🧵Over the past few days there's been much speculation regarding point 23 of the #G20 Leaders Declaration & global #vaccinepassports. Our analysis:

1⃣ The use of digital/non digital solutions for another respiratory virus like 'pandemic' are *useless*.

consilium.europa.eu/media/60201/20… Image
2⃣ There's *no joint ratification or amendment* of point 23 under the existing IHR (2005).

3⃣ Again, no matter the recognition or 'success' as they call it, re: digital #COVID19 certificates, they've been as useless as a chocolate fireguard over the past two years.
4⃣ The WHO published a guide last year on tech specs & implementation of digital documentation.

This acts as *guidance & recommendation*. It cannot be mandated under the IHR, even with a targeted Annex 6 amendment.

This doesn't override the decisions of its member states. Image
5⃣ We *already have* best practices & preparedness to 'facilitate seamless intl travel', i.e. the current pandemic treaty (IHR). Leaders tore this up over the past two years.

Interoperability of digital solutions in the future will be presented with many technical hurdles.
6⃣ A global, digital interoperable cert to facilitate future intl travel with people carrying their 'special category data' on a mobile application, would face huge privacy & security concerns.

Especially when trying to make this all operable with intl health databases.
7⃣ The #G20 Leaders can wax lyrical in their statement all they want. 'Supporting' one thing & then being able to realistically adopt that, are entirely different.

8⃣ Nothing was 'signed' or 'adopted'. The WHO make recommendations & can't override domestic health policy ⤵️ Image
9⃣ The only certificate of vaccination that merits any use for intl travel is Yellow Fever, which is agreed by all WHO member nations under Annex 6 of the IHR & is *very specific* to only a handful of African & South American countries you might enter or transit through.
In summary & to be clear, we're not taking a pro WHO stance & have as many reservations about them as others do.

All we've attempted to do here is to try & straighten out & apply more rational analysis amidst the furore since the #G20 summit concluded.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with STOPCOMMONPASS ❌

STOPCOMMONPASS ❌ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @org_scp

Nov 17
We've noticed a lot of drama re-emerging with the @DCMS IDVT (Identity Verification Technology) & the use of IDSP's (Identity Service Providers) which is something that we & @TruthTalkUK covered since 2021.

Some call it 'the end of freedom', but let's revisit what it is: Image
Since April 2022, landlords, employers & DBS checks may be conducted by using a IDSP to verify British or Irish citizens ID credentials.

The 'objective' is to improve mobility & to enhance security rather than using less secure methods. This *maybe* useful for remote workers. Image
The most important thing to note - not only is the scheme *not mandatory*, but other methods of verification must be made available for onboarding such as doing so in person e.g. landlord/employer or using the relevant UK Govt gateway in the process, e.g. DBS. Image
Read 8 tweets
Nov 16
If you're not concerned about @NHSDigital using the Palantir 'Foundry' system, which will be used to process confidential patient data without your consent, then you should be.

Here's just a few examples of our concern from Palantir's Terms & Conditions, circa. 2020 ⤵️
What is the 'other data' that Palantir may collect from its Foundry software. Where is it stored & does it leave the country where processing occurs.
Will patient data leave the United Kingdom & be processed elsewhere like the #EU or 'other locations'.

Where are these 'other locations'.

Which 'third party' is involved in the 'datacentre security standards'.
Read 9 tweets
Nov 10
✈️ UPDATE: We've re-analysed 226 countries/territories with info provided by @FCDOtravelGovUK, here's what we've found:

✅ 133 countries have no #COVID19 border restrictions

❌ 15 remain as 'jab only' for entry

ℹ️ MORE INFORMATION BELOW ⤵️
All remain jab only with very little or no exemption:

🇨🇰 Cook Islands
🇬🇶 Equatorial Guinea
🇫🇯 Fiji
🇬🇭 Ghana
🇮🇷 Iran
🇱🇷 Liberia
🇲🇼 Malawi
🇲🇭 Marshall Islands
🇫🇲 Micronesia
🇳🇷 Nauru
🇵🇼 Palau
🇵🇳 Pitcairn Islands
🇹🇴 Tonga
🇹🇨 Turks & Caicos
🇺🇸 USA
❔ Unverifiable information on the following:

🇦🇫 Afghanistan
🇦🇶 Antarctica
🇰🇮 Kiribati
🇬🇸 South Georgia
🇹🇲 Turkmenistan
🇹🇻 Tuvalu
Read 7 tweets
Nov 7
On Nov 1st, the Health Sec. @SteveBarclay ordered GP's to comply with Reg.3(4) of COPI 2002 (below) to 'solely process' confidential patient data 'for a #COVID19 purpose' alongside Reg.7 of the Act.

Let's unpack the regs a bit more in this thread.

legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2002/1438… COPI Regulations 2022
A big concern surrounds those who already 'opted-out' under the National Data Opt-Out scheme.

This doesn't apply in relation to Reg. 3 of COPI where common law duty of confidentiality may be lifted for re: communicable diseases & risk to public health.

digital.nhs.uk/services/natio…
Reg. 3(1)(d)(iii) & (iv) of COPI mentions 'efficacy' & 'safety of immunisation programmes'. Also 'adverse reactions to vaccines & medicines'.

This appears to have been left out or avoided with regards to the scope of the outlined '#COVID19 purpose'

gov.uk/government/pub…
Read 8 tweets
Nov 7
We all know the #NHS COVID Pass is as useful as a chocolate teapot when it came to 'slowing the spread' of #SARSCoV2 at home & abroad.

It's now abundantly clear why the Govt won't drop this scheme as it's part of an ongoing data grab which concludes April 30th 2023.
The COVID Pass drove 'Wayfinder' (NHS app) usage to record levels in Q2/Q3 in 2021 as well as increasing #COVID19 jab uptake while intl travel slowly resumed.

Any cessation of the CP between now & April '23 would mean a large drop off of users & most importantly, their data.
All of this fits together with the timeline outlined by @maggie_erewash answer to a WPQ from @AndrewRosindell in July.

In their Statutory Board (Public) Agenda meeting on 1st Nov, the #NHS still aren't clear on *which organisations* the COVID Pass will transition to.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 6
🚨 On Tuesday we reported that @SteveBarclay gave notice to GP's under Reg. 3(4) of COPI to process confidential patient information 'for purposes of #COVID19'.

What we didn't know is that this data will be shared on a platform connected to PALANTIR.

theregister.com/2022/11/04/uk_…
The NHS claim that confidential data will be anonymised in accordance with ICO guidances & patients can't stop this process under the National Opt-Out.

But then they mention about 'pseudoanonymity' later on which is NOT anonymity.

Pseudoanonymous data can be re-identified.
If you don't know who PALANTIR are & their association with In-Q-Tel & the CIA, now's the time you did more research on that.

We sincerely hope that @openDemocracy @Foxglovelegal make further ground in seeking JR against what's happening without patient consent.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(