Indicators haven’t been good for a long time - sadly and the recent news is the culmination of a business that consistently hasn’t been profitable. 2/
They have faced the same challenge of other MOOC platforms in moving from an enterprise initially focussed on free open courses into something that could be financial sustainable and profitable. 3/
As MOOC platforms sought to pivot to create viable businesses they were reliant on their university partners to work with them in a way that best supported that aim. 4/
That meant universities developing credit-bearing courses for larger fees like microcredentials and degrees. 5/
It meant universities focussing on developing courses in areas where there was significant demand to study online - which just like the online PGT space was healthcare, business, digital and teaching. 6/
In addition, it required universities to keep their MOOCs open to take at any time and on-demand - so that what you have is a long tail of courses that cumulatively you might get some meaningful income from via upgrades. 7/
At points there were a really large number of university courses that were not available for learners to take and learners often had no idea when it would next be available for them to take - not great for an online course marketplace! 8/
It highlights a fundamental incompatibility here with a company that needs its partners to deliver something that ultimately makes the business viable and their ability and desire to so. 9/
There’s also an incompatibility and misalignment between university partnerships that were in large part not setup in a strategic, well-thought out way with any kind of commercial ambitions 10/
I know for a fact many universities have spent thousands of pounds on these partnerships over the years that they haven’t taken that seriously and they have not recouped anywhere close to that investment. 11/
If there was a deliberateness around offering free courses to increase access then this is fair enough but for many that wasn’t the case - so it’s entirely valid to say the OU is by no means the only UK university to not achieve any kind of ROI. 12/
Another factor is they haven’t matched competitors like Coursera who are miles ahead of them and only have partnerships with a select bunch of UK universities who are some of the most serious and equipped in online education. 13/
Coursera have grown, edX have evolved through 2U acquiring and now are a shopfront for 2Us whole suite and portfolio but FutureLearn have not grown and developed quickly enough. 14/
There will be plenty of schadenfreude amongst some in the UK, particularly the small clique of digital education researchers and centres that seem to cheerlead the downfall of any and every private sector education initiative. 15/
But if this is to be the end - it’s worth us remembering that there are lots of positives that have come out of UK universities work with FutureLearn and FutureLearn’s work, as well as reflect on lessons that can and should be learnt. 16/
As I said in this post we need a bit of reset on online education but we also need to acknowledge the unique factors that are contributing to current challenges that are outside the control of online education companies - neilmosley.com/blog/what-does… 17/
Notable news in the world of online education in higher ed - Open University has announced its intention to find a buyer for its 50% stake in FutureLearn #onlinelearning#edtech#highered 1/
The other 50% is owned by SEEK - it will be interesting to observe whether a new investor will be forthcoming and whether in the short to medium term whether this will represent an upturn or a further downturn in fortunes. 2/
I wrote a thread earlier in the year about FutureLearn -
A few weeks back I wrote about MOOC platforms and about their potential future relationship with UK universities. It felt like an opportune time to do so 10 years on from the huge MOOC buzz of 2012. 1/
I spent some time looking at three of major MOOC platforms Coursera, edX and FutureLearn, because it’s hard to divorce the MOOC as an educational model from the platforms that have sprung up around them. 2/
Interesting release from 2U on current financial performance but also interestingly on future direction which appears to be coalescing under the edX brand and further developing that as marketplace platform. Job losses also look likely #onlinelearninginvestor.2u.com/news-and-event…
More on 2Us future direction - the new revenue share model is broken down with a minimum 35% that increases depending on taking marketing, support and content development services - with all these it rises to 60%. Fairly transparent proposition... 2u.com/latest/2u-unve…
Would be very interested to see what marketing actually looks like in the core bundle and how much that is really banking on the edX brand and as an existing marketplace destination.
Learning design is about designing and creating the best conditions for learning to result. It’s the design of experiences and those experiences come in different shapes and sizes. 1/
It’s about designing for people - which means it’s complex. I love this quote from Dieter Rams that speaks to this - “You cannot understand good design if you do not understand people; design is made for people”. 2/
The learning design process can range in its breadth and depth and we often think of it way too narrowly - you write some learning outcomes, design an assessment, create content & activities and then boom, you're done... 3/
Interesting report...some comments if I may as someone who has and continues to work in this space within universities, education more generally and with private edtech...1/
One of the actors that fails to get any kind of scrutiny is universities themselves who have complete autonomy as to the decisions they make about edtech. The silence on this and the general narrative portrays them as passive, obsequious actors with no choice...2/
There’s also a kind of historical naivety that makes the pandemic year zero for this stuff and there’s not enough time spent exploring the ‘why’ from a historical context. This isn’t simply about scope but about the narrative presented...3/
If you’re a university or education provider then one of the key aspects of digital transformation is thinking about the role of an educator/academic in this changed state. For universities an academic is expected to be a good educator, good researcher...1/
...keep up to date in their field and have numerous other responsibilities..oh and now be much more of a learning experience designer, a producer of videos and other media, a designer of a platform experience and it’s navigation, structure and other components of the UI...2/
Of course there’s some support for this but it’s not at a ratio that makes a huge difference and it’s light or non-existent in many areas. Can an academic wear all those hats? Should they? Will that result in the best experience for academics & students?...3/