The list of concerns I have with this article cannot be contained to one tweet but let's start with a few.
https://twitter.com/guardian/status/1592082142900518912
1) WinGate was an accredited program until only this year. It is likely the horrific assault occurred while accredited. Why this was omitted from the article but mentioning the program is currently not unaccredited is worrying.
2) The article mentions that accredited #WildernessTherapy programs achieve 424% better outcomes than "treatment as usual" [aka anything but wilderness]. The problems with this study are endless and no #therapy is 424% more effective than doing absolutely nothing.
3) @BreakingCodeSi3 is referenced in the same paragraph the lack of accreditation is indicated as part of the problem. The industry accrediting the industry has been part of the problem all along. I hope #BreakingCodeSilence write a response.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
