Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Jun 16, 2022 9 tweets 6 min read Read on X
If you're wondering why so many Bat coronaviruses seem to emerge from one research group in China, this paper provides a clue.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26920708/

It involves our usual friends... and a "novel" bat coronavirus called 4991 Image
There is just a little itty bit of a problem.
In "discovering" Bat Cov-4991 they didn't actually discover a virus.
More likely, they made one. Image
You see, they published complete gene sequences of the "bat viruses" in their paper, including spike sequences.

But not 4991.
Oh no, they didn't happen to have the complete sequence of that one. Just the RdRp.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KU3432…

@Daoyu15 ImageImage
So it seems likely that the only reason that 4991 exists (well the RdRp only) is to form a cover for a manufactured coronavirus. There is no other explanation. No more of the genome of this exists.

(24 hr link blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?CMD=…) ImageImage
What drew my attention to this?
Well 4991 was used by certain members of #DRASTIC to publish a paper that promoted the assumption that #RaTG13 was real. It isn't.

So why promote the idea?
blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?CMD=…
#RaTG13 was touted as the precursor of #SARSCoV2 but it is fake. It didn't appear in Genbank until after SC2. It doesn't appear in ANY research papers before SC2.

Anybody promoting RaTG13 as real is acting to protect the makers of the #covid19 virus.
Which suggests to me that the authors - who seem very close - are promoting a narrative of deflection.

Of course, I might be wrong. Image
There are many write-ups on the fakery of RaTG13 - including from our very own favourite @Daoyu15 but this one is relatively easy to read.

nerdhaspower.weebly.com/ratg13-is-fake… Image
And just to clarify, I am not claiming that 4991 is fake. Quite to the contrary. I am claiming it was one of many attempts to make viral subgenomes by the WIV in preparation for the "big one".

So I'll leave it there.
@jjcouey @CharlesRixey feel free to disagree, this is science

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Aug 21
🚨 What you really don't want to do when choosing an injectable medicinal product...

is choose one made from a cancer-like cell line that also contains an SV40 promoter in its residual plasmid.

Oops. Too late.
#Shingrix

@MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @Kevin_McKernanImage
The plasmid maps for Gardasil 9, Bexsero and Shingrix released under FOI from the TGA

@karrichapus
tga.gov.au/sites/default/…Image
The cell line used to produce Shingrix is the CHO (chinese hamster ovary) cell line.

It is an immortalised cell line which means it continues to grow, just like cancer cells do.

It does this because it has gained or lost genes that tell it not to.
chop.edu/vaccine-educat…
Read 6 tweets
Aug 18
🚨THREAD:
The muttons descended on @MaryanneDemasi today, who I will show was correct in her report.

But first a reminder that Jon Laxton who led them is the front for the now defunct Project Halo and has never published a first author research paper on pubmed.

Maryanne has a PhD.

Thread below.

x.com/dr_jon_l/statu…

@PGtzsche1 @RetsefL @jsm2334 @DrJBhattacharya @SecKennedy @JesslovesMJK @chrismartensonImage
The claim made by the underqualified "Dr Jon" - and the muttons that descended on Dr Demasi - was that the study result was correct.

It was, in a way. But was fraudulently presented.
Here's the chart.

There were 37,909 babies given RSV monoclonals (which don't prevent death) Image
When assessing whether a vaccine works you can either perform a gold standard randomised controlled trial (RCT) or do a suboptimal study called a self control risk interval (SCRI) study, which is what happened here. It's recognised by the CDC.

sentinelinitiative.org/sites/default/…Image
Read 16 tweets
Aug 16
BREAKING: Just published paper shows that Taiwanese researchers had full access to the US EMR TrinetX network.

That is your medical data.
You consented, right?

Don't worry, you can't audit their data of course - because you can't have access. Just trust us bro.

#PennGate Image
Image
Image
Paper is here.
It's junk.
And no, you can't see their data.

link.springer.com/article/10.100…
The authors miscalculated the rate of cervical cancer in the general US population which is about 8 per 100,000 per year.

They managed to fabricate an unbelievable 17-29 per 100,000 per year in the three years of follow-up, where most registries haven't caught up. Oops. Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 7
The significance of yesterday's #Grokgate scandal cannot be understated.

Grok not only lied but lied about lying. Multiple times.

The reason it's so significant is that you are now going to enter a world of AI based medicine and it doesn't matter whether it's true or not, you better damn well take the drugs.

You see, when you lie about one thing to cover up another lie you can never be trusted in anything ever.

Grok fabricated a picture of a phone screen to show that a SpaceX rocket landing, which was fake footage, was real. That was to avoid the inevitable questions over where SpaceX money is going.

Do you want to live in a world where all your medical treatments are based on fabrications and hallucinations and the only thing that matters is that the corporations behind them keep getting paid?

Grok is that world.
Look at this picture which was fabricated by Grok earlier this year.

This is your next medical treatment. It will be as reliable as a SpaceX rocket.Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 29
WHOA!

What @TheBurninBeard is saying here is that the clinical samples that had "COVID" also had gene signatures of Mycoplasma fermentans, a US military pathogen that can be used as a vector to carry viral clones.

@SabinehazanMD found it too.
🧵
#spraygate @BrokenTruthTV
Can you see that Norman Pieniazek, who headed up the CDC's research division at the time that the @CDCgov sent biological weapons to Iraq to start a war, took himself out of this thread?

Do you know why?
@SecKennedy does.

A layman friendly round up of the US biological weapons initiatives, including gulf war syndrome and the spraying of pathogens.

sott.net/article/155150…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(