As we seen the unfolding Ukrainian operations in southern Ukraine, it is worth pondering, what happens when Ukraine takes back the south? 1/21 🧵
2/ This region is a significant source of Ukrainian GDP. It is also the location of major power plants, and the ports through which goods are dispatched that represent over half of Ukraine’s export earnings.
3/ Russian government agents, assisted by the military, are seeking to institute a range of Russian government systems to annexe Ukraine’s southern region.
4/ These all provide an imperative to undertake large scale military operations to take back their lands seized by Russia. The Ukrainian President has recently directed his armed forces to conduct such a campaign.
5/ Offensive operations are much more difficult than defensive operations. However, the Ukrainians have demonstrated a canny ability to surprise Western observers with the rapid absorption of equipment and adaptation of battlefield tactics so far.
6/ We should expect that this kind of strategic learning will continue as they prepare for and conduct a southern counter offensive.
7/ The Russian government has been very clear in their intention to retain the Ukrainian territory they occupy. And while both sides have the will and the capability for a sustained campaign, only one side is fighting for its lands and its people.
8/ Predications in war are perilous. But with continuing Western support, clever planning, rehearsals, effective execution, adaptation, and excellent leadership, the Ukrainians are very capable of taking back their territory in the south.
9/ This poses an important question; what happens next? If the Russians are pushed back into Crimea, how does this affect their overall campaign in Ukraine?
10/ First, a Russian loss in the south will be a significant blow for the Putin government. It will make international headlines, embarrassing Putin’s friends in Beijing and Tehran, and emboldening Ukraine’s supporters. And it will also cause unease at home.
11/ 2nd, it will provide additional impetus for NATO and Western support for Ukraine. A significant Ukrainian battlefield victory in an offensive should energise those who have lagged in providing important offensive capabilities.
12/ It will demonstrate (again) that #Ukraine has both the will and the ability to defeat Russia and push them back to (at least) the 24 February borders. It would serve as a massive confidence boost for Ukraine and the West more broadly.
13/ 3rd, it will unhinge the current Russian strategy. Putin placed a heavy emphasis on seizing the south in the early weeks of the war. He was hoping that possessing the south and its ports would allow Russia to slowly strangle #Ukraine.
14/ But without possessing the south, Russia’s current strategy will have failed.
15/ As the Ukrainians have shown throughout the war, they are very willing to fight and kill as many Russians as it takes. But they are at their best when undertaking clever, indirect actions that destroy Russia’s #strategy.
16/ Finally, losing the south will force Putin and his military commanders to make difficult strategic choices.
17/ Because if the Russian Naval base at Sevastopol comes into range of Ukrainian long range strike weapons in the south, is it then a bastion worth retaining and defending for Russia?
18/ If not, a Russian withdrawal from Crimea (as a goodwill gesture, of course) will have significant political ramifications for Putin at home. But if Russia stays in Crimea, they will need to further dilute their forces in the east to send more defenders to Crimea.
19/ For both the Ukrainians and the Russians, the campaign in the south will be the decisive front in the war. For Ukraine, ongoing or increased Western support may be a vital outcome of victory. smh.com.au/national/south…
20/ For Russia, overall success in this war to subjugate Ukraine, and extinguish their democracy, probably rests on their retention of the south. The stakes are the very high indeed. End
21/ Thank you to those whose images I used in this thread: @DefenceHQ @IAPonomarenko @RALee85 @JominiW @smh @Cyx_5 @CovertShores

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mick Ryan, AM

Mick Ryan, AM Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WarintheFuture

Jul 24
An updated thread on the wartime #leadership demonstrated by @ZelenskyyUa – with a focus on visiting troops in the field, effective civil-military relations, and courage. 1/14 🧵
2/ His visits have many purposes. First, it allows @ZelenskyyUa to get a feel for the morale and capability of his military in the field. You can read reports all day, but there is no substitute for walking the ground with leaders at the tip of the spear.
3/ A second purpose is that it allows him to ask questions. This is an important function of a national political leader in their interaction with military commanders. Even the best staff cannot anticipate all the questions their leaders might have.
Read 14 tweets
Jul 22
At some point in the new few weeks, it is likely we will see increasing counter attacks – potentially a large counter offensive – in the south of #Ukraine. This thread looks at the rationale, and some issues that planners will be considering. 1/24 🧵 Image
2/ Why the south? First, it is a significant source of Ukrainian GDP as well as the location of the ports through which goods are dispatched that represent over half of Ukraine’s export earnings.
3/ Second, the Russians are conducting a range of actions that are indicative of their annexation of parts of the country they occupy. The President and the government of Ukraine will keen to prevent this. washingtonpost.com/world/2022/07/…
Read 24 tweets
Jul 19
Last Friday, I had the pleasure of catching up for lunch with a colleague who is also an ethicist. While our discussion was broad ranging, we kept returning to the notion of good and evil, and the idea of ‘just wars’ in relation to #Ukraine. 1/22 🧵
2/ At the same time we were discussing the ethics of war, the Organization for Security and Cooperation and Europe released its latest report that examined the horrific acts attributed to the Russian Army and its proxies in Ukraine. osce.org/odihr/522616
3/ The report notes that “some of the most serious violations encompass targeted killing of civilians, including journalists, human rights defenders, or local mayors; unlawful detentions, abductions and enforced disappearances of the same categories of persons…”
Read 21 tweets
Jul 17
The last two months have seen a different kind of War in Ukraine. And after a period of reduced tempo operations in the east, we should expect things to heat up again over the coming weeks. Both sides will want to make progress before winter comes. 1/20 🧵
2/ After their failures before Kyiv and Kharkiv, and manpower losses, the Russians have now settled into a different pattern of battlefield operations. Now, they let their artillery lead the way.
3/ While it has still been expensive for the Russians, they have managed to secure almost all of Luhansk region. In the wake of this ‘success’, the Russians reduced their operational tempo to prepare for a subsequent operation to secure the Donetsk region.
Read 20 tweets
Jul 15
Earlier this week, I wrote about the impact that several HIMARS rocket artillery systems are having in #Ukraine. And while the focus of the article was Ukraine, I also explored HIMARS for Australia. 1/10 smh.com.au/world/europe/w…
2/ The genesis of this capability for the ADF was back in 2013-2014. It was envisaged as a deployable capability for Australia to execute what we called Joint Archipelagic Manoeuvre. You can read it here: researchcentre.army.gov.au/sites/default/…
3/ Despite some reticence in the Department of Defence, and from those who saw it as a threat to their more expensive strike projects, eventually it was agreed that the Army should have a 21st century long range strike capability. Like every other modern Army.
Read 10 tweets
Jul 12
Over the past few days, the Twittersphere has been expounding on the impact that several #HIMARS rocket artillery systems are having in #Ukraine. And they are awesome! But some perspective is required before expectations for their impact get too overblown. 1/17 🧵
2/ HIMARS is a lighter, more deployable version of an older tracked launcher that used the same rockets. And because it is mobile, it can shoot and move quickly, making it a very survivable platform in an era of short times between detection and destruction.
3/ HIMARS, because of its range and accuracy, is a weapon that is designed to attack targets deep in the enemy’s rear. It is used to destroy critical communications nodes, command posts, airfields, and important logistics facilities.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(