In the post-truth age, when the study of history faces stiff competition from a reckless #Mythistory, and facts are not even referred to, students and scholars must counter this trend more strongly than before.
“Islamic invasion of India, The Biggest Hoax in History”.
A thread. Image
The Indian sub-continent faced multiple invasions and incursions since recorded history began - likely before as well. Aryans, Huns, Scythians, Bactrians, Greeks, Kushans et alia, all made their way into what now encapsulates the geographical boundaries of India, over millenia. ImageImage
As such, there is no singular event, episode or arrival that may be defined as “The Islamic Invasion of India”, in historical terms. From at least the 13th century onwards, military competition for political domination was primarily between Islamicate dispensations themselves. Image
The author of this thread makes the following claims about Sindh without references to any primary sources. Furthermore, claims about the Umayyads making non-Arabs pay Jiziya are also hollow, and make no reference to the Rida’ah wars, whose basis was not at all Arab supremacy! ImageImageImage
In fact, the first encounters between Islam and Buddhism in Sindh were not overtly hostile, at all. The Arabs merely intervened in an ongoing struggle for supremacy between Hindu cliques and a Buddhist dispensation facing decline due to its power struggle with Hinduism. ImageImage
For an excellent introduction to Islam’s early interactions with #Buddhism; rarely a hostile exchange, do listen to this excellent podcast. The truth is more nuanced and less studied than the hype.
m.soundcloud.com/tricyclemag/jo…
The advent of Islam in the north of the Indian Sub-continent is properly dated to 712 AD, through the conquest of #Sindh by the 17 year old Arab general, Mohammad bin Qasim. His army and followers numbering some 15,000 (largely Arab) individuals, established a colony in Multan…
…which, from all accounts became an isolated but largely peaceful outpost of a global Islamic empire that overwhelmed the West, as far as Spain.
Even the mildly Islamophobic Orientalist, Stanley Lane-Poole concedes the Arab administration of Sindh was tolerant and conciliatory. ImageImage
The numbers bandied by Hindutva historians defy historical reality, make no reference to sources, ignore population studies, genetics and above all logic. The figure of 2 million plus humans being killed/enslaved in the remote tracts of Ghazni’s advance is not only absurd, it… ImageImage
…is wholly illogical.
Mahmud Ghaznawi issued coins for his subjects, in Arabic and Sanskrit that read:

"avyaktameka muhammada avatar nripati mahamuda."

“The Invisible is One, Muhammad is the manifestation, Mahmud the king.” @IndiaArtHistory

Not the work of a genocidal maniac! Image
Apart from getting the date wrong, by a decade (Timur arrived at the gates of Delhi in 1398), the fantastical figure of 750,000 killed/enslaved has no basis in any facts. Delhi was in any case a Tughlaq seat and neither Yazdi, Ferishta nor Khwandamir give specific figures. Image
@justinmarozzi, a biographer of Timur describes accounts of Timur’s massacre of Delhi as “suspect”, in his book “Tamerlane: Sword of Islam, Conqueror of the World”. Exaggerations and fabrications cannot substitute real-history, based on facts. Image
Even more absurd and illogical is the figure of “60 to 80” million casualties, “as a result of Islamic invasions between 1000-1525”, given that 100 million was the likely estimated population of the whole of India, in the 16th century!
These figures are simply perverse.
As if that was not enough, the author makes the claim that “70-90 million Hindus died” between the 11th-17th century, ie. 10-20 million died in the 100 years between the 16th-17th century, according to his preceding figure! And for Aurangzeb (RA) to have killed off 4.6 million… Image
…in his 50 year reign, “for not converting” is laughable! This means he killed an average of 95,000/year for simply not converting; in other words nearly 4% of the population of the Indian sub-continent! Perhaps this gives you some idea of the scale of nonsense being propagated!
And finally, coming to the oft-repeated quote by Will Durant, please examine the attached thread below, before falling for this selective line. This should allow some perspective, hopefully.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yusuf A Ahmad Ansari یوسف انصاری

Yusuf A Ahmad Ansari یوسف انصاری Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @yusufpore

Aug 19, 2023
I came across a copy of this personal letter during morning research exercises, written by Shahzada Aurangzeb (RA), to Mirza Rāja Jai Singh of Amber.
The date corresponds with late July, 1654 - therefore almost exactly four years before the Mughal War of Succession, of 1658.

Although a seemingly innocuous document, it highlights some interesting themes.
The letter accompanied two imperial guns (likely matchlocks), sent as a gift to the Mirza Rāja; “do qabzeh bandooq awwal ināyat namoōdeh’em”*

This demonstrates two things. The first is an aspect of Mughal - Rājput relations, namely the exchange of appropriate gifts between Imperial notables (note that at the time of writing this Aurangzeb RA was only a prince, Shah Jehan’s third-born son). In this case “bandooq-awwal” means a premium/top-ranking category of weapon.
Accompanying the guns is a “Jamdhar-e khaas” (special dagger) that is also mentioned.
The second aspect is Aurangzeb’s (RA), cultivation of important nobles and generals of the Mughal Empire, early on in his career.
While Dāra Shikoh, Shah Jehan’s heir-presumptive was notably arrogant, and renowned for his intemperate (even obnoxious) behaviour towards Mughal noblemen, Aurangzeb (RA), formed much closer bonds with them, as well as with common soldiery. This was apparent through his hands-on, field-focused work ethic, whether in camp or on campaigns.
That he supplemented an already garnered respect on the field of battle with additional gifts shows foresight, tact and diplomacy. An aspect that would serve him well in the War of Succession, in 1658.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 1, 2023
The entire narrative of attacks on pilgrims in Mewat yesterday, is a fiction and fabrication spun by RSS affiliates; the VHP, Bajrang Dal, Godi Media and social-media influencers to draw attention away from #Manipur, as well as from the ongoing opposition to the BJP government by… https://t.co/CCVWv4dbFftwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Before getting into details that blow the whole myth of #Muslim aggression in #Mewat, please see this video and do share and circulate it. It is an important exposé to connect the dots for what occurred, using footage engineered by #Hindutva foot-soldiers themselves.
The Braj-Mandal yātra or Vraja-Parikramā is an annual affair that has historically passed through #Nuh peacefully. The difference this time was it was hijacked and infiltrated by criminal and lumpen, vigilante elements of the Bajrang Dal and VHP, who prepared for disruption… https://t.co/i9iem5xabUtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Read 11 tweets
Mar 3, 2023
Today marks the 316th death-anniversary of Badshāh Muhi-ud Dīn Muhammad #Aurangzeb Alamgīr (R.A.).
His long reign (1658-1707) consolidated the largest and wealthiest land-empire in Indian #history and was arguably the most socially-diverse dispensation to ever rule #India.
Even critics of Aurangzeb (R.A.), such as the historian Sir Jadunath Sarkar concede, "Aurangzeb’s Indian empire was vaster than that of Ashoka, Samudragupta, & Harshavardhan”.
@Timurid_Mughal.

It was in his reign too that #Ladakh was amalgamated into the #Mughal empire.f
The reign of Aurangzeb (R.A.) was based on 3 pillars:

1. Military expansion.
2. Islamic jurisprudence and a centralised justice system.
3. Adherence to his Indo-Timurid heritage.

This helped consolidate his empire, but it also depended on his persona for sustained success.
Read 9 tweets
May 13, 2022
One obsessive fantasy common to all Sangh acolytes is their belief that Indian Muslims are entirely converted from Hinduism.
This fallacy - apart from being an obvious physical impossibility - is at odds with another myth; that Muslim upper-classes discouraged conversion to…



…protect their own (religion based) social status.
Both views are historically incorrect, and the belief that the millions of Muslims who mass-migrated to the Indian Sub-continent from outside, between the 8th and 18th centuries simply disappeared, is beyond-the-pale-ridiculous.
The advent of Islam in the north of the Indian Sub-continent is properly dated to 712 AD, through the conquest of Sindh by the 17 year old Arab general, Mohammad bin Qasim. His army and followers numbering some 15,000 (largely Arab) individuals, established a colony in Multan…
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(