In a dramatic escalation last night and thanks to the European judges intervention, the scheduled flight has been cancelled only minutes before takeoff
But the Uk government is undeterred and will appeal against the European Court ruling. news.sky.com/story/minister…
The ECHR intervention is already bein framed by some Conservative MPs as 'unacceptable interference' by foreign judges in domestic matters, and is fuelling their long-standing hostility towards the European Court politicshome.com/thehouse/artic…
And Boris Johnson yesterday has refused to rule out withdrawing from European Convention on Human Rights, stating that the Uk government 'may very well' have to change laws on deporting asylum seekers
But, as noted by @AmnestyUK, "any future decision by the UK to withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights could be a violation of the human rights guarantees in the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement" and would therefore impact on peace in NI amnesty.org.uk/press-releases…
The matter will likely be discussed at #PMQs later today.
For context, here's an excellent reminder of what Boris Johnson thought of the ECHR in 2016
#LordGeidt: Downing Street is under pressure to make public why Boris Johnson's ethics adviser has quit - as the government faces an urgent question in the Commons over his exit.
It was also reported that two last-ditch attempts to halt the flight had been rejected, with the Home Office admitting that there is a risk the flight could be cancelled anyway, after legal challenges meant that fewer than 10 people are expected to board
A source told Playbook that, due to individual case challenges brought against the government, “just seven” people were due to board, and that an ongoing “legal merry go-round” could well mean the “removal of every single last person” from the flight.
.@allthecitizens spoke with @rebecca_vincent, Director of Operations and Campaigns at @RSF_inter, who were present at the proceedings throughout and have supported Carole in her campaign.
“This will prove to be a landmark case for the public interest defence in the UK.’
“it was clear Carole was targeted for her public interest reporting, this was a clear attempt to use the law to silence Carole, to discredit her, to isolate her, and to make a clear example of her, to show others the possible consequences for reporting on certain topics”
The multimillionaire Brexit backer Arron Banks has lost his libel action against the Observer and Guardian journalist Carole Cadwalladr, which was criticised as an attack on free speech. theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/j…
Cadwalladr said on Monday morning: “I am so profoundly grateful & relieved. Thank you to the judge, my stellar legal team and the 29,000 people who contributed to my legal defence fund. I literally couldn’t have done it without you.” pressgazette.co.uk/carole-cadwall…