It's #WorldRefugeeDay and it's hard to think of a period when the international refugee regime has felt more under threat. It isn't just the government which is directly attacking the legal principles which were set out to protect them. 1/
Across the world refugees are demonised and discriminated against. Countries like Greece continue to operate illegal pushback operations which have already cost thousands of lives. The UK continues to enact inhumane policies, such as tagging and forced deportation. 2/
Denmark is attempting to follow suit and build on existing policies of confiscating asylum seekers valuables. In France both asylum seekers and those seeking to help them routinely face attacks from the authorities. 3/
In Italy there has been a concerted attempt to criminalise humanitarian assistance for those crossing the Mediterranean. And on and on it goes. It's easy to feel bleak and helpless in the face of it all. 4/
We have however seen that hope shines eternal. The proposed deportation flight to Rwanda on Tuesday was stopped thanks to the efforts of diligent lawyers and campaigners. Communities have stood up, as in Peckham, to prevent immigration enforcement removing people. 5/
This #WorldRefugeeDay2022 remember what it is all about, protecting those who so desperately need it. Amplify their voices and continue campaigning for their rights. Show we stand #TogetherWithRefugees, because together we can turn the tide and create a more welcoming world. 6/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: As it is #WorldRefugeeDay and the start of #RefugeeWeek2022 let's have a little look at some of the common misconceptions, and plain lies, spread about asylum seekers coming to the UK shall we? 1/
Let's start, appropriately, with the common myth of "first safe country". Now this gets said a lot, but in reality there is no mention of first safe country in any internationally recognised legal instrument related to refugees. 2/
The closest reference you will find is in the Dublin Regs, which the UK has now left, and even then effectively first country of entry is at the bottom of a hierarchical list of criteria for determining which state should process the application. 3/
This is and always will be a bogus argument. Thanks to the person who shared the screenshot by the way. At the time of Ed blocking me I was financing Stand For All out of my own pocket. My paid job was unrelated. 1/
Since then I have started working for a charity which focuses on supporting children who have been trafficked, and ending child trafficking. I work in a sector where we are trying to put ourselves out of a job. 2/
It is a repeated claim used by some though to shut down opposition to their arguments, that we are in it for the money. Nobody works in human rights for the money. Trust me on this. In my personal case though not only does Stand For All make no money, it costs me money. 3/
For personal reasons, namely a fundamental disdain and dislike for my own coupled with more than one scar, I normally try and avoid #FathersDay like the plague. This year though is a little different. 1/
You'll occasionally see some manufactured hysteria about schools sending home letters addressed to "parents and guardians" instead of "mother and father", despite this having been commonplace for decades. 2/
It is actually important though, and not just, rightly, to respect trans-individuals. It's important because there are many children who don't have mothers and fathers. They have guardians and people they see as parents. 3/
Really good piece by @Natasha_Walter which mirrors a lot of my thinking on this. A large part of both of my jobs is thinking through what strategy the government is using, how are they trying to draw us in, what will the backlash be etc. 1/
It would be wrong to consider the government totally inept. When it comes to setting up a long term comms narrative to screw people over they are very very good. They have been building and refining the "activist lawyers and do-gooders" lines for more than a year. 2/
They knew it would all come down to the courts, so they weaponised the narrative against the legal system. They knew people would protest against inhumanity, so they made protest sound like it was "unpatriotic" and against the public interest. They've worked on all of this. 3/
It is not illegal to cross the channel, or seek asylum. It is illegal to penalise an asylum seeker for manner of entry. While asylum seekers are in some cases already tagged, that the government is planning on treating them all as criminals by increasing tagging is unconscionable
The trauma which tagging asylum seekers, particularly younger ones, can cause is immeasurable. These are vulnerable people fleeing war and persecution, many with serious fears about how a state can abuse and monitor them.
Tagging prevents people being able to integrate into communities effectively, particularly when others see them as criminals, let alone due to their own self-esteem being hit, which further isolates them from support structures which they need to rebuild their lives.
Long thread: Okay, so apparently it is #AutisticPrideDay, which I didn't actually know existed. Here's my, somewhat grumpy, thoughts on that. Usual disclaimers on an #ActuallyAutistic thread, I'm only talking about my perspective not any other autistic individual's. 1/
I worry when people say they are "celebrating" autistic people though, because, as well meaning as I am sure many are, it kind of feels like getting a pat on the head and an "atta boy" as if I am a toddler who just did something perfectly normal but has overly proud parents. 2/
I struggle with things. I can't tell whether I am hot or cold, which you can imagine has been wonderful the last couple of days during a heatwave when your body still has the normal reaction. I can't tell if I am hungry, need the loo, or just fancy a cigarette. 3/