@SplitTicket_ Of course, people could be wrong (and why it's Lean D, not safe). You may remember 2020, when this was the consensus and then every poll overshot Kelly's margin. But folks can only make decisions on resource allocation based on data they have, and Kelly is up by a fair amount.
@SplitTicket_ If you're Mitch McConnell and you see internals from *your own side* saying Tim Ryan is up by 4, do you (a) hold your fire in Ohio and continue spending in AZ to reverse a Kelly +8 lead? Or do you punt and then try to save Ohio?
@SplitTicket_ There's no right or wrong answer here, but most people do not play by the calculus of "only play for the tipping points" because the size of majorities matters for future chambers too -- this is not a presidential race, where winning a state one year doesn't directly impact 2024.
@SplitTicket_ Without more money, Masters has almost no shot. And so I think he gets some more $ from McConnell and *maybe* Thiel after a lot of pressure, and that keeps him in it till election day, where we probably enter with Kelly as a favorite, but where a Masters victory is very plausible
@SplitTicket_ *BUT* the size of the buy probably won't be nearly as high as it would have been otherwise, and more importantly, a lot of time has been lost for Masters in this fiasco. Kelly's now defined him already -- IMO he is favored and Masters now has to play catch-up. But he could do it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Women are ~20 points more Democratic than men are, but this gap didn't really exist until the Reagan GOP ran with the anti-Equal Rights Amendment tilt in 1980.
@dhaaruni@SplitTicket_ It's worth pointing out that when candidates make horrific gaffes like Akin and his "legitimate rape" comment in Missouri, the blowback is usually concentrated among women (surprise!). McCaskill got 58% among women, 51% with men. Obama got 45% with women, 43% with men.
@dhaaruni@SplitTicket_ Similarly, when you look at data from @tbonier and @TargetSmart, the post-Dobbs picture of increased enthusiasm among women becomes quite clear. Unsurprisingly, when one group feels that a right of theirs is threatened, they react strongly against the party they hold responsible.
A pretty cool milestone: @SplitTicket_ just hit 100K views this year, and it's just August!
I know we say this a lot, but for an outlet that was just created in a space full of political sites, it's really quite surreal. Thank you to everyone for supporting and reading us!
@SplitTicket_ We're at 105K views in only 8 months this year. None of this would be possible without everyone reading our articles, giving us feedback, joining our spaces, or RT'ing us. And a special thanks especially to the following...
In April, I wrote a piece for @SplitTicket_ discussing why any Biden approval rebound would have to mainly be centered around pulling independents back in.
Gallup's August poll has Biden going from 78% to 81% with Dems, but 31 to 40 with independents
@SplitTicket_ It is important to note that as much as Biden's big-ticket legislation appears to have helped Democrats generate enthusiasm within the fold, the bigger reason for his overall approval bounce *at the moment* really does seem to be because independents approve of him more. Why?
@SplitTicket_ I have some hypotheses, but no concrete answers.
Firstly, the economic conditions improved. Inflation is declining, as are gas prices, but job growth remains high.
Secondly, the legislation passed is quite popular, and this significantly helps perceptions of competency.
Why do I hold Alito as somewhat responsible here? Because while Palin's horrid favorables are what will make this race that close, the Democrats would IMO really never have gotten this level of turnout or that many first-place votes without the Dobbs decision.
Biden got 42.8% of votes in Alaska. I think Peltola will end up at around 40 when it's all said and done. That's very close to Biden's 2020 vote share despite a moderate Republican with a big name (Begich) running here.
This isn’t as big of an outlier as people think, in some way. Emerson has Trump +5 and Oz underruns that by 9. They have the generic ballot at R+1 — Oz underruns it by 5. When you look at the candidate effects, the same story is being told.
I don’t think it’s worth discarding the poll, and I also don’t think it’s worth discarding all the others that show Fetterman up double digits, given the volume of them we’ve gotten. Whether you believe this or not is a function of how Republican you think the final electorate is
I don’t have much of an opinion on this beyond “interesting poll, continues to show Oz has serious problems as a candidate overall, and is probably much closer to the final result than Fetterman +13, but just average them instead of cherry-picking what to use and what not to use”
Following a slew of Democratic overperformances (#NY19, #NY23, #MN01, #NE01) and a polling surge for them post-Dobbs, we have some ratings changes @SplitTicket_ to announce.
#WISen: Lean R -> Tossup #PASen: Tossup -> Lean D #AZSen: Tossup -> Lean D
@SplitTicket_ I'm not saying Oz can't win. Nor am I saying Masters cannot. I'm simply saying that you cannot create a credible case at the moment to say either of those two candidates is favored, and that's what you'd need to keep a race at a tossup. Rs have a chance, but Ds have the edge.
@SplitTicket_ I will not be moving NH until the primary. If Bolduc wins, #NHSen is Likely Democratic.
Anyways, I'm sure this will produce well-reasoned, good-faith discourse!