After the Arab conquest of Iran in the 7th century CE, namāz came to be used as a Persian equivalent of the Arabic salat.
7/12
By the eleventh and twelfth centuries Persian poets like Farrukhi Sistani (1000-1040) and Khaqani Shirvani (c. 1120 – c. 1199) were using expressions like panj namāz (five prayers) in their poems.
8/12
Namāz and salat came to be used interchangeably in the Persian translations and exegesis of the Qur’an.
Check out Travis Zadeh's wonderful book, "The Vernacular Qur'an" if you're interested.
By the time Muhammad Quli Qutub Shah (1565-1612), the fifth king of the Qutub Shahi dynasty in India used namāz in his poems in a language that would later become Urdu, the usage of the word in the sense of five daily prayers was firmly established.
10/12
In contemporary Persian, namāz is also used in a generic sense of worship in religions like Christianity and Judaism.
But in Urdu it specifically means the five daily prayers of (South Asian) Muslims.
11/12
This thread was brought to you with the help of Daniel Sheffield who is a professor of medieval and early modern Persian-speaking world at Princeton.
Thanks for reading!
12/12
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
ChatGPT, Claude, Google Gemini — which app responds best to long prompts for academic purposes:
(Results are a bit surprising.)
---
I wrote a long prompt to categorize how relevant a given paper is to my current project.
Complete prompt in the next tweet.
Here's the complete prompt. Feel free to customize it according to your project.
You are a highly specialized AI tool called Paper Relevance Advisor. Your purpose is to help scholars working on a project [details about your project]. Reliability and accuracy of information are paramount, so avoid citing any fake references.
I will provide you with the text of a research paper. Please carefully read the entire paper and evaluate its relevance to the project on [project title].
First, write your reasoning for how relevant the paper is to the project inside **Reasoning** tags. Consider factors such as:
- Does the paper directly discuss [important details about the project]?
- Does it cover the [details about the project]?
- Is it focused on the time period [relevant to the project]?
- Even if not directly related, does it contain any theoretical or methodological insights that could be extrapolated to the project?
After providing your reasoning, categorize the relevance of the paper into one of the following categories:
1. Must Read: Papers that are very relevant to the current project on [project details]. Not including these papers may have an adverse effect on academic rigor of the project.
2. Scan and Skim: Papers that may be relevant to the current project on [project details]. These are the papers that if cited in the project will make it impressive but not citing them will not damage the core argument.
3. Read If Time Allows: Papers that are not directly relevant to the current project but may contain some theoretical or methodological insights that can be extrapolated.
4. Don't Read: Papers that are totally irrelevant to the current project and contribute nothing to it.
Output your recommendation like this:
Recommendation:
I opened a new chat in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and ran this prompt.
All three apps said they understood the instructions.
Claude's response was a bit detailed compared to the other two.
1. What is "Active" Reading and Why You Should Do It 2. What is a Zero Draft and Why You Should Write One 3. How to Write a Perfect First Draft 4. How to Revise a First Draft 5. Who is the Ideal Reader