Part 2: Near and Longer Term Ukrainian Armor needs. To start some caveats. 1. I don't know the average bridge loading of Ukrainian bridges, 2. how many (if any) class 70 AVLB and bailey bridges they have 3. the maximum width of track vehicles on Ukranian trains. 4. Ukraine
uses the 4 tank platoon doctrinally. 5. Ukraine may have lost as many as half its pre-war tank fleet of mostly T-64BV tanks. 6. The main combat formation is the brigade. With all that said let's dig in. I think its obvious that I think that the big western MBT's are superior for
a number of reasons from crew efficiency, to sensing and FCS but also gun power. One of the big oft overlooked draw backs of the T series tanks is two piece ammo. This limits the overall L/D ratio of the sabots and this impacts performance. NATO APFSDS penetrators extend down
through the propellant and can be almost a meter long giving them a very efficient L/D ratio. Think performance between a cloth yard arrow and a stubby crossbow bolt. Up close it doesn't really matter but at range... Further older Soviet APFSDS were bore riding and incredibly
draggy but newer rounds use a spool style sabot allowing smaller fins on the darts along NATO lines to help preserve energy. I don't doubt that if the supporting infrastructure was there from mechanics and stores to bridges and bridging gear American Abrams or Leopard 2's
substituted for T series tanks would have seen the recent counter offensives go from smashing success to something akin to Iraq 91 redux. The Russians would not have just been smashed but completely over run and destroyed. Post 91 the Soviets and then the Russians claimed Western
success was not due to a generational leap in capabilities but due to Iraq's lack of skill and use of "monkey" models that were downgraded for export. Now 7 months into the largest turret tossing competition ever seen we know that was a lie
We also know that no one has supplied these awesome machines to Ukraine. Instead she was given T-72's and has managed to capture a huge amount of Russian kit. I think this is in part practical. Without the pre-existing infrastructure taking a tank that is 30+% heavier into combat
limits operations to dry weather where there are not rivers to cross. There is a lot of Ukraine in Russian hands behind rivers. Why make it harder to conduct operations. Yes this means that more Ukrainians are going to die in brewed up T-series tanks but since Ukraine at this
likely has more "modern" tanks than Russia and uses them in a base 2 (4 tank platoon) manner doctrinally I think being able to sustain offensive operations over the longer term is superior to a couple of breakthrough brigades that get stuck at water crossings or get stopped by
mechanical attrition/ run out of ammo because there are not enough spares, mechanics and logistics support. The trade off for more dead Ukrainian tankers is the ability to sustain operations to free more Ukrainians from the rape, torture and murder they face while being occupied.
to this end, I think this is where the West should focus in the short term: keep the T tanks fighting so that Ukrainian operations do not have to pause. On the plus side, Russia is running out of "modern" tanks and increasingly the Ukrainians are able to own the night and conduct
round the clock operations. Since the Russians are back footed, keep on the gas. My attitudes change post war. Russia has wrecked Ukraine and the Ukrainian Army as it exists now is going to be unaffordable and Ukraine would see a better return on scarce defense dollars by
transitioning from a conscript "levee en mass" army to a professional corps of armored Spartans in either leopard 2's or Abrams. The rebuilding process will also allow the needed upgrades to the transport infrastructure needed to make sure there are always enough ways to get from
here to there. So there you have it, raver's views on Ukraine's tank needs. Rather than devoting time, space and money to getting big cats loosed on the Ukrainian steppes we should keep on keeping on. @POTUS just announced even more #HIMARS for Ukraine something I am sure my
elected leaders @JohnBoozman, @SenTomCotton, and @RepFrenchHill support as much as I do. I am thankful they are supportive, too many so called "conservatives" are suddenly coming online to decry aid to Ukraine. I don't think its Russian directed, but i do think its political. We
are in the closing stretch of election season here and people are trying to score political points. I will say this as a conservative, no conservative that opposes aid to Ukraine will ever get my vote or donations. Politics stop when opposing the #GenocideOfUkrainians full stop.
The Russian trolls and usual suspects are also very active, a pretty typical refrain: we must appease Putin or he will glass us". No, we must oppose Putin or he will glass us. We are only in this situation becuase we did not say no in Georgia, Transnistria, ammo explosions in the
Czech Republic and Bulgaria, WMD assassinations on NATO soil, election meddling and elite capture efforts... We enabled Putin to the point he thought we always would and now here we are. Anymore appeasement or blind eyes really does risk Armageddon. So if you see them online
peddling Putin's crap, bonk them. Even better of you do so as a #FELLA and member of #NAFO becuase then they get bonked and the @georgian_legion gets more fun to super bonk actual Russians and turn them into sunflower food. Oh speaking of those sneaky guys from #Georgia... They
#rickrolled me lol. I was not expecting that. Another and critical way to bonk vatniks is too be informed in the first place. My go to is the @MriyaReport a space dedicated to 24/7/365 coverage of and discussion of all things touching on the war in Ukraine and to supporting
fundraising for @MriyaAid a very worthwhile charity. Until Ukraine wins on Ukraine's terms: Slava Ukraini! PS I know my views won't go over well with the Leopards now crowd. I welcome the debate the goal is fewer Ukrainian lives lost and more lands liberated after all.
So last night @POTUS
revealed what those of us who have been paying attention already knew. The world is closer to #Armageddon than at any time since the Cuban Missile Crisis. cbsnews.com/news/biden-arm…
why did he say it, was it just an old man's flub to be walked back like the Taiwan comments (could it be walked back), or was it deliberate and if so, who was the audience. I think some context is needed.
First, Russia has been making nuclear threats for months and has already engaged in nuclear terrorism at least 2 nuclear sites in #Ukraine: Zaporizhya and Chernobyl and recently his puppets have begun openly discussing the use of strategic nuclear weapons in response to
Do people have the right to secede from the nation they belong too without there being some extreme factors in play like say a genocide? After all East Timor, Eritrea and Kosovo recently separated (among others). Who should get a vote in such referendums?
Another example is the Scottish referendum held just before Brexit. How often do separatist minded desires get a vote? One and done, generationally, yearly? Then there was the dissolution of the USSR and a US court case from the immediate post civil war era where secession
required the will of all the citizens of the state to be split to enact such a split. I am sure there are other examples as well but I am going to dig into the cases listed above to explore the idea of secession.
Lets talk tanks Part 1. West vs East. The T90m is the ultimate evolution of the lessons of WWII that lead to the development of the T-44. When the T-44 got the 100mm gun it was renamed T-54 that lead to the T-62 but the Khrushchev said the Red Army's manning costs were too high
so the T-64 was created. It originally had the same 115mm gun. But then material costs were too high so we got the T-72... Then Iraq and the T-72 was rebranded the T-90. All evolutions of a tank prototyped in 1943. This design lineage has always stressed good frontal protection
low profile and a big gun. It was successful in many ways. At the end of WWII the USSR had a massive fleet of heavy tanks that could smash just about anything they could see. Yet with the introduction of the T-54 they began to be replaced and moved to reserve units because the
Look, I get why @elonmusk stepped in it and why he decided to follow @Pontifex onto the road to appeasement. We live in scary times and human nature is to find some place to hole up when danger looms, physically, mentally, spiritually we look for a way to escape the Angel of
Death's gimlet eye. I've got kids and grandkids too so I get the fear of nuclear war. Reports like this
raises all sorts of hairs on the back of my neck. I don't know if the photo was a real, "hey looky here" indicating #Putin is serious about #nuclear
release or more, "I said hey looky here" suggesting a staged propaganda bit. Unlike some I don't think Russia's nuclear forces are anywhere near the level of corruption and shit sandwich of the regular army. I think they are probably tip top like their space program. They get
Now the focus swings back to Kherson as the one two, three punch combos by Ukraine keep landing on soft parts in the Russian line. For those asking how does this keep happenings (mainly tankies and vatniks) here is a quick lesson on probable reasons. First the Russian Army isn't
big enough to do everything it wanted to do back in Feb. Early war losses in men and equipment meant even with the "goodwill gestures" around Kyiv what was left was still not big enough to do everything it still wanted to do. Especially since so much was tied down trying to
dig the Azovstal defenders out of their fortress. Big plans need with small armies require small enemies, focus, speed, violence of action and competence. Russia had none of these so each set back left them weaker. Each setback and repulsed shot left them less able to make
Lyman is liberated, and many of the Russian's there are no longer combatants as they are now dead, wounded or captured. This loss is going to add even more pressure to the Russian need to get bodies to the front. It seems unlikely that fear of bad reports and the constant
drumbeat of send more men now and endemic corruption will permit Russia to actually train the mobilized soldiers. The troops answering the call (vs the men fleeing to foreign shores) are basically going to be untrained militia fighters. Losses are going to skyrocket. We may be
about to enter/ have entered a feed back loop. Where Russian mothers who have lost sons, and other mothers who have sent their sons into exile become too big of a political problem to ignore. Putin has already had to address the screw ups, but now the Czar will be shown to have