Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Jun 16, 2022 9 tweets 6 min read Read on X
If you're wondering why so many Bat coronaviruses seem to emerge from one research group in China, this paper provides a clue.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26920708/

It involves our usual friends... and a "novel" bat coronavirus called 4991 Image
There is just a little itty bit of a problem.
In "discovering" Bat Cov-4991 they didn't actually discover a virus.
More likely, they made one. Image
You see, they published complete gene sequences of the "bat viruses" in their paper, including spike sequences.

But not 4991.
Oh no, they didn't happen to have the complete sequence of that one. Just the RdRp.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KU3432…

@Daoyu15 ImageImage
So it seems likely that the only reason that 4991 exists (well the RdRp only) is to form a cover for a manufactured coronavirus. There is no other explanation. No more of the genome of this exists.

(24 hr link blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?CMD=…) ImageImage
What drew my attention to this?
Well 4991 was used by certain members of #DRASTIC to publish a paper that promoted the assumption that #RaTG13 was real. It isn't.

So why promote the idea?
blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?CMD=…
#RaTG13 was touted as the precursor of #SARSCoV2 but it is fake. It didn't appear in Genbank until after SC2. It doesn't appear in ANY research papers before SC2.

Anybody promoting RaTG13 as real is acting to protect the makers of the #covid19 virus.
Which suggests to me that the authors - who seem very close - are promoting a narrative of deflection.

Of course, I might be wrong. Image
There are many write-ups on the fakery of RaTG13 - including from our very own favourite @Daoyu15 but this one is relatively easy to read.

nerdhaspower.weebly.com/ratg13-is-fake… Image
And just to clarify, I am not claiming that 4991 is fake. Quite to the contrary. I am claiming it was one of many attempts to make viral subgenomes by the WIV in preparation for the "big one".

So I'll leave it there.
@jjcouey @CharlesRixey feel free to disagree, this is science

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Jul 14
Just a reminder that Sam Neill had exactly the same "rare" T-cell lymphoma that Michel Goldman developed after his COVID vaccines.

Goldman published his own case report. After the backlash he was forced to falsely claim that the vaccines "had saved millions" - yet he stopped taking the COVID vaccines that gave him lymphoma and he is still alive.

Sam Neill's death is being weaponised by vested interests to claim that the experimental CAR-T gene therapy that was used for him "worked".

If you see someone claiming that CAR-T therapy "works" remember to ask them whether they have vested interests in it. Most media accounts that are pushing it do. It is a high risk gene therapy that has no proven and verified success in the treatment of cancers.

Meanwhile it is also important to remember that these very lymphomas were predicted to be a consequence of spike producing vaccines - because independent research showed it. But that research was quashed by the @NIH. People died as a consequence and are still dying.

RIP Sam Neill. We tried.

@JesslovesMJK @Fynnderella1 @RWMaloneMD @stkirsch @AaronSiriSG @Kevin_McKernan @BrokenTruthTV

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34901098/Image
Michel Goldman and the p53 lymphoma scandal in context:

arkmedic.info/p/philadelphia…
The only journalist who was prepared to cover this story is @BrokenTruthTV

He is still waiting for the @NIH to release the 490 pages of emails that they refused to release that contained information on the suppression of this scandal.

#NIHgate
brokentruth.tv/p/nihgate
Read 5 tweets
Jul 10
I was taught for years that @DrAndyWakefield had committed fraud - it was not true.

His prior paper - written with @PeterDaszak - showed that measles virus was a contributor to Crohn's.

The Lancet paper showed that bowel disease was a feature of severe disability after vaccination.

Wakefield had to be destroyed to protect the vaccine industry or it would have collapsed in 1998.

That is how the pharma industry works, but they can't do it alone.

In the case of the Wakefield saga, they were aided by the @bmj_latest who commissioned Brian Deer to fabricate a fake story about "fraud" because they were being paid by GSK and Merck - the very vaccine makers who stood to be eviscerated by the truth about their product's safety.

All this is documented (thread below).

The children in the paper were permanently disabled by the MMR vaccine and never, ever, got recognition. They are on track to die without ever having their vaccine disability recognised.

This is the worst travesty of the medical industry ever committed - because it was done for money.

@MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @PGtzsche1 @AaronSiriSG @stkirsch @RWMaloneMD @Fynnderella1
Measles and Crohn's disease - Daszak and Wakefield.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9215145/
Measles vaccine is live measles virus.
arkmedic.info/p/would-you-li…
Read 8 tweets
Jun 18
This is a false statement by omission.

It should say that cervical cancer deaths fell to zero in young women irrespective of vaccination status.

That is multifactorial due to change in screening and under-age sexual activity in the UK.

No RCT has shown a reduction in cancer
Teenage pregnancies are a surrogate for underage sexual activity (which drives cervical cancer rates in the under 25s). In the UK they fell off a cliff in 2007 - the year the iphone came out and the HPV vaccine rollout started.

At the same time there was a large rise in cervical cancer incidence in the older age group who were given the HPV vaccine in the "catch up" program.

It is a fallacy to say that it only works in underage girls.

Read 6 tweets
May 12
Absolutely not @quay_dr.

The "Swiss patient" sequence you provided not only has 2% dissimilarity from any known hanta sequence but BLASTing into the patent database gets us here.

"No name" virus.
Really?

The people running the @DeptofWar need to start going to jail.

@JesslovesMJK @Kevin_McKernan @open_vaet @Fynnderella1 @AGHuff @RepThomasMassie @BlackTomThePyr8 @FeeRedfern @artisbrutal2021Image
Image
Oof.. Jay Hooper
USAMRIID.



@FeeRedfern @RWMaloneMD @JesslovesMJK @carl_jurassic @open_vaet
@FeeRedfern @RWMaloneMD @JesslovesMJK @carl_jurassic @open_vaet Oh what a pretzel we weave when we try to deceive...

x.com/i/grok/share/d…Image
Read 4 tweets
Feb 23
💥BOOM 💥
This post attracted hundreds of abusive pharma trolls, including an attempt to community note the post.

It was just a reply to another post and got over 1000 likes but 100s of trolls.

Why?

I am going to tell you in the next post. And it will shake your world.
You were lied to about the Merck measles vaccine develop in the 60s. When injected into babies it caused fevers, rashes, diarrhoea and febrile convulsions.

Why?

I'm going to show you.
@SecKennedy @RetsefL @MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @RWMaloneMD
Merck claimed that the "measles vaccine" was an "attenuated version of measles" giving the impression that it was a virus that was made safe.

That was a lie.

It was just measles, passaged in cells in a lab.

We injected our babies with actual measles.
How do I know?
Read 11 tweets
Feb 10
💥💥💥BOOM💥💥💥

Recently released Australian Road Deaths data confirm that the @epiphare study claiming that COVID vaccination reduced road deaths by 32% was, as suspected, a complete fake.

See next tweet for the analysis and sources.
Paper: jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman… x.com/sudokuvariante…https://www.bitre.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/road-trauma-australia-2024.pdf
Here are the actual road deaths data plotted from the Australian BITRE data repository using a trendline for 2000-2019 (excluding 2020 as it was a quiet year)

The pink area shows the inflection and increase in road deaths over the predicted number.

Note that road deaths have a downward trend despite an increase in population (due to safety measures and slowing of traffic).Image
So the question becomes...
"what is the probability that - if the @epiphare study was real (showing a 32% reduction in road deaths after vaccination) - the Australian road deaths (where nearly 100% of the adult population was vaccinated) would increase by 36%"?
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(