Swiss Ramble Profile picture
Aug 29 42 tweets 31 min read
Following Bayern Munich’s imperious start to the season, on the back of 10 Bundesliga titles in a row, I thought it might be interesting to look at their finances, even though it’s been a while since they published their 2020/21 accounts #FCBayern
Despite the significant impact of COVID, #FCBayern “achieved sound financial results”, once again posting a pre-tax profit, though down from €17m to €5m (€2m after tax). Revenue (club definition) fell €54m (8%) from €698m to €644m, largely offset by €42m cut in expenses.
#FCBayern revenue hit by COVID driven reductions in match day, down €59m (83%) to €12m, and commercial, down €15m (4%) to €345m, while transfer income dropped €31m to €33m. Broadcasting rose €51m (25%) to €255m, mainly due to money deferred from extended 2019/20 season.
As a technical aside, #FCBayern definition of €644m revenue includes €33m income from player sales. If this is excluded, we get €611m operating revenue, which fell €23m (4%) from prior year’s €634m.
#FCBayern wage bill increased by €33m (10%) from €340m to €373m, while player amortisation also rose €7m (11%) to €69m. However, other expenses fell €82m (32%) to €172m, due to lower costs with games played behind closed doors, and depreciation was down €6m to €22m.
#FCBayern were one of only 3 clubs in the Bundesliga to post a profit in 2020/21, due to “sensible management and not spending more than we earn”, though their €5m was just below RB Leipzig’s €8m. Some clubs lost a huge amount of money, especially Hertha €78m and #BVB €73m.
Clearly COVID has had a significant detrimental effect on football club finances with #FCBayern CFO Jan-Christian Dreesen estimating the revenue loss as €155m, as games were played without fans in attendance, though this was partially offset by the lower cost of staging games.
#FCBayern €5m were one of a small number of European clubs that were profitable in 2020/21, along with #MCFC €6m and Real Madrid €2m. In stark contrast, other clubs had some staggering losses, including Juventus €208m, PSG €225m, Inter €239m and especially Barcelona €555m.
#FCBayern income from player sales almost halved, falling from €64m to €33m, mainly Thiago’s move to #LFC. This was partly due to the transfer market being depressed by COVID, though some clubs still made good money from player trading, e.g. Real Madrid €106m and #MCFC €77m.
Despite the decline in revenue as a result of the pandemic, #FCBayern “earned money in both years and that is a remarkable achievement”. In fact, the Bavarians have now been profitable for an amazing 29 years in a row, generating €241m pre-tax profit in the 4 years before COVID.
#FCBayern have become increasingly reliant on player trading. Although income fell to €33m in 2021, they earned an impressive €154m in the previous 2 years. Few big money sales in 2021/22 (Alaba left on a free), but this season was better, including Lewandowski to Real Madrid.
#FCBayern operating loss (excluding transfer income) narrowed from €50m to €25m, the smallest of clubs in Deloitte Money League. Most clubs lose money at this level, but some particularly large deficits in 2020/21, including Barcelona €509m, PSG €221m and Juventus €216m.
#FCBayern ongoing revenue has fallen by €49m (7%) in the last two years from the club’s €660m peak to €611m, due to the pandemic, which has reduced match day by €81m. The club definition of revenue, including transfer income, has dropped €107m (14%) in this period.
The revenue gap between #FCBayern and #BVB has narrowed in recent years, but was still as much as €274m in 2021 Put another way, Bayern’s €611m revenue was nearly 80% higher than Dortmund’s €338m, which is a huge difference between first and second ranked clubs in a country.
The Bundesliga releases figures for gross profit, which represents revenue (including transfer income) less cost of materials. This gives us some idea of the relative financial power of clubs with Bayern Munich leading the way €606m, far ahead of RB Leipzig €376m & #BVB €349m.
For the second year in a row #FCBayern retained 3rd place in the Deloitte Money League in 2021, with their €611m revenue only surpassed by #MCFC €645m and Real Madrid €641m. Only two other German clubs in the top 30: #BVB €338m and Borussia Mönchengladbach €178m.
However, it should be noted that German clubs were adversely impacted in 2020/21, as the Bundesliga completed its fixtures before the end of 2019/20, so all TV payments were booked in that season, while others (Premier League, Serie A & La Liga) deferred some revenue to 2020/21.
#FCBayern commercial income fell €15m (4%) from €360m to €345m, though the small decrease was a pretty good performance during the pandemic. In fact, this was the highest commercial revenue in Europe, ahead of PSG €337m, Real Madrid €322m and #MCFC €308m.
#FCBayern recently extended Deutsche Telekom shirt sponsorship to 2027, up from €45m to €50m. Similarly, Audi have renewed partnership to 2029 (€40m to €50m). Also have Adidas €60m kit deal to 2030, Qatar Airways sleeve sponsor €10m and Allianz stadium naming rights €6m.
#FCBayern broadcasting revenue rose €51m (25%) to €255m, a club record for this revenue stream, mainly from UEFA TV money, up €54m to €136m, due to income deferred for games played after 2019/20 accounting close. Still far below #MCFC €336m, due to low Bundesliga TV money.
Bundesliga TV money distribution uses 4 criteria: 5-year league performance ranking (70%); 5-year ranking for both divisions (23%); 20-year ranking (5%); and playing time of Germany U23s (2%). In 2020/21 #FCBayern received the highest in Germany with €105m, ahead of #BVB €95m.
The new Bundesliga domestic 4-year TV deal from 2021/22 will be 5% lower than current deal, though clubs said this represented a good outcome in the circumstances. Total €1.4 bln still third best in Europe, though a long way below Premier League €3.9 bln and La Liga €2.1 bln.
Before any revenue deferrals from 2019/20, #FCBayern earned €93m for reaching the Champions League quarter-finals, down from prior year’s €125m, when they beat PSG in the final to win the competition. Ahead of #BVB €79m, RB Leipzig €52m and Mönchengladbach €44m.
Worth noting the influence on Champions League money of UEFA coefficient payment (based on performances over 10 years), where #FCBayern had the second best ranking of all clubs, giving them €34m (#BVB €24m, Leipzig €10m and Mönchengladbach €8m). Only below Real Madrid €35m.
#FCBayern have earned a hefty €426m from Europe in the last 5 years, much more than other German clubs: #BVB €294m, RB Leipzig €171m, Leverkusen €111m and Mönchengladbach €84m. From 2021/22 the German TV rights were reportedly 70% higher (DAZN, Amazon & ZDF).
#FCBayern match day income (per the Money League definition) fell from €72m to just €12m, as all home games were played behind closed doors. This revenue stream was as high as €104m three years ago, i.e. before COVID.
#FCBayern had the second highest crowds in Germany in 2019/20 with 75,000 (for games played with fans), so would have been happy that stadiums re-opened last season, albeit at various stages attendances were capped at 25,000, while a few games were played without fans.
#FCBayern wage bill rose €33m (10%) from €340m to €373m, which means that wages have risen by €108m (41%) since 2017. One reason for the increase in 2021 was the players taking a voluntary salary cut in the previous season. By far the highest wages in Germany.
#FCBayern enjoy a major competitive advantage in Germany, as their €373m wage bill is a hefty €158m (73%) more than #BVB €216m, the highest ever gap. This difference is much higher than a similar comparison in England, Spain and Italy, only smaller than PSG’s lead in France.
Although #FCBayern executives have complained that “only clubs owned by billionaires can compete”, their €373m wage bill is not too shabby. In fact, it was the fifth highest in Europe in 2020/21, only beaten by PSG €503m, Barcelona €432m, #MCFC €401m and #CFC €376m.
#FCBayern wages to turnover ratio increased (worsened) from 54% to 61%, obviously impacted by COVID revenue losses, though this was still one of the best figures in Europe, only behind #THFC 57% and Real Madrid 58%, but miles better than the likes of PSG 88%.
#FCBayern player amortisation, the annual cost of writing-off transfer fees, rose 11% from €63m to €69m, though this was much lower than other leading European clubs, who spend much more in the transfer market, e.g. #CFC €183m, Juventus €177m and #MCFC €165m.
Based on Transfermarkt, #FCBayern have had €422m gross spend in the last 5 years (up to this summer’s transfer window), which is slightly higher than €393m in the preceding 5-year period. This season includes de Ligt (Juventus), Mané (#LFC), Tel (Rennes) and Gravenberch (Ajax).
#FCBayern €422m gross spend in last 5 years is just behind #BVB €425m and not too far ahead of RB Leipzig €376m, though their €162m net spend is highest in the Bundesliga, above Wolfsburg €139m & Hertha €69m. This might not seem a lot, but most German clubs have net sales.
#FCBayern bank debt (to finance the stadium) was paid off 16 years ahead of schedule in 2014, having been as high as €167m in 2009, while cash increased from €40m to €114m in 2021. The club’s traditional high liquidity helped them navigate the pandemic without taking on debt.
#FCBayern’s ability to compete at the highest levels while remaining debt-free is impressive, especially in comparison to some other elite clubs in Europe, such as #CFC €1.7 bln (Abramovich funding), #THFC €964m (new stadium) and #MUFC €599m (Glazers’ leveraged buy-out).
Having no interest payments has given #FCBayern a healthy competitive advantage. To place this into perspective, five leading clubs paid more than €20m interest in 2020/21: Barcelona €37m, Atletico Madrid €30m, #MUFC €23m, #THFC €20m and Inter €20m.
#FCBayern don’t separately report transfer debt, but assuming this to be 90% of Trade Creditors, this was unchanged at £54m for the third year in a row, less than half of €110m in 2016. The lowest amount owed of top European clubs, far below Juventus €265m and Barcelona €231m.
#FCBayern have been boosted by strategic partnerships with 3 major German companies (Adidas, Allianz & Audi), who all have an 8.33% stake in the club with the other 75% owned by the fans. Their sponsorships are worth €116m a year. Dividends cut from €15m to €3m due to COVID.
#FCBayern have been strong advocates of FFP rules. Should benefit from UEFA’s new squad cost control ratio of player wages, transfers & agent fees, limited to 70% of revenue & profit on player sales (implemented over 3 seasons: 90% in 2023/24, 80% in 2024/25 and 70% in 2025/26).
#FCBayern CFO said, “The club is on solid foundations, which have been steadily strengthened in recent years.” They have managed to ride out the challenges posed by COVID, while achieving an enviable balance between competitiveness on the pitch and financial sustainability.
Chief executive, Oliver Kahn, added, “In the Bundesliga at the moment we are very dominant at #FCBayern. But this is not our problem, this is a problem of our competitors.” That is undoubtedly true, but difficult for others to address, given Bayern’s huge financial advantages.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Swiss Ramble

Swiss Ramble Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SwissRamble

Aug 23
Following last night’s match between Manchester United and Liverpool, I thought it might be interesting to see how the finances of these clubs compare, particularly the direction of travel over the last 10 years (up to most recent accounts for the 2020/21 season) #MUFC #LFC
10 years ago #MUFC £320m revenue was nearly twice as much as #LFC £169m with the difference rising to a peak of £217m in 2017, but since then the gap has almost completely closed to only £7m with United’s £494m just ahead of #LFC £487m.
#LFC have earned more broadcasting income than #MUFC in each of the last four years, due to more success on the pitch, especially in Europe, where Liverpool’s exploits in the Champion League have generated much more TV money.
Read 19 tweets
Aug 22
Arsenal fans will be delighted with the team’s good start to the season, so are probably unconcerned about the financial implications of their player recruitment, but it is maybe worth looking at whether there will be any issues with Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations #AFC
As it stands, #AFC have spent a hefty £270m gross on transfers in the last 2 seasons, only surpassed by #CFC £288m, but ahead of #MUFC £255m, #MCFC £231m, #THFC £194m and #LFC £156m (though both #CFC and #MUFC will probably spend more on new players before the window closes).
Even more incredibly, #AFC net transfer spend of £218m is the highest of the Big Six in the last 2 seasons, just ahead of #CFC £217m. That is a fairly remarkable statistic for a club that has not competed in the lucrative Champions League since 2017.
Read 52 tweets
Aug 16
After Manchester United’s awful start to the season, the focus has once again turned to the Glazers. This thread will look at some of the reasons why the club’s fans might be unhappy with their owners – from a financial perspective #MUFC
#MUFC are the only Premier League club to pay dividends to their shareholders, mainly the Glazers. Since 2016 they have paid a hefty £166m, averaging £22m a year. Note: the high £33m payment in 2021/22 included including £11m delayed from 2020/21. Image
Although it has fallen from its (sizeable) peak, #MUFC £21m interest payment in 2020/21 was still the highest in the Premier League. United have now paid a staggering three-quarters of a billion pounds (£743m) in interest since the Glazers’ leveraged buy-out in 2005. ImageImage
Read 27 tweets
Aug 15
Chelsea have been spending big in this summer’s transfer window with their outlay likely to be well over £200m by deadline day. This thread will look at the financial implications and explain how #CFC can still be in line with Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations.
#CFC new owner Todd Boehly is well aware of the challenge: “FFP is starting to get some teeth and that will limit the ability to acquire players at any price. That could mean financial penalties and disqualification from sporting competitions.”
#CFC spending ability is limited by the Premier League Profitability and Sustainability (P&S) rules. These allow a £5m loss a year, which can be boosted by £30m equity injection, giving allowable losses of £35m a year. This works out to £105m over the 3-year monitoring period.
Read 47 tweets
Aug 8
When Newcastle United were bought by a consortium led by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, the expectation was that #NUFC would splash out on players, due to the enormous wealth of the new owners, but that hasn’t really been the case. So why is the club not spending big?
#NUFC manager Eddie Howe gave this answer: “Financial Fair Play impacts us and will continue to impact us for a number of years. We haven't got the free rein that maybe has been perceived within the media, that we can go and sign who we want and pay extortionate fees and wages.”
Despite the fact that #NUFC new owners had stated that their ambition was to win the Premier League in “five to ten years”, Howe sounded a note of caution, “We’re having to be creative and smart and try and make the right additions within the financial constraints that we have.”
Read 43 tweets
Aug 1
Salford City’s 2020/21 financial results covered a season that the club described as “unique” with the COVID pandemic leading to “extreme challenges”. Nevertheless, The Ammies’ 8th place in League Two was the best finish in their history #WeAreSalford
Salford City have been high-profile ever since the club was bought in 2014 by five of the #MUFC Class of ’92, namely Gary Neville, Ryan Giggs, Nicky Butt, Phil Neville and Paul Scholes. Singapore businessman (and Valencia owner) Peter Lim purchased a 50% stake in September 2014.
When they acquired Salford, the club was playing in the 8th tier of English football (the Northern Premier League Division One North), but they have secured four promotions since then, reaching the Football League for the first time in 2019.
Read 38 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(