SG: Total are 232 petitions. There are 53 matters. 50 for assam and 3 for tripura. Centre has filed the reply and we need some time to file reply on behalf of Assam and Tripura.
CJI: This prayer was made on last occasion as well #CAA
SG:I understand the sensitivity of the case.
CJI: That is why we said to frame questions etc
SG: 1 is an umbrella category where parliament has concerned itself with one set of people, the second issue is connected to Assam and Tripura. Not possible to classify in categories
Dr AM Singhvi: please designate one matter as lead matter. please fix deadline for the replies. there are constitutional issues involved and replies have to be time bound. 200 or 75 matters do not matter #CAA
Dr Singhvi: we all want it off the board otherwise there will be arguments on segregation etc.
Sr Adv PA Wilson: we also have to look at Sri Lankan Tamils and there is no reply on this by the SG. Reply is only a common counter for Assam and Tripura #CAA
SG: For Assam and Tripura we are still getting petitions.
CJI: Which are the lead matters one can designate..
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: pleadings in my matter is complete
CJI: Either we undertake the exercise. or leave it for the subsequent bench. there are certain nuances which will get projected in another case apart from lead case
Sr Adv Siddharth Luthra: once IUML becomes the lead matter, the ancillary issues will fall in place
Sr Adv Sibal: that is my case yes
CJI: Who is the AoR?
Sibal: Adv Pallavi Pratap
CJI: We will nominate her as nodal counsel. Adv Kanu Agarwal for the respondents
CJI: right at outset SG Mehta has submitted that he may be given some additional time to comply with directions issues of this court and submits that replies by Assam and Tripura are not yet filed and short time may be granted for the same #caa
CJI: Having noted that there are various pleas projecting multiple views, resolution of entire controversy can be achieved if 2 or 3 matters are taken as lead matters and convenience compilations of all counsels are prepared well in advance. this will make proceedings convenient
CJI: Pleadings in IUML is complete and was filed by Adv Pallavi Pratap. We appoint Ms Pratap and Mr Kanu Agarwal as nodal counsels. These counsels are requested to have common compilation of all relevant documents #CAA
CJI: Let the nodal counsel share the compilation with all lawyers in digital format and all counsels to share written submissions not exceeding three pages. Nodal counsel can designate 1 or 2 other matters as lead matters keeping in mind geographical/religious classification #caa
CJI: Assam and Tripura to file their reply in 2 weeks. Nodal counsels to file compilation in the next three weeks.
The #MadrasHighCourt is hearing the bunch of 50 pleas filed by the #RSS seeking permission for a state-wide route march in Tamil Nadu on November 6.
Senior counsel NL Rajah for RSS- Permission has been granted by the TN police for the march in only 3 out of the 50 districts we requested. This is in contempt of the court's order.
Senior counsel NR Elango for TN police- In 24 of the 50 locations, the commissioners of police felt it was not possible to grant permission. At 23 locations the SPs said the march can be allowed but only in a closed space or indoors.
Supreme Court is hearing a PIL by BJP leader Ashwini Upadhyay seeking a direction to Centre, states and union territories to set up expert committees to suggest steps for improving India’s “pathetic” ranking on the global Corruption Perception Index #SupremeCourt
Adv Upadhyay: today is my last appearance before your lordships
CJI: No, i have still a few more days left
Justice Ravindra Bhat: How many reported judgments do you have in your name?
Upadhyay: i did not count milord. I left my PSU career to pursue this profession
Upadhyay @AshwiniUpadhyay : Please see the examples. one person for corporate fraud was sentenced to 1 lakh plus years and for ponzi scheme one was sentenced for 13,000 years.
Kerala High Court is set to pronounce verdict on Kozhikode Sessions judge S Krishnakumar's plea against his transfer to a labour court.
The judge had come under the scanner for his controversial "provocative dress" order.
The HC registrar had opposed the plea stating that the transfer was effected in the general interest of administration of justice and that the judge had made unwarranted comments and used inappropriate methods while handling some cases
Kerala High Court SETS ASIDE the transfer of Kozhikode Sessions judge S Krishnakumar to a labour court following his controversial "provocative" dress order