Judicial first class magistrate VIII Ernakulam hearing the application for police custody of the 3 accused, Muhammed Shafi aka Rashid, Bhagawal Singh and Laila Bhagawal Singh
Adv Aloor : strongly object to the application filed by prosecution. After arrest, accused were in custody for 2 days, Shafi for 3 days.
Inv for 24 hours has been completed
Aloor : materials have been collected as per mahzar. Details of first and second incidents have been disclosed. But it is not admissible as IO didnnot attempt to record 164 statement before magistrate
Aloor : when the court granted judicial custody, did the prosecution reserve it's right to apply for police custody? If there is an order of judicial custody, they should move to appellate court as per Sanjay dutt v State of Maharashtra.
Aloor : what further investigation is required now with the accused? Without their custody also investigation can be carried out now since necessary materials have been collected
Aloor : according to me, it is not an investigation. Please peruse 106 of evidence act which says whatever info is revealed by accused should not be investigated
Aloor : now, 3 days custodial interrogation has happened. I have been threatened, threatened to confess also. This is another method of enticing me to become an approver.
Aloor : they are seeking 12 days custody to compel the accused to say that it is not just human sacrifice but also that the accused cannibalised the victims
Aloor : the police says they want to know if more victims were there. Why should I be compelled ? They can investigate the complaints of missing women that they have
Aloor : the accused should have said they have no legal counsel and then only legal services authority should have been contacted by police. This process was not followed
Aloor : confession statement and other material are discussed in media. General public may not know that confession given under 161 CrPC is not admissible as evidence
Public prosecutor: the accused were presented before magistrate within 24 hours. The offence also includes abduction. Kadavanthra police has ample custody in this matter
Magistrate: he is saying that you want 13 days only to compel the accused to admit to cannibalism etc
PP : no my lord. Learned defense counsel is referring to Arnesh Kumar which is applicable to offences under 7 years punishment
PP : this first accused is a 6th standard pass. How did he use social media so well to arrange all this? He may have some assistance and we need to find out
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal appears for WhatsApp, ASG N Venkatraman for CCI.
Sibal: if a Constitutional court finds that my policy is okay and consistent with the law, this cannot go on. PDP bill is coming, SG told Constitution Bench to hear privacy policy matter in January.
A Varanasi Court today will pronounce its order on a plea filed by the 4 Hindu worshippers seeking directions to the Archaeological Survey of India to conduct 'scientific investigation' of Shiva Linga reportedly found in #GyanvapiMosque premises
Follow this thread for updates:
District Judge AK Vishvesha had reserved the order on October 11, after hearing the submissions filed by the Mosque Committee objecting to the plea moved by Hindi Worshippers' for 'scientific investigation' of the alleged Shiva Linga found during survey of #Gyanvapimosque
On October 7, the Court had sought clarification on certain questions, which are:
1) Whether Shiva Linga (reported to be found) inside #Gyanvapimosque premises is part of suit property or not?
2) Does court have power to direct 'scientific investigation' of alleged structure?
Chief Justice of India Uday Umesh Lalit sitting with Justice Hemant Gupta today. It is Justice Gupta's last day in court today.
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: On behalf of the bar we wish Justice Gupta a very happy and successful second inning which will be in Delhi and Chandigarh. I wish lordship keeps coming to court and we have coffee
CJI UU Lalit: we are two senior most judges in this combination in terms of age. I will be in the same situation shortly.. parting is inevitable but it all depends on how you play when at it. I have known #JusticeHemantGupta since last 13 years and played a straight inning
#SupremeCourt hears a plea seeking a pre screening committee for web series
CJI UU Lalit: This court has been consistent that there is no pre-censorship. You have to say that the existing regime has censor certificate for cinema etc and whether it applies to OTT or not
CJI: For OTT Satellite transmission is from other countries and not this one even though viewers may be here. Post exhibition redressal mechanism is different. What is being said in this plea that what is being shown in OTT or over sattelite should also be under this scheme
Adv: Now the Mirzapur series is coming again
CJI: It was already broadcasted in October 2020
Adv: They are again coming with Mirzapur showing a city which is adulterous
#SupremeCourt to shortly deliver judgement on petitions challenging the Karnataka High Court verdict dismissing a batch of petitions filed by Muslim girls studying in pre-university colleges seeking right to wear hijab in classrooms
Karnataka HC had upheld an order of the State government which suggested that wearing #hijab can be restricted in government colleges where uniforms are prescribed, and ruled that such curbs under norms for college uniforms are “constitutionally permissible”.
Read who argued what before Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia: #SupremeCourt#Hijab