#SupremeCourt will shortly hear the plea filed by #ShivSena Chief Whip challenging the communication issued by #Maharashtra governor calling for a floor test on June 30.
Singhvi for #SunilPrabhu: I have 7 or 8 points. Preliminary point generally the letter which tells us about the floor test says that June 28, #Devendra_Fadnavis met the governor and today at in the morning, we received this intimation. As a matter of fact, 2 NCP MLAs have #COVID
Singhvi for #SunilPrabhu: The floor test determines which government represents the people. It is suppose to find out the true majority.
Singhvi for #SunilPrabhu: If the disqualification proceedings happen, the pool will change. The size of the pool depends on whether people have committed a constitutional sin or not.
Singhvi For #SunilPrabhu: The governor knows that the #SupremeCourt has taken over the matter pertaining to disqualification. The court has substituted a court regime as opposed to the speaker’s regime.
Singhvi: Vote confidence cannot be held within 6 months after the floor test.
Court: As far the disqualification issue is concerned, the matter is subjudice before us. We will surely decide either way. But how does the #FloorTest depend on this issue? #MaharashtraPolitcalCrisis
Singhvi: A disqualification once found by the speaker, relates back to the date of disqualification. These MLAs stand disqualified on 21/22 when they did the act. The court cannot treat them even as members as of that day
Court: Is your contention that there will be a presumption of deemed disqualification under the 10th schedule?
Singhvi: The fact that the court has stopped the process, would mean that the persons cannot have it both way. PROCESS OF DISQUALIFICATION IS STOPPED
Singhvi: The fact that the court has interdicted the process, the fact of the matter is that they cannot have it both ways - 3 constitution benches have said that 10th schedule represents a "constitutional sin"
Court: The court’s intervention is only on basis of the #EknathSinde ’s exceptional circumstances. The time period was extended because of their notice disqualification of Dy Speaker.
Supreme Court says that Singhvi has vast experience in cases like this and he needn't cite the plethora of cases already in place.
Singhvi says, "They will use my own arguments against me!" (light-hearted)
Singhvi for Sena Whip: A very practical question, when your Lordships have intervened, how does anybody set it right if the Government is to be voted on a person who is disqualified?
Singhvi for Sena Whip says that the voting is being allowed by a person who may be disqualified. "This nips right at the bud of democracy. There is so much undue haste!"
Singhvi: Hon'ble Governer works on "the aid and advise of the CM" and certainly cannot act on the aid and advise of the opposition! The situation is that the trust vote can be made two days after Monday. They came faster than expected!
Singhvi: The act of giving a letter requesting to call upon leader on opposite side to form a government is illegal. My friends on the opposite side seem to think they can do what they want!
Singhvi: These people go to Surat and Guwahati and send an email which is unverified to the Speaker. That itself is against establish tenets in Rabia judgment. These people have hobnobbed with BJP and this is against the established law of Defection.
Singhvi: The Floor test begs the question, who is going to vote on the floor test. This lies at the test if WILL OF THE PEOPLE. This is clear interdiction of the will of the people.
Singhvi: Whatever is happening is a mockery of the law. I have at the moment, only read the letter which says only two things that they are unsatisfied and they want to exit.
Singhvi is arguing that the floor test must only be held, if at all, after the disqualification petition(s) are decided. He is currently relying on the landmark judgment of Kihoto Hollohan vs Zachillhu And Others
Singhvi referring to judgment in the case of Bommai he says “the validity of the proclamation issued by the president will be judicially reviewable. Milords the President is a higher authority than the Governor.”
Singhvi says that the cases in which he appeared and the Supreme Court ruled otherwise (That the Governor has the power to call for a floor test) were cases which are not relevant in the facts and circumstances of the present case.
Singhvi: These 5 cases in which I appeared are simple cases, in which the court had to simply decide whether there was a need for a floor test or not. In short, they were simpliciter cases. (He now reads parts of Harish Chandra Rawat Vs. UOI)
Singhvi: In ShivRaj Singh Chouhan (where SC ordered floor test in MP), it was a case where an artificial majority was sought to be made by making people resign.
Singhvi: Only your lordships can stop the floor test. (Singhvi reads his own contentions in the Shiv Raj Singh Chouhan case, stating that the opposite side's lawyers are relying on his contentions to perpetuate their own contentions)
Singhvi: Here, the prime difference is that the Speaker is not a free agent (unlike the MP Floor test case wherein the Kamal-nath led Congress Government was toppled on account of no-confidence)
Singhvi: The point of the matter is that nothing prevents the speaker from taking a decision despite convening of trust vote. However, this is a poignant situation - Suppose speaker was permitted to proceed and the floor test were to be held, then will the system work?
Singhvi: Today, the hands of the speaker are tied.
Singhvi: This kind of a floor test, with 4 members - 2 down with covid, 2 abroad.. Governor not acting in accord with aid and advise of Council of ministers... is a piquant situation. Prabhu is a whip.
Singhvi: Mr. Prabhu's whip has to be either obeyed or of Mr. Kaul. That is undecided - who is the whip? Therefore, At the end of the day, the Court must balance. A temporary abeyance must be kept.
Kaul for #EknathSinde : A floor test should never ever be delayed. Merely because of pendency of proceedings, pertaining to whether an MLA or MP has resigned, a floor test cannot be delayed.
Court: These proceedings are not voluntarily pending before the speaker, they are pending because of the order of the court. That is what the other side has said.
Kaul: The #SupremeCourt has said such proceedings can be decided and should be decided. In the meantime, these people constitute the strength of the court.
Kaul for #EknathSinde : The #SupremeCourt says if there is a petition pending, the speaker cannot touch the matter. He has to deal with his own disqualification.
Court: This argument suggests that we should first determine the competence of the speaker.
Kaul for #EknathSinde : A government that enjoys a majority, will be ready to go to a #FloorTest . The #SupremeCourt has said a government that is hesitant may have lost the trust of the house.
Court: The power of the governor to issue notice to the #FloorTest is absolutely independent, we will proceed on that assumption. Second part, who is competent to vote in the floor test?
Kaul for #eknathsindhe : The other side is trying to co-relate two events that cannot be related. THEY ARE A HOPELESS MINORITY WITHIN THE PARTY ITSELF, THEY WANT TO CLING TO THE POWER LIKE THIS.
Kaul for #EknathSinde : The mere pendency of disqualification of MLAs cannot come in the way. This is a completely independent exercise. In a matter is of this, when there is a confusion, the only avenue is #FloorTest
Kaul for #EknathSinde : You maybe the speaker, but you are not above the constitution. Whether they are not ultimately disqualified or not is a different issue. The more you delay the floor test, the more damage and violence you do to the constitution. #MaharashtraPolitcalCrisis
Kaul for #EknathSinde : Is the action of the governor is the present matter so irrational that the #SupremeCourt has to interfere?
Kaul for #EknathSinde : The governor has taken everything into account because of the governor has taken everything into consideration. He has sent a detailed letter. They cannot just frown upon media reports, media is also an integral part.
Kaul for #EknathSinde : What they are trying to do is the antithesis of democracy, not in furtherance of democracy. The court can only ascertain whether the decision making process is right or not.
Kaul for #EknathSinde : Just because the governor recovered from #COVID two days ago, should he not continue to perform his constitutional duties? This is the sort of argument that is being made.
Kaul for #EknathSinde : The speaker could not have decided on the MLA disqualification. He could not have decided when his own disqualification is pending.
Kaul: How is the #SupremeCourt proceedings in the disqualification will be rendered infructuous? These are two different proceedings. Their submission is directly in the teeth of what the court has said. #MaharashtraPoliticalCrisis
Kaul: 1) Floor test can only be delayed only when there is an all pervading atmosphere of violence 2) Governor by whatever means shall determine and ascertain whether the floor test should be held 3) #floortest will uphold political identity and morality. It is a litmus test.
Kaul concludes.
Court: How many MLAs are in the dissident group?
Kaul: 39 out of 55. That is why there is this great nervousness to avoid a floor test.
Singh, Sr. Adv: the writ petition is filed for the benefit of 55 MLAs by somebody who enjoys the support of a few. What the court did the day before is for compliance with natural justice. #MaharashtraPoliticalCrisis
Singh: if you want to continue in the government, you must continue to enjoy the confidence. Similarly if you want to continue as the speaker, you must continue to hold the office.
SG: The speaker cannot decide who will vote for his disqualification and who will not when the letter is sent. The speaker cannot decide his own electoral college.
SG: I could not hear Dr. Singhvi’s argument even for a while as to how the order of the governor was bad. It is nobody’s case that decision of the governor is not amenable to judicial review.
SG: The parameters for challenging Governor's order are not met by the petitioners.
SG: It would be dereliction of duty on governor’s if he had not considered. The governor has considered a statement by a Shiv Sena’s spokesperson about bodies arriving in Mumbai. The spokesperson on national television has said this is only warming up!
Court: We can ignore this
SG: He has made this statement despite being told that he is on national television milords!
SG: The governor has taken into consideration various letters which are sent to him. The governor in totality is satisfied based on the circumstances which are not irrelevant. In absence of anything is being pointed against the order of the governor. The court may not interfere
SG concluded.
Singhvi: There is not a single case where this court has tied the hands of the speaker. Yet, it is pressed repeatedly by the counsels as if the judgments have relevance. #Maharashtra
Singhvi: Entire matter has been argued by Mr.Kaul as if their writ challenging disqualification stands allowed. Nabam Rebia specifically notes that it is not about floor test.
Singhvi: Another point that has been argued is that speaker is always suspect but governor is a holy cow. I request my friends to wake up and smell the coffee. These are changing times. This governor has not allowed nominations for 12 MLCs for one year.
Singhvi: Has the governor made any attempt in verifying the facts cited all by himself. Except for meeting #DevendraFadnavis . But the speaker is always suspect, he is always political.
Singhvi: Governor is not an angel, he is human. The governor has not called upon the CM for his point of view. A floor test done tomorrow irreversible.
Singhvi: This the case where the court has been drawn into the merits. Anybody who intends to defect will simply send a notice for disqualification! The court cannot allow a constitutional sin by doubting the speaker
Singhvi: 16 people have been moved in disqualification. 23 others have been filed. They are to be processed, while they were being processed the court passed this order.
BREAKING: #SupremeCourt REFUSES TO STAY the floor test in #Maharashtra that is to happen tomorrow (June 30, 2022) . The court however makes it clear that the Floor test will be subject to the outcome of this plea.
BREAKING: #SupremeCourt is hearing plea by #NupurSharama asking transfer of FIRs registered against her in many states to be transferred to #Delhi for investigation. “The petition shows her arrogance!!” Justice Surya Kant remarks
Justice Surya Kant says “Sometimes power goes into head! People think that I have back up and say anything."
BREAKING: According to sources, the #MVA has moved a plea before #SupremeCourt seeking suspension of 39 ‘rebel’ MLAs till their disqualification petitions is decided by the Deputy Speaker.
The bench initiated proceedings on the basis of a letter petition written to the Chief Justice of J&K High Court stating, nearly twelve attacks have been done on
local #ReligiousMinorities living in #KashmirValley apart from those who
came to #Kashmir for their bread, butter.
The letter submitted by @KPSSamiti through its President Sanjay K Tickoo stated that "the #KashmiriPandits/ Hindus want to leave #KashmirValley
but the Government is not allowing them to leave which can be gathered from
the press/ news reports and social media statements."
BREAKING: UP government informs Allahabad High Court that, Javed Mohammad, whose house was demolished in #Prayagraj used the premises commercially for 'Welfare Party of India'. #UP has also told the court that the demolition order was passed on May 25, 2022.
#UP has filed a counter affidavit in plea filed by Javed’s wife Parveen Fatima before Allahabad High Court. The affidavit further states that Javed Mohammad is the State General Secretary of ‘Welfare Party of India’
According to the counter affidavit, Parveen Fatima in her plea has not told the court that a demolition order was passed in May 2022. It has been stated that the demolition order itself is not challenged in the plea and hence it is not maintainable.
#SupremeCourt will today hear plea by alleged conman Sukash Chandrashekar seeking transfer out of Tihar jail on the ground that there is a threat to his life.
Bench to Chandrashekar’s lawyer: Last time you sought time to file an affidavit, we have not gotten a copy of it.
Basant, Sr. Adv, for Chandrashekar: we filed it on 28th June milords. The Director General of Prisons is extorting money.
ASG Raju: I received a copy on 29 June
ASG: He is running an extortion racket from jail milords, he has extorted around 300 crores. The moment they became strict he wants a transfer.
Having heard Ld. Sr. Counsel for the applicant and Mr.SG and we allow the applicants to participate in the special session of the State Legislative assembly, scheduled to be held tomorrow. Since they are in custody pursuant to cases registered by ED
Order:
CBI and ED are directed to escort them to Vidhan Sabha and once the proceedings are over, they shall be brought back to judicial custody.