Here is a twist, I am getting the "@K_G_Andersen treatment". 😂😂
Stick around, it is a teaching lesson.
#Lableak trolls just realized that I thought a leak plausible when I entered the discussion right after the Nicholas Wade Op-ed, and think that is a 'gotcha'
1/
I have often proclaimed that I came late to the discussion, and also, that I was initially favoring #lableak, just based on my personal experience with how quickly lab accidents might happen.
When the Wade Op-ed hit, I thought well, respectable outlet, maybe its true? 2/
It certainly felt intuitive.
But here comes the lesson:
I did not want to leave it to my #intuition, I wanted to know the #truth.
Very soon (~2 weeks) after, I realized that the scientific #evidence tells a very different story, even at a time when uncertainty was higher. 3/
Having been a bit annoyed at myself how easily I fell to the shoddy manipulative Nicholas Wade article, I decided to collect my thoughts and write a debunk #scicomm article. 🔽
In that, I addressed Wade's main arguments, all of which were garbage.
My blog article was published in June 21, mere weeks after the Wade article came out.
I guess my little #origin story (😅) shows that even a trained scientist can be fooled by intuition and #misplaced trust.
More importantly, however, it should show that once scientific 5/
evidence becomes available (or one is made aware of it), that we ought to #change our mind with the evidence.
It should also show that this can happy very #quickly, in my case, a few weeks
Now let's return to our dear #lableak proponents, who, after spending years commenting
6/
still have not managed to look at the #evidence (which has become overwhelming in ruling out all #lableak scenarios)
They are perpetually stuck in #talking points from early 2020, desperate to the sad point of quote mining me a few hours ago to feed their #confirmation bias
7/
Not realizing that they actually just achieved the opposite, confirming my #authenticity in the endeavor while exposing their ineptitude. 😂
I hope they will use this little thread as #inspiration to look at the evidence, and maybe find it in themselves to go with it too.
8/
Again, it is not bad to change one's mind when the #evidence demands it, it is laudable. Everybody should do it.
There is no #shame in changing one's mind, the wonderful thing about having a belief disproven by science is that it #freed us of a bad idea.
That's it.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The anti-vaccine movement became a juggernaut during COVID-19 by exploiting people's anxieties & profiting from their fears
Because emotional manipulation is politically valuable, republicans soon merged with the ideology
Unfortunately, that caused over 200k Americans to die
2/
... just during the delta wave alone.
Given estimates of 1,4 million excess deaths since 2020, half of it after vaccines became available, the odds are that vaccine-preventable death toll was even higher.
A huge political liability for Republicans if voters woke up to that.
3/
I don't know, but I feel like the cool kids don't get sucked into magical worldviews and waste their time live-action roleplaying as "investigators" in trite conspiracy myths.
Which makes all of those in the media who fall for them, over and over again, kinda embarassing?
There is no version of the lab leak idea that does not assume conspiratorial elements, given the evidence we have today.
There is no lab leak "theory" in the first place, just innuendo and magical thinking with mutual contradictory ideas that can not explain available evidence
Given the overwhelming evidence for a zoonotic origin, the scientific case is long clear.
What remains of the lab leak is a zombie idea, a myth kept alive by, sorry to say, mostly science deniers, activists, media manipulators and too many suckers that keep amplifying it.
During the election season, discourse manipulators and influence campaigns work overtime to mislead citizens about scientific topics.
Here are 18 common tactics explained, why it works, and why you should guard yourself against it.
A 🧵
1/
First up are the merchants of doubt
They use an array of manipulation techniques to denounce experts with various smear tactics, deny a scientific consensus exists, and deceive the public with irrelevant stories.
They distort scientific arguments by turning them into partisan fights, discredit proponents of an evidence-based worldview & dismiss the scientific method with appeals to intuition
Conspiracy theorists are shocked to learn that a science blogger writing about the bat origins of SARS-CoV-2 visits field sampling expeditions to interview bat researchers 😅
Good journalistic practice must be a nefarious plot 🤣
A niche 🧵 about conspiratorial ideation
1/
Yesterday, I posted the above fotos to explain that my writing is based on expert interviews, personal research experience, scientific analysis and of course legwork.
Conspiracy theorists have claimed since 2022 that I must be a "paid" shill; from China, Biden, Fauci or EHA
2/
For them, the idea that somebody could keep speaking up for science and scientists because he believes it is the right thing (& despite their hardest efforts to bully me out of the conversation with harassments), is unthinkable.
I) SARS-CoV-2 has a mosaic genome that could only have come about through viral #recombination with other bat viruses in the wild.
No laboratory procedure or experiment can create, fake, or simulate this natural process.
Design is out of the question
It was once a bat virus
2/
II) #Recombination does not have the granularity to exclude all genetic tinkering approaches, such as single AA mutations in the RBD to make it better bind human cells
Turns out, hACE2 affinity in SARS-CoV-2 was not designed either, but 100% natural
It is a critically important election year, so the Biden WH can not afford to have this emotional issue with large visibility be a differentiator between the parties.
They have to act as the ones driving accountability so the Republicans can not weaponize it against them
2/
No party or politician gives a hoot about Ecohealth Alliance, it is a small non-profit with no political weight or power
Cutting off its funding makes politicians look good; they can pretend to hold "bad people" accountable in a bi-partisan fashion & not ruffle many feathers