When @ASPDallas shows up in an article you know it's, as the kids say, fire!
lolz . . . literal lolz
These solutions are interesting but to me this just highlights the conflicts between the business/marketing of higher ed and and the public good/pubic service is profound.
Maybe I should make a curated reading list for each item in this chart...
#HateRead candidate: 1. Its town and country writing about college 2. data analysis seems suspect and incomplete 3. unacknowledged focus on highly rejectives
Reputational rankings rose in popularity at magazines. It was a way to sell mags. There was no govermental of political inteference to force transparency or changes.
1924 – NC Association of Schools and Colleges ask for faculty opinion
1934 – American Council of Education
The latest test publisher marketing gimmicks is test scores help you "stand out" but by the nature and design of standardized testing at least 50% will NOT STAND OUT.
"When our powers combine. . . "
we'll convince students that testing will help you stand out.
My latest article explores the history of and why it's time to end the of the 51 year SAT/ACT "experiment" at the University of California. lnkd.in/grvz7apt
A few interesting tidbits I didn't add to the article.
1950s - the University was confronting serious problems associated with growth. The GI Bill had increased enrollments significantly and the baby boom generation had entered the school system. The goal was 12.5% eligibility
1960 - BOARS concluded that the study did not indicate any additional predictive power associated with the SAT. A subsequent study of showed a better correlation with FGPA, but not enough to convince the Academic Assembly of the value of adopting an admissions test requirement