With the speculation around #TheMerge turning #ether into a #security, it's important to understand:
- what the conditions for ruling sth a 'security' are; and
- what this will mean for miners, DeFi protocols, and DAOs.
🧵👇
Context: #Ethereum is moving from a proof-of-work to a proof-of-stake system, where ppl need to invest/stake in capital to validate new blocks. Anchored in the Howey Test, professor @AdamLevitin argued that this transition will likely turn ether into a security.
Howey Test validates whether a sales/transaction is considered a security and should fall under its law. Its validator components include: 1. Investment of money 2. In a common enterprise 3. With an expectation of profits 4. Solely from the efforts of the promoter/a third party
Based on those principles, these are the elements that fall correspondingly to the fields above: 1. Individuals stake money 2. In Ethereum (common enterprise) 3. Profits expectation is through staking rewards 4. Primarily from the efforts of other Ethereum participants
However, this assumption is undermined by the former SEC regulator William Hinman, doubting that ETH would be branded a security on such basis. He made a remark in 2018 saying that Ethereum had become sufficiently decentralized to unlikely be considered an investment contract.
@TimBeiko is on the same boat as Hinman, only from a different lens. The most important point he pointed out was that the hashing in PoS is far less computationally intense than PoW hashing for Ethereum 2.0 to be considered 'efforts of others.'
If believing in prof. Levitin's argument, miners could either go with #TheMerge or start a new project. Either way requires a hard fork anyways. Small DeFi projects can continue to operate without much worry about being chased after down the road by the SEC.
Poko has been directly working with the Kazakh government to create a new jurisdiction that is flexible for changes to accommodate #DAO legalization and web3 growth.
If you are interested in talking with us and see how we could help materialize your DAO in the safest and most affordable way possible... Let's start talking: flatfbx5wzx.typeform.com/to/tjD0fGYd
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To our #DAO buidlers/contributors/enthusiasts, let's ease ourselves into weekend mode.
In case your mind wanders to your [existing/future] DAO, here are the three key problems you might want to think through over the weekend to set clear objectives for next week:
🧵👇
1/ Jurisdictional base
BVI, Cayman, and Delaware are the notorious BCD of DAO incorporation but have many drawbacks. Look for: setup costs, taxation, and access to crypto-fiat rails (hardest to find). AIFC is the only jurisdiction that has all three. Poko made that happen.
2/ Leaders' liability
Even with a #legal wrapper, any problem rises will eventually come down to the people who builds the DAO. Who are going to handle internal disputes/external regulatory inquiry/external civil lawsuit? How are they going to deal with each scenario?
Follow the thread to understand the case, how doing-nothing is troublesome, why using sanctions is tempting for large nations, and the crypto-specific aspects to watch for moving forward.
🧵👇
1/ OFAC = Office of Foreign Assets Control
They enforce sanctions against high profile individuals deemed hostile to American interests. To ensure that Americans cannot legally do business with Iran, North Korea, etc without special government approval. (c/o @BowTiedIguana)
2/ Tornado Cash (TC) helps mix Ethereum users’ ETH or ERC-20 tokens with other users’ to obscure the info of the sender, recipient, and time of sending. The legitimate reason for OFAC to chase after TC is mainly the suspicion that it is linked to North Korea’s Lazarus Group.