LawBeat Profile picture
Oct 18 15 tweets 7 min read
🚨 #DelhiHighCourt to pronounce it's Judgment today on Umar Khalid's challenge to a Delhi court's order which found his role in the Delhi Riots conspiracy “apparent”, rejecting his bail plea.

Khalid is accused of larger conspiracy cases concerning #DelhiRiots of 2020. Image
A bench of Justice Siddharth Mridul and Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar to pronounce the judgment soon.
BREAKING: #DelhiHighCourt DENIES bail to Umar Khalid accused under #UAPA in relation to the 2020 #DelhiRiots.

The High Court has dismissed Khalid's challenge to lower court's order which had found Khalid's role in the #DelhiRiots conspiracy.
#UmarKhalid
The bench said, "We don't find any fair merit in the appeal."

#DelhiRiots
#UmarKhalid
[Delhi Riots] Delhi High Court Denies Bail To UAPA Accused Umar Khalid; Dismisses Appeal
@Gautam_Adv28 reports
lawbeat.in/top-stories/de…
Delhi High Court says it is "IN FULL AGREEMENT" with the order passed by the sessions judge which found the role of Umar Khalid in delhi riots larger conspiracy "apparent" and rejected his bail #delhiriots #UmarKhalid
Cannot be said nothing incriminating against Umar Khalid, a collective reading that unfolded on each day after 04.12.2019 (passing of CAA by Central cabinet) cannot be shrugged aside: Delhi High Court rejects UAPA accused #UmarKhalid's bail #delhiriots
Statements confirm conspiratorial meeting took place in at Seelampur between Umar Khalid with Pinjra Tod members, ors, wherein it was decided to induce local women to start stock piling knives, bottles, acids, stones, chilly-powder for rioting: Delhi HC rejects Umar Khalid's bail
Delhi High Court rejects contention that statements of protected witnesses are of questionable credibility and unreliable as plan was to escalate Jaffrabad protest site to the next level of Chakka Jam and then riots, rejects #UmarKhalid's bail
Delhi HC says witnesses statements duly support meeting of #UmarKhalid with Jahangirpuri residents where he stated that "Bangladeshis live here & must be asked to fight against the said law"; HC rejects contention of Khalid's lawyer that they shouldn't be taken into consideration
Court cannot turn its blind eye to other incriminating material against Umar Khalid in this case, clandestinely delivered speeches at Amravati & Maharashtra despite non-grant of permission by authorities, CCTV footages & flurry of calls after riots merit consideration: Delhi HC
Delhi HC says it is not impressed by argument that "call to revolution" such as “Inquilabli Salam” (Revolutionary Salute) and “Krantikari Istiqbal” (Revolutionary Welcome) used during speech was for immediate gathering as "Revolution not necessarily bloodless" #UmarKhalid Image
Appears to be PRE-MEDITATED conspiracy for causing disruptive chakka-jam & pre-planned protests at different planned sites, engineered to escalate to confrontational chakka-jam & incitement to violence & culminate in riots in natural course: Delhi HC rejects #UmarKhalid's bail
Weapons used, manner of attack, resultant deaths destruction caused indicates it was pre-planned, name of Umar Khalid finds RECURRING mention from beginning of conspiracy to culmination of ensuing riots: Delhi HC rejects #UmarKhalid's bail Image
Allegations 'Prima Facie True': Delhi High Court Dismisses UAPA Accused Umar Khalid's Bail Plea [Read Order]
@Gautam_Adv28 reports
lawbeat.in/amp/top-storie…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

Oct 19
Just In: An application has been filed in the #SupremeCourt against #DelhiGovernment seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against them owing to the #Ban on online sale of the #firecrackers allegedly imposed by them.
@dr_a_p_singhLaw
Adv AP Singh while speeking with @LawBeatInd said, not only online sale, general sale & use of #firecracker has also been banned.

Application stated, CM @ArvindKejriwal, without passing any official resolution announced a ban on the sale and distribution of firecrackers in Delhi
It submits that the prohibition imposed on the purchase and sale of #firecrackers and not licensing firecracker shops in Delhi is not only an attack on our "Religious Tradition of bursting crackers on #Deepawali but also in violation of the Explosives Rules 2008."
Read 4 tweets
Oct 19
#SupremeCourt in an SLP challenging common judgment and order of conviction of Madras HC for the offences u/s 341, 323, 376 of IPC and u/s 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act, states:
‘Oral testimony by victim, supported by husband and mother in law needs no further corroboration’
Court noted that the testimonies stood the test of cross-examination and were very consistent versions.
The appellant had challenged the conviction on the grounds:
-that all the accused were not named in FIR
-only description of height was given
-that there were no injuries on the victim
Read 4 tweets
Oct 19
Bench : Are you appearing in person?

#bombayhighcourt
Bench - You have to get permission from the registrar for appearing in person
Read 6 tweets
Oct 19
PIL states that during the lockdown and Corona period, when the entire print media in India was facing heavy losses, the company ‘Prabodhan Prakashan Pvt. Ltd.’, owned by Thackeray family, showed Turnover of 42 Crores and profit of Rs.11.5 Crores.
The petitioner has stated that "It seems it’s a clear case of turning the black money into white one."
The petition alleges that the PIL is filed for the purpose of exposing the huge money laundering and indiscriminate corruption played by the persons holding very high places as public servants.
Read 5 tweets
Oct 19
#SupremeCourt hearing a plea challenging Death Sentence of a man accused of rape and murder of a 4 year old girl.
Modification of order is sought for in the plea. Image
Court notes:
-Offence was committed in April 2013 -in February 2013 there was an amendment to IPC.
-POCSO comes in effect only in 2019.
-Section 376 IPC requires ‘till last breath’
Counsel requests Imprisonment to life. Conviction under I and M was affirmed by the Court earlier.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 19
#Delhi's Special CBI Court, Rouse Avenue will today continue hearing @AamAadmiParty Minister #SatyendraJain bail plea in #moneylaunderingcase.
Yesterday, Adv. Sushil Gupta for Ankush Jain &Vaibhav Jain began making his arguments before Spl. Judge Vikas Dhull.
#PMLA #Bail #plea
During the Hearing, Yesterday, SPP N. K. Matta, filed an additional affidavit on behalf of #ED showing conduct of the three accused namely, #Satyendra Jain, Ankush Jain, and Vaibhav Jain the Jail.
SPP Matta alleged that 3 accused are hampering investigation &that Ankush and Vaibhav are helping Jain. He also contended that Jain is controlling everything from inside.

Read more:
lawbeat.in/news-updates/p…
Read 35 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(