Nick Norwitz Profile picture
Sep 24 17 tweets 5 min read
1/ This is true, but for those who are interested deserves some unpacking. Short thread… Here we go…

Yes, insulin resistance is a stronger risk marker than elevated LDL-C. This can be quantified as lipoprotein insulin resistance (LP-IR).
2/ in the largest prospective trial to date (WHS, median follow-up was 21.4 years. N=28 024 women aged >45 years). LP-IR had an adjusted hazards ratio of 6.4 for coronary disease, as compared to 4.3 for obesity 3.9 for smoking and only 1.3 for LDL-C.

jamanetwork.com/journals/jamac…
3/ in other words, there was ~ 540% increase in coronary disease risk with insulin resistance but only ~30-40% for LDL-C. Furthermore, there was likely an interaction between terms as the association didn’t hold for large LDL but was driven by small LDL, which is associated w/ IR
4/ HOWEVER… IT’S important to distinguish between causative and non-causative risk markers/factors, and also the “actionability” of various markers. Taking LDL-C as a poor man’s proxy for LDLp/ApoB we can also say that ApoB particles are part of the causal pathway in ASCVD
5/ otherwise put, ApoB particles are NECESSARY (albeit no sufficient) for ASCVD to occur.

Thus, by keeping numbers low, one can reduce the development of plaques… all things being equal. This isn’t in debate; it's a fact.

But things continue to get more messy or 'nuanced'…
6/ Because all things are never equal in clinical medicine. If one could flip a magic switch and lower ApoB without any further consequences, IMHO, I'd go for it!

But to lower ApoB requires an intervention of sorts which carries different consequences for different persons...
7/ For example, LDL lowering medications (ezetimibe, statins, PCSK9i) can effectively lower ApoB in many. But, like all drugs, they can have side effects. Are statins the snake poison SM makes them out to be? No, I don't think so. But are they, 100% benign? ...
8/ Well, it depends on who you are. There's certainly an individual response, and some people may additionally benefit from their anti-inflammatory properties, etc. However, others could have side effects, even if the serious side effects are, admittedly, rare.
9/ As some of you may know, I personally chose not to medicate for highly elevated LDL-C/ApoB, but that's NOT because I think LDL-C medications are across the board bad. I could easily argue they are a postive marvel of modern medicine, if prescribed to the right patients...
10/ My PERSONAL decision is a product of a careful consideration of MY reading of the lit, my metabolic and genetic profile/risk of other disease processes, family hx, functional testing (CCTA). Your considerations are different; thus, my decision doesn't generalize to you.
11/ And while this thread evidently is not "short" as a promised, I'd be remiss if I didn't hit upon the topic of #LMHR -- these are a unique group of individuals with carbohydrate-restriction induced elevations in LDL-C/APoB to het/homo FH levels with LDL-C 200-700+ mg/dL
12/ In #LMHR the dominant factor driving the elevated LDL-C/ApoB is possibly (my best guess) metabolic in nature and related to depletion of glycogen stores; and, thus, can be reversed with carbohydrates. I.e. instead of a drug, you could "medicate" with a sweet potato per day
13/ I bring up LMHR because they provide an interesting example of how different patient cases may require different management, to highlight how much we still DON'T know, and to emphasize that in different patients a given intervention comes with different costs...
14/ For example, if an LMHR has epilepsy treated with ketosis, that sweet potato may reduce ApoB at the expense of increase seizure frequency; however, in an LMHR using a KD recreationally, eating a sweet potato per day may lower ApoB with almost no down side.
15/ Wrapping up:
Yes, insulin resistance is a stronger risk marker for CVD than LDL-C

Also yes, LDL is a causative agent in CVD and lowering it reduces risk

Interventions required to lower ApoB, and their benefits, vary person to person

Ie No 2 patients are the same... 'duh'
16/ Let me know what you think of this spew (please be respectful). Was it helpful?

Also, I will be having an editorial come out in a respected Lipid Journal, with a power-cast of co-authors in November on the topic of managing LDL-C on ketogenic diets. Stay tuned...
17/ Nick says, “time for a short thread” … 16 tweets later…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Norwitz

Nick Norwitz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nicknorwitz

Sep 11
Are you more knowledgeable that a Nutritionist?!

Doing a nutrition/metabolism knowledge survey of healthcare trainees.

Piloted these 10Q on 5 different nutritionists. Highest score was 70%!

Let’s see how YOU do…
1/ Gluten is which of the following macronutrients?
2/ Which of the following foods has the lowest proportion of fat as monounsaturated fat?
Read 14 tweets
Aug 21
1/ Have you seen the New Non-Nutritive sweeteners paper in Cell making the rounds!?! Fantastic!

Here's a video rundown:

And this thread contains a brief tweetorial...
2/ This study took 120 young health people who didn't consume non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) and broke them into 6 groups, n = 20/group
👉 Control (no supplement)
👉 Glucose
👉 Sacchrin
👉 Sucralose
👉 Aspartame
👉 Stevia
7 day baseline, 14 day exposure, and 7 day follow-up
3/ There was a clear individualized response across NNS, with Sucralose and Saccharin having the largest impact on glucose tolerance on oral glucose tolerance test.

There were "responders" (who had worse glucose tolerance in response to NNS) and also non-responders.
Read 11 tweets
Aug 15
🚨NEW PAPER! CGM for Med Students🚨

We provided @harvardmed students w @dexcom CGM

Students reported

👉Improved appreciation for metabolic health

👉Wearing CGM will help them better serve patients

👉Disappointed in standard dietary advice

Cont ⬇️
journals.sagepub.com/eprint/CXUGZCT… Image
2/ The story behind this study started back in the fall, when a grass-roots group of my peers expressed interest in designing a "Metabolic Health Immersion" program to help us learn about how lifestyle impacts metabolism and health... Image
3/ 40 students wore CGM for 10-40 days, and a subgroup also engaged in journal clubs, patient panels, dietary tracking, and took intake and completion questionnaires with qualitative and quantitative components 👇 Image
Read 9 tweets
Aug 8
1/ Medical Case
👉53y M, #LMHR w LDL 394, HDL 111, TG 40 for 4y on #keto diet
👉BMI 21.6
👉Prior to keto LDL was 98 mg/dl
👉CCTA shows no plaque, CAD-RADS = 0
👉Parents both lived to >80y w/o cardiac events Family hx of neurodegenerative diseases, including 2x of 👉Parkinson’s
2/ Patient doesn’t want to abandon diet because it makes them “feel my best.”

You’ll notice, there’s no poll associated with this case. Medicine isn’t a democracy and not all medical opinions on Twitter are equally informed. However, I wanted to share this case ...
3/ ...as a juxtaposition to the extremism I’m seeing ON BOTH SIDES: LDL/ApoB is benign v. lower is better (period). Neither is the case. A bit of nuance…

With respect to “LDL/ApoB is benign,” all things being equal, the data don’t support this view. It’s a risk factor...
Read 8 tweets
Jul 9
💩Another Weekend Paper Talk 8 min! 💩
This 1 about New 2022 research on 2... FIBER
👉 Impact of *specific* fibers in human subjects

👉 One fiber, but not other, lowers #Cholesterol

👉 High dose inulin fiber can cause inflammation🔥

VIDEO 👉👉
2/ 2:45 I talk about how 30g inulin/d can increase inflammatory markers and markers of liver damage, here are those data. Look at the pink arrows and I explain what's going on.
3/ At 3:38 I discuss how Arabinoxylan fiber specifically, but not inulin fiber lowers LDL #cholesterol. You can see that very clearly here as the red line represents a plummeting of LDL vs. green line no real change. They are both fibers, but differentially impact lipids
Read 6 tweets
Jul 6
🚨1/ New Study shows SARSCoV2 reprograms fat metabolism 🚨
#Covid_19 #metabolism

⬆️ Triglycerides

⬆️ PUFA ⬇️ Saturated fat

Blockade❌of fat synthesis blocks viral production
nature.com/articles/s4146…
2/ For a more detail...

Lipids & associated proteins have previously been identified as biomarkers of infection, including VLDL, HDL and various apolipoproteins, while both TAG and (serum) PUFA have been implicated as markers of severe disease outcomes

But what this paper adds
3/ Is an investigation (using mostly HEK293T-ACE2 and A549-ACE2 cells) of how the virus alters the lipidome and the importance of these changes in viral proliferation ... They found virus ⬆️TAGs, and PUFA chains were 2-8-fold more than saturated or monounsaturated species ...
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(