KSR Profile picture
Sep 21 13 tweets 3 min read
So, now that the ban on the use of #saliva on a #cricket ball is permanent, it's literally the end of an era where seam bowling is concerned.

Can't help but recollect a priceless conversation I had with the one-&-only -- Wasim Akram -- some years ago on this subject.

+
It was some promotional event and I found myself in conversation with the man. He, I thought, was in the mood to chat too.

And when he's in the mood to talk, I can tell you from that personal experience, you'll want to keep everything aside and just listen.

+
So, I listened.

"Ball jo banta tha... usme do main factors hote the. Saliva aur shine...

"Delivery khatm hone ke baad... ball ek specific route se waapis aata tha -- wicket-keeper se slip, slip se gully ya point, wahan se cover ya mid-off, & back to the bowler...

+
Translation:

"There were two major factors in "making of the ball" -- saliva & shine.

"After the delivery got completed, it would return to the bowler via a specific, predetermined route -- wicket-keeper to slip to gully or point to cover or mid-off and back to the bowler".

+
"Aur wohi specific fielders hote the jinhe ball shine karne ki responsibility di jaati thi...

"Agar aap ko woh responsibility nahi di gayi ho aur aapke haath mein ball aa jaye, toh aap ko chup chaap use aage forward kar dena hai..."

+
Translation:

"There were specific fielders who would be responsible for shining the ball. If there was a fielder who wasn't given that responsibility & the ball came to him 'by mistake', all he had to do was forward it to the fielder responsible... and not do anything else".

+
"Ek baar ball ek fielder ke paas chali gayi aur uska kaam nahi tha shine karne ka... lekin usne saliva use kiya aur ball ko trouser pe shine kiya...

"Maine usse kaha, agar agli baar ye hua toh tu dressing room mein baithega..."

+
Translation:

"Once, the ball went to a fielder who wasn't supposed to use saliva on it or shine it.

"But he began doing it nonetheless and I told him -- next time I see you doing this, you'll be sitting in the dressing room".

+
He told me the the fielder's name too, but I'm not sure if the name I remember is actually the one -- therefore not using the name.

Also, the conversation happened years ago, so where I've quoted Wasim may not exactly be in verbatim. But it's the exact gist...

+
So, it was a machine like process. Regardless of whether the batsman played the ball or left it, the ball would come back to the wicket-keeper, and then follow a certain direction before it reached the bowler again....

+
And during this process, the exactly fielders chosen to shine the ball would apply Saliva exactly where Wasim wanted it and then shine it cherry-red.

The ball would start getting "ready".

This was the beauty of the 90s. Wonder if cricket will ever see that magic again.

+
In another conversation -- this was post-pandemic -- the great Sachin Tendulkar once spoke at leisure about the possible replacements for saliva and what can be potentially done.

This was when Covid had just begun to disrupt our lived and saliva had been first banned.

+
That I'll keep for another day.

When Wasim Akram retired, there were many great headlines to honor the man. But my favorite was one that appeared in Mid-Day -- a tabloid in Mumbai.

"WASIM BYE".

Wasim bhai was a one-&-only.

##

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with KSR

KSR Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KShriniwasRao

Sep 18
Tim David's long-awaited dream to play for Australia is about to come true. That's interesting.

What's more interesting is this...

No country outside of England & Australia have greater history associated with the game.

+
And, in line with it, no country outside of England, Australia -- and now India -- have a more robust First Class domestic structure, a feeder-line to their national teams and a well-defined circuit at their disposal.

+
Outside of what is a "dream-come-true" for a cricketer from an "associate nation", a country as seeped into the game as Australia allowing an "outsider" to wear their colors is a hugely significant move.

Repercussions -- both, good & otherwise -- will have a lasting impact.

+
Read 8 tweets
Sep 7
Some observations I thought I'll share.

* In current form & touch, KL can't belong in this XI.
* Surya must be India's No.3 without hesitation.
* So, if that means VK has to open, then so be it.

+
* Whether it's Ro & VK at the top or any change in guard, a strike rate of below 150 from top-3 is just not warranted.
* Whether it's Pant or Sanju or Ishan -- or a combination of them -- let them know if they figure in the team plans & how. But, stop these musical chairs.

+
* If they figure, stick with them.
* Pursue with Hooda.
* If Chahar is fit, he needs to be around. That'll mean probably taking a call betwn him & Bhuvi.
* Give Hardik more responsibility & game time.
* If Jadeja won't go to Australia, start figuring resources now.

+
Read 4 tweets
Aug 29
A #thread on Disney's #ICC Media Rights bid:

👉🏽 Disney bid value: US$3.04B (approx Rs 24,000 cr).

👉🏽 Second highest bid: Sony at US$1.35b (approx Rs 10,000 cr).

👉🏽 Bid was for the India sub continent markets, 95% of which revolves around consumption in India alone.

+
👉🏽 A general ICC assumption is, the Indian subcontinent alone generates close to 70% of their broadcast revenues.

👉🏽 So does that mean Disney's winning bid of US$3.04b is potentially just around 70% of what ICC will make from sale of rights in other territories?

+
👉🏽 Not really. Why? Because the delta between the winning bid and the second highest one is extremely huge and the narrative is highly skewed in favour of Disney massively overpaying for it already.

👉🏽 Let's stick to Indian subcontinent. US$3.04b for how many matches? 179.

+
Read 16 tweets
Jul 27
#Thread -- Cricket's latest war

Subject: T20 Leagues.
Countries involved: South Africa & UAE.
Nature of conflict: Fight for window & players.
Affected parties: Cricket boards around the world.
Solution: Not found yet.

Let's deep dive...

+
Cricket South Africa & Emirates Cricket Board, both have their own T20 Leagues coming up next year.

Both want the leagues to be played between Jan & early Feb.

Both are in a rush to sign players.

Catch? Same set of players can't play in both leagues.

Why? Dates clash.

+
Why can't they play in separate windows?

-- Annual calendar is packed.
-- Weather needs to be kept in mind.
-- IPL takes away 3 months annually.
-- ICC has a world event every year.
-- Cricket boards have bilateral commitments.

There's no other window. Get the point?

+
Read 24 tweets
Jul 19
Changing world of cricket

#Thread

Back after an unforeseen break & so much has happened these last 7 days. Surprises, shockers & more!

A variety of developments took place & highly consequential too – from onset of T20 leagues to players retiring & broadcast wars.

(1/25)
Let’s take it one by one. First the shocker.

Sony had first rights of refusal to Cricket Australia (CA) rights by virtue of current contract.

They presented to CA that they’d be interested in renewing subcontinent rights. This was immediately after IPL rights.

(2/25)
No other broadcasters had shown interest until then. Sony had bagged it and CA was supposed to present it to their board.

Step in Disney – the broadcaster that had pulled out of England & Australia rights during previous cycle, wanted it back & offered a bigger cheque.

(3/25)
Read 25 tweets
Jun 16
#IPL #NFL

Laying bare some comparisons...

A short #Thread

After the recent #IPLMediaRights auction, the value of a single game touched US$15.1m (US$6.2b for a total of 410 games). That's Rs 118 cr per game (total of Rs 44,390 cr for 410.)

+
In doing so, the per-match value in IPL crossed the per-match value of the English Premier League (EPL). That bit is right. EPL per-match value at present exchange stands at US$11m.

At 380 games, that's a total of US$12b for a three-year rights cycle.

But fair enough.

+
However, the comparisons with NFL (at US$17m per game) are not correct. There are some calculation errors on the chart.

We have been making an enormous mistake in determining the value of the NFL rights from a per-match perspective.

+
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(