Thread by @WesleyBKress

I am always impressed with @otisa502 & have had many hour long conversations in the past 1+ year. Very intelligent.

I was very impressed with the hard questions he asked @SimonDixonTwitt not at all impressed with the answers he provided especially considering his confidence $CEL

Also, at no point was @otisa502 trying to defend Alex so stop with the #StockholmSyndrome shame tactics. Also, Otis has a far superior pulse on the Celsius community as a whole. He has been involved with almost all the meetings in community. I have been taken back by how

Poorly @SimonDixonTwitt has communicated with the community, particularly around $CEL token, fueling division but this likely is from not understanding how this has been how the community was so strong. We are were the best asset. Also, @otisa502 rightfully called out

@SimonDixonTwitt for his flip flopping of stay away from bankruptcy at all cost to now all in on bankruptcy. I realize this is a fluid situation but how can a man make so many mistakes with his background in these situations? Likely because he doesn’t really understand the

Community, at least the one built around the $CEL token. Speaking down to them is no way to win them over. Taking credence & support from someone who stated $CEL to Zero & not having the emotional intelligence to see his wrongdoing, or apologize, unreal. I am clear that Alex is

likely a sociopathic, machiavellian, narcissist that only cares about himself. With that said @SimonDixonTwitt why in bloody hell if you know so much have you made so many communication mistakes? How did you not know about $CEL token & its place or wrongful one when you led

Series A Funding? How did @BankToTheFuture not stop it then, if you knew for fact it was an unregistered security? We all knew its schedule D filing. Then supporting them (2 months ago) when the Series B has all the red flags of not handing over proper documentation? Alex,

Continually stated that the $CEL token was a way for Non-Accredited investors to participate in the upside. Have you not taken anytime or true due diligence, when @BankToTheFuture was the lead investors & funding after the $CEL ICO in 2017. Did you not realize the conflict this

Would create to the token holders. It was sold to everyone that the $CEL token holders were “equity-like” & you had to know this leading the Series A Funding for Celsius. For someone that supposedly has fought for Financial Inclusion in the industry, how did U miss these points?

You also seemed to show @otisa502 very little respect, just that you wanted to know why he was the most skeptical of you. Otis has earned the trust by putting in the time & truly caring. He seems to know more about the community than you do which is obvious from your poor

Communication to the $CEL token stakeholders. I would recommend @SimonDixonTwitt find some humility & apologize for some of the poor ways he has communicated. I do believe @SimonDixonTwitt is one of the best possibilities of helping but it would go a long way to know that

You are actually understanding all the stakeholders, including the $CEL token holders, mind you the original OG’s from ICO in 2017 who have been the most screwed through all of this taking on the most risk & starting the company prior to Series A that you led & didn’t care then

About demanding Alex & the team communicate that the token was essentially just used to raise money with no real claim to equity. If you cared about the small player “non-accredited” investor that you claim to want to “include” than why did you not call out Alex & Team then?

Again, I will reiterate that you, @SimonDixonTwitt have done an extremely poor job of communicating or protecting ALL the stakeholders up to this point & @BankToTheFuture has a lot blood on its hands if you truly did care about the “small investor” or financial inclusion. $CEL