Long read by Li Chaomin (李超民) assessing the content and impact of the US Chip Act.
Li is the deputy director of the Institute of Public Policy and Governance at Shanghai University of Finance and Economics.
Below are some of his policy recommendations for #China 🇨🇳:
1/10
"It is necessary to fully mobilise both international and domestic resources to strategically hedge against the impact of the #Biden administration's chip act. Support for and preferential policies targeting investors and tech-related talents are key." 2/10
"[We should] focus on the construction of a national governance mechanism. Priority should be given to increasing government investment and support. [We should] not only directly subsidise chip manufacturing and equipment manufacturers, but also ...
3/10
but also invest in provincial and more localised chip funds through the establishment of a central government mother fund, which will be key to boosting public and private investment and eliminating the risk of central funds investing in unrelated projects." 4/10
"[We should] focus on stimulating the construction of [favourable] policies and mechanisms for #semiconductor companies, major investors and managers … [including] increasing tax relief measures." 5/10
"[We should] focus on the strategy of strengthening the country with [new] talents. In view of the current exodus of Chinese scientists from US research institutes, we should ...
6/10
actively formulate measures to welcome more Chinese scientists back home, explore policies on residency rights and the granting of [Chinese] citizenship, and do a good job in providing [extra] security in this regard." 7/10
"We should both block the US strategy of luring semiconductor companies [already] in China to return to the US and encourage the expansion of the operating capacity of South Korean and Taiwanese semiconductor companies on the mainland." 8/10
"[We should] promote active collaboration with South Korea and other relevant Southeast Asian countries in order to plan and build autonomous and controllable alternative supply chains." 9/10
"Currently, it is particularly important to focus on converting China’s diplomatic and military advantages into active support measures for the development of [China’s] chip industry."
Another damning assessment of Liz Truss, this time by Sun Haichao (孙海潮), director of the European Centre at the China Foundation for International Studies. (1/5)
"Truss is a diplomatic hawk, with both a Margaret Thatcher-like approach to free trade and an ultra-conservative 'Britain First' bias, as well as a deeply rooted Cold War mindset" (2/5)
On Truss's mini-budget:
"The UK is supposed to be a responsible country with a strict budgetary policy. It is regrettable that the new government's 'mini-budget' has no clear idea of 🇬🇧's economic prospects and no serious assessment of the impact of its oversized public deficit"
> Comments: “Zelenski likes to carry out terrorist attacks, so here comes the revenge!” (358 likes); “To the immense satisfaction of the people. Support Putin's total annihilation of the Nazis” (319 likes)
> Top 10 Baidu
Gao Jian (高健) on Liz Truss, British foreign policy and the future of 🇨🇳-🇬🇧 relations:
1/7
"Truss has no deep political roots and thus will largely be swayed by the mainstream forces within the Conservative Party … the basic power structure of ‘strong parliament weak government’ will be the main feature of British politics for a certain period of time.” 2/7
“British foreign policy has fundamentally departed from its ‘Global Britain’ diplomatic strategy … At present, the ‘ideologisation’ and ‘Anglo-Saxonisation’ of British diplomacy is becoming increasingly apparent … The UK-US special relationship will be strengthened.” 3/7
1. #Putin: Crimea bridge bombing was a “terrorist attack” planned by Ukraine
> Top netizen comment: “Ukraine is a sovereign country” (986 likes). Other comments include fear of nuclear war and the US being behind the bombing.
> Top 10 Baidu and Toutiao
2. Explosions in central #Kyiv, 🇷🇺retaliation begins
> Netizen comment: “Is it not possible that the mysterious US forces first bombed the bridge, and now the US capital. Forcing both of them towards nuclear war” (423 likes)
> Top 10 Weibo, Baidu, Sogou
Very little expert commentary in #China on the outcome of the Italian elections.
The following is a selection of quotes:
1/17
Zhao Junjie, Institute of European Studies, CASS:
“[The right-wing populist parties] may still revise their policy statements once they are in power. That is because most Europeans do not want them to be too radical or to make society more unstable than it already is”
Zhao Junjie: “The political winds are expected to shift further towards right-wing populism in Europe over the next few years”