1/9 with @samhusseini we did a #deepdive investigation into the origin of the #Ebola2014 outbreak in W. Africa. The text is long. It follows up #Lableak Qs originally raised by @africanistpress and others. Below are distilled some of the key points.
independentsciencenews.org/health/did-wes…
2) The orthodox origin story has negligible evidence to support it. No #Ebola was found at Meliandou, Guinea, or elsewhere in wild animals nor was it diagnosed or positively tested in 'patient zero' or his contacts. The nearest known wild source was a whopping 3,000 km away
3) The subsequent epidemiological investigation back from the first confirmed cases was also highly speculative. E.g. the father and others disagree that his family had #Ebola, even tho' the epidemiology was supposedly largely based on interviews. #Ebola2014
4) However, there is a lab not far from Meliandou, over the border in Sierra Leone. It isnt clear if the US-funded Viral Hemorrhagic Fever lab in Kenema studied #Ebola there but certainly @metabiota, who worked there, was also collecting viruses from Central Africa #Ebola2014.
5) Moreover, numerous contemporaneous on the ground accounts alleged very lax biosafety procedures at the VHFC Kenema lab both before and after the outbreak of #Ebola2014 and the VHFC credibly alleged that, amazingly, @metabiota was culturing #Ebola virus.
6)Phylogenetics does not support an outbreak in Guinea, if anything it favours Sierra Leone a) because a Guinea origin generates anomalies and b) because it clearly shows there was an undiagnosed early outbreak in Sierra Leone that predated official first appearance of #Ebola2014
7) An undiagnosed outbreak beginning much earlier than officially acknowledged in Sierra Leone concords with the assessments made at the time by no less than @WHO AND @MSF AND @CDCgov who were there at the time.
8) Such inconsistencies and anomalies were known to but ignored by the researchers who confidently stated a Guinean origin. Why did they ignore the pointers to Sierra Leone? Maybe they just simply feared African voices, like @africanistpress who pointed at the VHFC lab?
9) A big one: Many of the key players, like Eddie Holmes, Kristian Andersen, Andrew Rambaut, Bob Garry, overlap with those opposing a #lableak by #COVID19 as do their scientific and phylogenetic suppression methods and techniques. So maybe they really knew more?
Hence the implications of a #Ebola2014 lab leak are impt in their own right but also to understanding #COVID19 and #OriginOfCovid and even further to preventing future outbreaks. When epidemiologists blame an outbreak on the wildlife trade, be sceptical. To be continued...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bioscience Resource Project

Bioscience Resource Project Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BioSRP

Oct 26
1/8 Super impt. findings of our investigation into the suppressed origin #Ebola2014 are the strong parallels between research on that outbreak and how #OriginofCOVID researchers manipulated #science to suppress #Covidorigin #lableak theories. See below
independentsciencenews.org/health/did-wes…
2) Just like the #OriginofCovid, the science of the outbreak was driven by conflicted researchers closely connected to the suspect lab #Ebola2014
3) Just like Covid, a barely credible origin narrative was presented as an established fact and propagated in the global media #Ebola2014
Read 8 tweets
Jul 26, 2020
Wanted to try a twitter tutorial (our first, so bear with it) on the v. interesting #CRISPR issues raised by the recent birth of #geneedited #Calf "Cosmo", thx to @UCDavis researcher @BioBeef. Author @MeganMolteni gamely brought in some perspective but no technical critic, so....
The following are issues neglected or barely raised in the text but should be born in mind while reading the article, which described attempts to add the SRY sex "determining" gene and make all male animals: wired.com/story/a-crispr…
2 The researchers began w/a "crude portrait" #genome sequence (so the first embryos died because the researchers chose the wrong place to edit). The premise of #geneediting is precision but this requires EXACT knowledge of the target genome, which almost invariably is lacking.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(