasion was a necessary response to atrocities allegedly committed by Saddam Hussein. He wrote on Many 14, 2003: 2/
"So just as it is becoming...clear that many weapons sites -- including nuclear research sites -- which might have proved that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, have been looted and the evidence scattered, the same is happening with sites of his human mass destruction." 3/