1/This thread on an obscure committee nominally responsible for directing a beloved #EastBoston park is this week's essential #bospoli reading. Meet me back here when you're done for a few more thoughts from someone who has been following this fiasco closely for the past 10 yrs
2/ For context, here's the finished portion of Piers Park. I live around the corner, walk past it every day, and visit as often as possible. It"s a treasure, one of New England's beautiful spaces. The angry racists you've just seen in those videos are tasked with managing it.
3/ Piers Park is an amazing place for working people of limited means to have parties, get married, shoot music videos, take family photos, and hear great music. Like my band, @hightiderocks! Here we are playing some Dead on Jerry Garcia's birthday
4/ Anyway, the reason all of this matters is that for reasons that would take 20 more tweets to explain this incredible public space is about to be more than doubled. It's going to be the best waterfront park in New England. It's huge, not just for us in Beastie but all of Boston
5/ The Piers Park Advisory Committee was set up by statute to give concerned residents a chance to manage the existing park and guide the planning of the rest.
But not residents of #EastBoston: residents of the entire Commonwealth. This committee has taken that joke way too far
6/ my friend @BrianGBoston started putting it in my ear more than a decade ago that this committee was not only useless, but openly racist and enforcing an outdated vision of this neighborhood w/no understanding of who actually lives here now and what they need from their parks
7/ I've attended at least 5 meetings of this committee, and it's all true. They were doing nothing, and doing it badly. I was once shouted at by nearly every sitting member of the board during a public Q+A, told to sit down just for asking if I could see a financial statement
8/ I personally visited the AG's office to check the committee's financial statements filings after that meeting.
There weren't any, for at least ten years.
This alone should have had them shut down tbh
9/ But what we're talking about here is much more important than paperwork. It's about a battle for the soul of a neighborhood in which power was held until recently a small group of 2nd-gen Americans who (quietly or otherwise) don't want Latinos in "their" immigrant neighborhood
10/ In "Common Ground," the single best read on the Boston busing crisis, J. Anthony Lukas points out that Eastie was the only place where the opposition to busing was openly racist. That is the climate the committee you see in that video grew up in
11/ Eastie busing activist Pixie Palladino made a name for herself by screaming racial slurs at kids (also punching Ted Kennedy in the stomach) while training the next generation of Eastie leaders
Her memory is now honored with a bench in Piers Park, commissioned by you know who
12/ which brings us up to this clip: a former city councilor (+ former Palladino mentee) calling this committee out for resisting neighborhood demands that they diversify + start listening to actual residents and noisily resigning. Good on ya, Sal!
13/ I'm really burning the lede here though! Here's the real story:
I admit that I gave up on trying to do anything about this neighborhood embarrassment years ago. But you know who didn't? A new generation of Easier leaders organized by @realgaraad who kept the heat on
14/ The board is still holding on to their power after this absurd coup, but given the neighborhood's open disgust for these out-of-towners and the massive response to @PodikoEastie's thread I can't think they can keep treating this as a do-nothing social club for much longer
Deeply embarrassed to tell you that for all of this time I have gotten the name wrong! It's the PROJECT Advisory Committee. I'm sure I knew that
(N.B. : the *organized* opposition to busing! It was super racist all over the city, and from what I"ve read Charlestown was much worse on the ground)
15/ 1 more important point: Piers Park was given to Eastie by @massport in mitigation for the wanton destruction of Wood Island Park and an adjacent neighborhood. We're high density. Parks matter.
I'll give the last word here to local saint Mary Ellen Welch (RIP)
I've always said that ICE's lawless excesses would inevitably become too big for Americans to ignore, and while that day may not be here yet this report should get us there a little faster. This goes *so* far beyond immigration enforcement
You should already care that ICE constantly lies to the public and the courts about the people it rips from their families, detains in terrible conditions, and violently deports. But a lot of US citizens don't + never will, so let's say you're one of them. This report is for you
Read this paragraph, and then read it again, and then read it out loud to someone nearby and start a conversation about why an immigration agency has any right to conduct warrantless surveillance on all of us in the course of enforcing non-criminal statutes
It's good to have everyone see what honest lawyers always knew: #SCOTUS decisions are historically unmoored from compelling arguments, "Constitutional reasoning," or much more than the will of the majority voting block.
Wtf else did you think "substantive due process" ever was?
Originalism, textualism, balancing tests, the "reasonable man," strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, "penumbras" of rights--it's all made up, folks
Bill Douglas scrawled opinions out on airline cocktail napkins, Scalia had his seances with Thomas Jefferson, Kavanaugh I assume drinks beer until it makes sense
1/ Marriage should be a two-year initial contract, renewable at the joint option of the parties for whatever period of time they choose with a default renewal period of five years the first time and ten each subsequent renewal
2/ If the parties are in the minority of humanity who can realistically commit to sexual monogamy for life that can be specified as a term of the contract, subject to amendment at the parties' joint option at any time
3/ (and for those who think I'm being too transactional about this the current model is already a legally binding contract)
Hey #immigrationtwitter, quick question live from USCIS Lawrence: what is a "reasonable period of time"? 5 mins? 25? We're going on 30
Interviewer has refused to interview my client on the actual subject of the interview we are here for, relying on absurdly bad prior findings without giving us a chance to (1) see the report they were based on or (2) offer any testimony to address USCIS's hearsay summary of them
Interviewer is also using entirely the wrong legal standard, shifting the burden to someone who has nothing to do with the allegations--but that hardly even seems like the point anymore after watching my clients being treated the way they just were
1/ The current 10+ month delay to process and issue basic 1-yr immigrant work permits (EADs) suggests a part of the system which should be not reformed or made more efficient, but abolished. Your EAD should come stapled to a qualifying application's filing receipt, full stop.
2/ An EAD currently issues when applicants have demonstrated (1) ID + (2) that they have a qualifying application (eg permanent residency) pending which meets the basic eligibility requirements for that application. What if #2 were "has paid the filing fee for that application"?
3/ sure you'd get some frivolous filers totally unqualified for the application they are filing desperate to score a 1-yr EAD + the rights to work/drive which come with it. But there are ways to screen for totally bogus filings w/out the totally unacceptable backlogs we now have
the fake German heiress from the Netflix show also tried to seek #asylum in the US from an EU member state based on the inconvenience that might result from ppl knowing she was a fake German heiress, which feels like it should have been more of a story all around
Inventing Anna('s Particular Social Group)
(just a little asylum humor there, don't mind me)
Anyway if you agree with Jeff Sessions that my clients fleeing torture and death at the hands of Central American gangs are abusing the system when they apply for asylum, pls accept this as a helpful example of what abusing the system looks like