#ufohistory#ufotwitter#condon
Today In UFO History - The Condon Report
October 31, 1968
1/The Colorado project delivers its report, Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects, to the Air Force. The first two sections, conclusions and recommendations, are written by Condon
2/himself. He concludes that “further extensive study of UFOs probably cannot be justified in the expectation that science will be advanced thereby.” It is a clear signal to shut down Project Blue Book. Yet 30% of its cases are unexplained. Condon says a UFO cover-up is
3/unthinkable because no one could keep such a secret for so long. He refutes the claim that the CIA has installed an agent within the project. He disapproves of UFO “amateurists,” especially NICAP. The project ignored old cases because they only offered witness testimony, are
4/probably misidentifications, and it
makes little sense to reinterview witnesses. But this means ignoring the most compelling cases of the past 20+ years. Condon rejects the ETH because it is so unlikely that aliens can get here from there. This attitude suggests that Condon’s
5/approach is fundamentally antiempirical. The report also includes summaries of field studies, photographic evidence, direct and indirect physical evidence, optical and radar cases, and astronaut sightings. In the field studies section, Roy Craig concedes that some of the older
6/cases suggest something extraordinary (Great Falls, RB-47). William K. Hartmann divides photo cases into fabrications, misidentifications, poor image quality, and clear images that lack sufficient data. Great Falls and McMinnville are the only two that he considers unusual.
7/Gordon Thayer discusses the predominance of anomalous propagation in radar cases. In finding natural explanations, Thayer often disregards witness testimony. The rest of the report is mostly padding.[George Eberhart]
Sources:
Mike Swords Files [leading expert on Colorado project];
Michael D. Swords, “The University of Colorado UFO Project: The ‘Scientific Study of UFOs,’” JUFOS 6 (1995/96): 149–184;
Swords, Et al , UFOs and Government, pg.329–332;
Sources cont.:
Willy Smith, “A REFERENCE GUIDE FOR THE CONDON REPORT”, JUFOS 6 (1995/96): 185–194;
Steven J. Dick, "Life on other worlds : the 20th-century extraterrestrial life debate" , pg.152-159;
Wikipedia, "Condon Committee" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condon_Co…
The CONDON Report at Project1947 (Prepared by National Capital Area Skeptics (NCAS) )
Swords, Michael D. “The USAF-Sponsored Colorado Project for the Scientific Study of UFOs.” In MUFON 1995 International UFO Symposium Proceedings. archive.ph/20130113190424…
The University of Colorado UFO Project and
The Demise of Project Blue Book
by Michael Swords, Ph.D.
#ufotwitter#ufohistory#ce3#ufo#ufolanding
Today In History - Cennina CE3 Landing Case
November 1, 1954 - Cennina, Italy
1/6:30 a.m. Rosa Lotti Dainelli sets out for the church at the castle of Cennina, Arezzo, Italy. As she passes through a wooded area, she sees a
2/spindle-shaped object standing upright next to a cypress tree. It has two portholes and a little door, through which she can see two chairs. Two little men come out from behind the object; they are dressed in gray suits, cloaks that come down to their waists, and red helmets.
3/They speak in an unintelligible language and snatch flowers from her hands and throw them inside the UFO. Dainelli flees, glancing back only once. [Eberhart]
Sources:
Cover of "La Domenica del Corriere" November 14, 1954;
Article in the weekly "Tutti" of November 14, 1954;
#ufotwitter#ufohistory#UFO
Today In UFO History - Colorado Project Officially Starts
November 1, 1966
1/The University of Colorado UFO project officially launches. Michael D. Swords writes:
2/“It was one of the most peculiar scientific grants of all time. Normally a governmental grant goes to a scientist who has initiated it or is at least vitally interested and experienced in the field, and essentially knows exactly what he is going to do. This grant was to a
3/scientist who was pushed into it, had little interest and apparently no experience, and, despite his brilliance, ‘didn’t have a clue.’ Because the reports of the UFO phenomenon are so complex and multidimensional, this short-term ‘backwards grant’ was doomed to fail before it
November 2, 1972 - Vogel Report
The Vogel Study of the Yakima/Toppenish lights was undertaking at the request of J Allen Hynek (who investigated them as well) by David Akers, WJ Vogel. Greg Long also studied them, and Earthlights in general. #ufotwitter#ufohistory#earthlights
#ufotwitter#aviationhistory#aviation
November 1, 1978
The Air Force decides to produce an F-117A stealth fighter based on the mostly successful tests of Have Blue aircraft at Tonopah Test Range in Nevada. The contract goes to Lockheed’s Skunk Works.
#ufotwitter#ufohistory#NASA
Today In UFO History - NASA's Original Attempt to Study UFOs
October 31, 1977
1/David Williamson Jr., a NASA assistant administrator for special projects, drafts a memorandum of a proposed letter to be signed by Noel W. Hinners and sent to
2/Robert A. Frosch. The letter mentions a revival of interest in UFOs and paranormal phenomena, as well as new sightings. It mentions a lack of tangible evidence to analyze and a lack of protocols for investigating UFOs as hindrances to NASA setting up an investigatory panel:
3/“All in all, undertaking a formal study at this time appears to be fraught with peril.” Williamson sees two choices: refuse the project, or have NASA review the best cases from civilian UFO organizations and new cases. He foresees problems with workload, peer pressure, and
#ufotwitter#ufo#radiodrama
Today In History - The War of the Worlds Radio Drama
October 30, 1938 - Invasion Hoax
8:00 p.m. “The War of the Worlds” episode of the American radio drama anthology series The Mercury Theatre on the Air, [Cont.]
directed and narrated by actor and future filmmaker Orson Welles, is an adaptation of H. G. Wells’s novel The War of the Worlds (1898). It is performed and broadcast live in New York City as a Halloween episode over the Columbia Broadcasting System radio network. The episode
becomes famous for allegedly causing panic among its listening audience, though the scale of that panic is disputed as the program has relatively few listeners. In the days after the adaptation, widespread outrage is expressed in the media. The program’s news-
bulletin format is