Wash trading or "painting the tape" is a form of market manipulation whereby market players attempt to influence the price of a security by buying and selling amongst themselves to create the appearance of substantial trading activity.
The practice of wash trading may be to create the illusion that demand for a project is higher than it actually is, or simply to mine activity rewards offered by platforms that encourage platform activity.
The traditional securities and futures markets prohibit wash trading, but it's still commonly seen in the NFT market as the market is still in its early stages of development.
According to NFTGo.io, there are currently 1075 collections and more than 82,000 addresses involved in wash trading. Moreover, the number of wash trades across the network has amounted to more than 250,000.
Some projects employ wash trading to pump prices as a means of marketing, which is an attempt to deceive users with data. However, since there are many reasons and ways to achieve wash trading, one cannot generalize.
For example, among the top 10 projects with a high level of wash trading, there are some little-known projects and potential blue-chip projects like Meebits.
Investors should be cautious because they can be deceived by wash trading, and it helps you understand if the NFTs being traded appear to be excessively "centralized."
Most wash trades are instantaneous, of high frequency, and take place over a long period. According to NFTGo.io, most wash trades require 5 minutes to complete a cycle.
By understanding the above, we're able to identify the keys to wash trading and target certain behaviors—the buyers and sellers are often single or multiple addresses under the control of one person.
Interestingly enough, our data doesn't show a linear decrease in elapsed time. We can see that cycles that span one and three days are more abundant than those that span only 1, 1.5, or 2 hours.
For example, when studying projects such as CryptoKitties and Axie Infinity, a large number of closed cycles with recurring addresses were found in their transaction records (e.g.
0xb1690c08e213a35ed9bab7b318de14420fb57d8c had over half a million closed-cycle transactions),
exhibiting an apparent money-laundering characteristic.
However, no closed-cycle transaction is detected once the criteria are limited to the hourly level. This finding is contrary to the high-frequency characteristic we mentioned before.
As the quantity involved is enormous, these seemingly "sluggish" trades often generate a significant volume of transactions, creating a false picture of a booming market.
To some extent, this makes wash trading easier to be covered up. Wash trades performed on Ethereum cost substantial gas fees, which means "wash traders" who are capable of affording these costs are likely well-funded and have clear and thoughtful strategies.
Generally speaking, wash trading is recurring, and the collections involved are of a wide range. Some of these are malicious acts of project developers, while others are profit-gaining tactics of users.
There are mainly three purposes of wash trading. First, to cause speculation for a project. This is done by pumping the price and trading volume of the project with funds so as to attract buyers.
Therefore, frequent transactions well above the floor price, irregular transaction records under the same address of a single NFT, etc. can be used as a basis for identification.
We enumerate the on-chain behaviors of "wash traders" by assuming their possible paths. First of all, the same user may create multiple sub-wallets in order to perform transactions between their own wallets.
These wallets need to have enough funds to interact before they're ready to trade, and some traders transfer money directly from their main wallet, thus creating a one-to-many structural association.
Currently, we're able to "trace" wash trading transactions through on-chain data and track the main wallet to determine the identity of the trader, but once the funds exit the marketplace, the chain "breaks."
Secondly, we perform wallet correlation clustering to capture closed-cycle transactions between wallets. If two or more wallets have been conducting uninterrupted high-frequency transactions and have not been interacting with other wallets, such wallets can be deemed suspicious.
With these two on-chain behaviors, we are able to identify some programmed wash trades and thus identify sub-wallets in reverse, but the downside is that we do not know the identity of the "wash trader" when the funds come from off-site.
Thirdly, the transaction history of a particular NFT shows that the same NFT has been traded multiple times in a short period of time at a price well above the floor, with no significant change in the position.
These are the key actions used by "wash traders" to fulfill their needs (raising floor prices, increasing trading volume, etc.). Additionally, they must reduce losses as much as possible.
Through the minimum cycle of "creating multiple wallets - transferring money to each wallet - purchasing NFTs with each wallet - and inter-wallet transactions," a wash trade is done. This way, the NFTs and funds are always held by one person.
Usually, in a wash trade,NFTs and funds will return to the trader's initial address or to the trader's wallet via an OTC trade. Therefore, with the "primary trader - other addresses - primary trader"cycle, we can categorize the trade flow based on address clustering and priority.
Types of wash trading activities
By using data analysis and quantitative algorithms, we can break down the types of NFT wash trading activities. An example is closed-cycle transactions between two or more parties.
a single transaction (sale) is regarded as one act, two closed-cycle transactions constitute a binary loop, and three transactions constitute a closed-loop called a ternary loop; abnormal transactions between multiple addresses under the control of the same party, etc
Based on the above classification, we have found that closed-cycle transactions between binary loops amounted to the highest number, which was followed by triple loops.
On top of the Price and Top Sale charts under each collection page, there is now the new “Filter Wash Trades” button. This feature enables users to get an actual view of market activity with wash trading activity filtered out.
When the filter button is turned off, a red flag is tagged next to all suspected trades as a reminder to users. By turning on the button, these trades will be hidden from the list.
If a collection is associated with too many wash trading transactions that affect the overall ranking of some key metrics, and we will tag them as abnormal collections.
For instance, adding KYC to the interaction between the sub-wallets and the marketplace would allow for the identification of "multiple wallets per person," although the marketplace might lose some privacy-conscious users as a result.
As the market develops, different types of wash trading have emerged, and some projects even conduct such trades explicitly, producing fraudulent data to disrupt the market.
I think that the ability of core holders, to give back to space attendees and sweep, without getting any benefits from the team or from others, is truly incredible.
Consisting of 8 full-time team members who have worked together for 6+ years scaling a platform used by millions, generating over a billion data points.
Team members have been well known most notably for being in the Forbes 30 under 30. They're always finding ways to provide more value, and fixing minor issues!
Hello everyone With the impending bear market rally, here are top projects that I'd suggest you prioritize in securing a whitelist for a profitable mint.🤝
Here's a list of projects that I feel are very undervalued, and should hopefully do really well if and when the next bull run comes!
P.S These are INDEFINITE holds. Don't blindly ape thinking you could turn this into a profit overnight. No one knows when the next cycle will come
- Their CEO is Julian Holguin, Billboard's veteran president. With his connections and networking capabilities, Doodles definitely has the potential to fully bridge web2 into web3.