So, as there is a growing debate on whether the #KhersonOffensive is a success or failure, I try to weight in a bit. In short, it is too early to tell. But expectations have been too high anyway, and likely to be disappointed because of that. @ecfr@ECFRWiderEurope
First, some general remarks on where we are in the war.
π·πΊ has not yet lost its offensive momentum. Attacks on Bachmut and surroundings were still going on. Allthough they produced little results, they still bog down a lot of πΊπ¦ ressources.
Take a look at @JominiW's map from mid-August. THe most formidable πΊπ¦ armoured formations are still in the Donbas. No major re-deployments to Kherson have happened. I think only one or two tank battalions from brigades shown here.
When the offensive started on August 29th, Ukrainians did not have a nummerical or firepower superiority to force a breakthrough and shatter the Russians. Rather they identified weaknesses and poor coordination in the Russian defensive perimiter, they throught to exploit.
This is a difficult thing to pull: success rests on Russian misakes, rather than Ukrainian strength. If π·πΊ orderly withdraws to a second line, they will contain the offensive. If πΊπ¦ can keep the enemy moving, they have advantages of better coordination and leadership.
My humble view: π·πΊ have managed to orderly mann a second line, that will make it very difficult to advance further for πΊπ¦.
Still, π·πΊ have used a lot of ammunition in the past days, and supply routes to the front are difficult to say the least.
Especially if π·πΊ continues to drive counter-attacks, they may again over-extend their forces.
This may provide opportunities for πΊπ¦ to exploit. But it is impossible to predict.
Another observation: look at the @TheStudyofWar maps on the progress. Only mechanised formations achieved break-throughs: the 5th tank/60th motor in the North, 63rd Mech in the centre, 28th Mech in the South.
Without armour, you are screwed in this terrain.
This is unfortunately what Ukraine lacks. πΊπ¦ has lost roughly half of its MBT by now, even π΅π± deliveries of 250+ tanks could not make up for it.
Even more dramatic is the loss and lack of IFV. BMP-1/2 are not survivable, burn with their entire crews.
But still better than getting butchered by artillery on the open field.
Every tincan in the West needs to make its way to πΊπ¦! In March I thought we could pool M-113 from various πΊπΈπͺπΊ armies and have a single logistics and supply chain. Little has materialised, too few delivered.
We see entire infantry platoons on foot trying to hide between one M-113 crossing a field. We see infantry in AND on top of vehicles, because there are too few. All of that impedes the speed of advance and causes casualties. It can only be cured by more vehicles.
And at the end, please do not forget to donate to the πΊπ¦ armed forces.
It has been a while, attention decreases. Let's have a look into all our wallets whether we can spare a dime. bank.gov.ua/en/news/all/naβ¦
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So as I get asked whether this is a sign that πΊπ¦ got MGM-140 ATACMS, I'd say not yet. It might also the the Ukrainian Grom(-2) missile as well, however it had to rely un US delivered Anti-Radiation Missiles to poke a hole in π·πΊ air defences.
People in Western Europe often forget that πΊπ¦ was an integral part of the Soviet space and missile effort, some of the finest scientists and rockets comming from there. That knowledge is not entirely gone...
Development of an Iskander look a like solid propellant missile, with roughly equivalent payload and range, started under Janukowycz, however the programme produced few results other than schemes to move money around amongst his friends. It was known as "Sapsan".
1οΈβ£ Yes, the Leopard 1 is outdated compared to more modern π·πΊ MBT, but the chance of encountering them is shrinking.
2οΈβ£ While outdated as MBT, the Leopard1 still makes a useful fire support vehicle: an accurate gun and good optics.
It will have to be used more cautiously than an MBT, due to thin armour. However, it doesn't burn like a matchbox if hit.
From the start of the war, πΊπ¦ has conducted a mobile defence. For this, you need armoured reserves.
Wartime attrition has put into question whether UA will sustain its armoured reserves. π΅π± provided MBT critically important.
But armoured transportation was/is still an issue. BMP-1 are not very survivable, pretty much anything from the West is better than that.
So glad π«π· stepps up here, after π¦πΊπ³π±πΊπΈ also provided MRAP & APC.
1/ A short update tweet on where we are on the π·πΊπΊπ¦ war. A lot to do for @ecfr, and our next #twitterspace will be about different things ... so here wer are.
Last week π·πΊ repaired the railway connection into #Izyum and you immediately see the results.
2/ Further offensives from Izyum towards #Sloviansk are expected in the comming days. This will make πΊπ¦ positions in #Severodonestk even more vulnerable.
Renewed π·πΊ attacks on #Bakhmut were repelled so far, but breakthroughs may happen any day. Any of them will force ...
3/ πΊπ¦ to retreat to the #Sloviansk - #Kramatorsk line. When this happens is hard to predict, but it can happen by tomorrow. A lot of prepared positions there, so this again should hold up π·πΊ for weeks.
Finally, there are also positive surprises comming out of Berlin, and this one is huge. @Bundeskanzler announced πΊπ¦ will get #IrisT-SLM air defence missile.
Why is this so impiortant? faz.net/aktuell/politiβ¦
πΊπ¦ needs an air defence capability above 3000m altitude. Otherwise the Russian Aerospace force will just fly high and avoid MANPADS (Singer, Igla & Grom).
Flying high degrades accuracy, but RuAF give little about collateral damage anyway.
For the time being, πΊπ¦ uses Soviet era S-300 and Buk-M1 for this job. Remarkably well by the way.
But there are limited stocks of ammunition, and very few systems in the West. Ukraine will run dry on these systems over the summer.
1/ So after a long time a wrap up tweet on where we are in the π·πΊ>πΊπ¦ war. I wanted to do this a long time ago, esp. as our last @ecfr twitter space was some time in the past. But this π delayed everything a bit.
2/ Russian breakthrough near #Popansa yesterday a shark reminder that the #Donbas offensive is still ongoing. πΊπ¦ hold most lines, but such breakthroughs are always possible as long as the offensive is going on.
3/ However, I would not start to draw encirclement circles (something quitre fashionable in recent months). πΊπ¦ have been expecting this and prepared lines in the rear. We'll see in the next days if they can stabilise the situation with reserves.