#BlackLivesMatter put a much-needed spotlight on systemic racism against Black people. Yet, public support has been mixed & dwindling over time.

We investigated the determinants of BLM support (with @Tamara_Marques_ @LeticiaRMicheli).

#openaccess

🧵

doi.org/10.1017/S15375… Abstract of the paper "...Police brutality against Bl...
Our goals were to uncover main themes in the published literature, consolidate research findings & other available evidence (surveys, polls), pit predictors of BLM against one another, & explore differences across societal groups.

See alt-text for + info

doi.org/10.1017/S15375… The Research Goals & Contri...
In a systematic review, we identified 4 major themes in the literature:

1. Impacts of racial violence
2. Characteristics of BLM & public image
3. Influence of news media on public support
4. Supporters' political & psychological profiles

alt-text info👀

doi.org/10.1017/S15375… Description of 4 major them...
We consolidated empirical findings & clustered them into 5 categories:

1. Demographics
2. Race & Ethnicity
3. Partisanship & Ideology
4. Discrimination & Prejudice
5. Social Attitudes & Psychology

Blue: support | Red: lack of | Purple: non-significant.

doi.org/10.1017/S15375… The figure describes the 17...
Demographics were often inconsistent predictors of BLM support across studies while race/ethnicity, partisanship, and ideology were more reliable determinants of BLM endorsement.

This means whites, Republicans, & Conservatives typically opposed BLM.

doi.org/10.1017/S15375… Urbanicity as predictor of ...Race and Ethnicity as predi...Partisanship & Ideology as ...
When it comes to psychology, low social dominance orientation, prejudice, and authoritarianism are all consistently associated with BLM support, as is positive intergroup contact, empathy for protestors, and acknowledging blacks are discriminated against.

doi.org/10.1017/S15375… Experience Discrimination a...
We then conducted a systematic multiple meta-analyses with 13 public opinion datasets (N=31,779) employing @RoperCenter to confirm the patterns found in the literature review & explore a wider range of predictors of BLM support.

See article/alt for deets

doi.org/10.1017/S15375… We conducted a Systematic D...
Results corroborate the lit review: BLM support is negatively associated with age, being white, Republican, and conservative, and positively related with being female, African American, & believing Blacks experience police violence & discrimination.

doi.org/10.1017/S15375… Results of Multiple Meta-an...
In addition, voting behavior and political attitudes display some of the largest effects.

In line with the "Great Replacement" theory, negative racial and immigrant attitudes are strongly related to BLM.

(See alt-text & also doi.org/10.1037/cou000…)

doi.org/10.1017/S15375… Voting intention for the Re...
We explored differences in how sociopolitical cleavages may shape support for BLM.

Ideology cleaves support for BLM the most followed by party identification and race & ethnicity.

doi.org/10.1017/S15375… Subgroup Analyses  Results ...
We assessed which predictors are comparatively stronger (& robust to controls). In a multivariate setting, ideology (1st) and party identification (2nd) have the largest, most robust effect sizes, followed by race (Blacks versus others) and gender.

doi.org/10.1017/S15375… Relative proportion of sign...
Overall, 27 predictors were significantly related to BLM support controlling for other variables at least once, suggesting BLM in America is a complex, multifaceted issue influenced by various competing and intersectional factors.

doi.org/10.1017/S15375… Plot of Standardized regres...
Concluding, there is a near-perfect correspondence between opposition to BLM and positive attitudes towards American institutions that are deeply rooted in systemic racism (e.g., the police, Republican Party, Conservatism).

doi.org/10.1017/S15375… BLM demonstrations rose aga...
Academically, we argue for greater appreciation of ideology in contemporary politics & contend that ideology matters as it underlies the legitimation of inequality & desire for societal change. Its inclusion in models of collective action is paramount.

doi.org/10.1017/S15375…
On a personal note, we initiated this project in the aftermath of George Floyd's murder, to whom we dedicate this work. While this is an infinitely small contribution, we hope it advances the pursuit of racial equality & helps dismantle white supremacy.

doi.org/10.1017/S15375…
We would like to thank @bensaun @ntdPhD @Sam_D_Parsons @lmaia @LauritsBromme & @JohnJost1 for helpful comments as well as the editors @blackbruin Michael Bernhard @Boylan_Jen for their invaluable support at @PoPpublicsphere @CambridgeUP @APSAtweets.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Flavio Azevedo 🇧🇷 #BlackLivesMatter

Flavio Azevedo 🇧🇷 #BlackLivesMatter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Flavio_Azevedo_

Jun 8
Have you ever wished to have access to 51,404 observations from 69 countries (28 nationally representative samples) from Global North/South to analyze & study the social & moral psychology of #COVID19?

#OpenScience for the win!

Preprint & Materials: doi.org/10.31234/osf.i…

🧵 World map showing the sampl...All moral and social psycho...Abstract of our paper on th...Correlation matrices for su...
As part of the ICSMP (icsmp-covid19.netlify.app), we wrote a paper describing our survey methodology, sharing survey materials, raw/cleaned data, code & translations (osf.io/tfsza/) & data visualization interface/Shiny app: icsmp.shinyapps.io/icsmp_covid19/

doi.org/10.31234/osf.i… Authors list of ICSMP data ...Authors list of ICSMP data ...A screenshot of the ICSMP d...A screenshot of the ICSMP d...
In our reproducible report, we share code for all our plots & tables hoping it can serve as an open resource for research and education #OpenData #OER

flavioazevedo.com/stats-and-r-bl…

doi.org/10.31234/osf.i… Graph depicting cross-cultu...Graph depicting cross-cultu...Graph depicting cross-cultu...A table showing sample size...
Read 12 tweets
Mar 5, 2019
Thank you, @NathanKalmoe, for once more engaging with our work. I feel privileged to have the opportunity to discuss how both of our works differ/intersect. As you invited and welcomed my retorque, here are some additional thoughts.

(1/gazillion)
I say additional because there was a thread of this article's findings:


And a first pass on a few topics here with @ChrisPolPsych @ntdPhD
In this iteration, you focused on samples, distributions, sophistication measures and interpretation. While the latter is always somewhat subjective, I see the remaining points as issues which are worth debating, and whose intricacies may be elucidating to the differences found:
Read 25 tweets
Feb 23, 2019
🔥off the press 🔥

Colleagues and I tackle admittedly contentious debates in ideology scholarship: ideological innocence, nexus between ideology’s most commonly theorized sub-structures (social & economic), and ideological asymmetries of PolPsy (via NeoLib).

Highlights below:
Using a set of high quality nationally representative surveys from professional survey companies (SSI/Research Now/YouGov), in the US and UK, & in which a greater number and range of ideological instruments and psychological constructs were administered, we demonstrated that >>>
1.) contrary to the ideological innocence (K&K) hypothesis, dating back to Converse (1964), *at least as of 2016*, we observed a surprisingly high degree of ideological coherence, when using both operational and symbolic ideological instruments.
Read 29 tweets
Jun 21, 2018
Proud to see published my first #openscience, collaborative and cumulative science project with great collaborators @jakewomick, @TobiasRothmund, @KinglaKing, and @JohnJost1.

A perfect start to #SIPS2018 in just a few days!

journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.117… #SPPS

Thread alert (1/12)
Methodologically, this work adds to the existing literature in a few meaningful ways. We used facets of established constructs to gain a more precise understanding of the psychological underpinnings of Trump supporters (2/12)
We analyzed psychological differences between politically relevant groups in the 2016 Election: Democrats, Republicans, and Trumpists in both primaries and general election. (3/12)
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(