So today was the first day I started to delve into @summitnational the bank that #nexo announced end of Sep 2022 that it had taken an undisclosed stake in and a 'game changer for the industry'.
Does anyone remember that song "pretty fly for a white guy"
well of summit's directors is way more fly than that guy. back in 2011 said director managed to launch his #Porshe 35 feet in the air into the second story of a house.
So the next thing I found out about @summitnational isn't as cool as the flying Porshe guy. But I thought it was pretty interesting. Is that most of the current directors are not from the US.
Current board/officers include 2 #russian's and 1 from #austria. I've mapped out some of their legacy networks but its incomplete...I'll post when its in better shape.
but one thing I will say there appears to be an emerging thematic and that is - just because located in the US, called a US bank, requires regulatory approval, big, small, rural or run locally doesn't mean its owned or controlled domestically.
When looking at #moonstone I (along with everyone else) puzzled that it could be swooped by offshore interests. As it was it turned out it had been owned by offshore interest since at least 1994 back when it only had $1.6m in deposits
So no one really should be too surprised that an international group like #Nexo is buying into a local bank.
Since Nexo originated from #bulgaria and the bank they are investing into has a couple of #russian directors doesn't appear unreasonable.
especially when you dig back into the past of Summit and realise it was acquired back in 2006 by a #chinese banking group (which blew up in financial crisis)...I haven't pieced together ownership between then and now.....but I doubt it was breaking any performance records.
I'll get back to the original purpose of these tweets....
Note the date that the news first broke that #nexo had made an industry changing investment into #summit.
Everyone covered it all at once and the story was consistent and sounded pretty good "industry changer"
If you wind back a day...there was some #nexo news that got some coverage but not quite the same amplification...
To be fair it was just #fud. I mean what else could you call 8 US states filing action against a #crypto group?
and you have to feel bad for whoever was running the #PR campaign for 'industry changing announcement'. imagine having the game changer of all game changers dropping the day after being #fudded by 8 jealous regulators. Talk about bad timing.
You then have to ask the question....when did #nexo actually make the investment into @summitnational
and no I don't have a definative answer (as the filings are not as transparent as Washington in the case of #moonstone
What I can say is there are a few markers that strongly suggest that perhaps #nexo had got involved a fair bit before the end of Sep 2022.
Here's a couple of screenshots to peruse... and make your own mind up
First here's annual report filing dated 4 November 2020.
Note all the US based officers....
Here's the next year's annual report filing dated 31 December 2021 (nearly a year ago).
Note: the change in directors/officers. There's now 2 Russians and an Austrian in the mix.
Kinda alludes to a change in control.....and I'm betting that #nexo's investment was way before September 2022.....A #fudder might suggest the announcement wasn't just bad timing...more ....maybe we should disclose it before it gets disclosed by the #fudders
So there went my evening. It started off productive but then I saw that someone posted a list of DOGE emails. I noticed that only elon and one other didnt have a doge address. so looked at the eop.gov forward to whitehouse.gov I had previously thought the primary domain was wh.gov but its not.
I had previously thought the primary domain was wh.gov but its not. but I did notice a bunch of tags.
and a load of domain forwards. which reminds me of elevateelon.com for the doge.gov site. I digress..
Ive already posted a number of posts on the overlapping tags and as noted there are a bunch of reasons this could happen so Im not going to repeat them again.
@DOGE a few bits & bobs for you have a look at.
First turn off the ports on your website you are not using and fix the tag vunerability.
But then you should really look at the tracking tag for whitehouse[.]gov and see why there a few overlaps with other entities. like the Albanian government.
This could cloned/reused tags/tag injection or something else.
@DrFranzC @NortheastCash @sprintcat9 @DOGE_GSA @DOGE You idiot. The contract award amount is not paid by the gov agencies it is fully funded by a 3rd party under an ESPC with a performance guarantee by Ameresco as the ESCO, it is self funded through the savings gained through the retrofit/upgrades across the 23 buildings.
@DrFranzC @NortheastCash @sprintcat9 @DOGE_GSA @DOGE So instead of paying zero, the agency will have to continue to maintain aging and legacy equipment the older they get the more expensive O&M is.
@DrFranzC @NortheastCash @sprintcat9 @DOGE_GSA @DOGE So now the agency will have to go through the same process at some stage the agency will have to waste time and resources going through the process again making an assessment between two pathways;
- ESPC; or
- Design-bid-build
Well done DOGE. You have just cancelled a contract for the feasibility study for a ESPC (Energy Saving Performance Contract) the sole purpose of guaranteeing the costs savings to be achieved by the project to secure 3rd party financing which is repaid by the savings generated through the term of the contact.
This contract went through a multistage tender approval process. So by cancelling it you have delayed the project.
@DOGE_GSA the contract is 23 years because the service provider (who guarantees the energy costs savings) provides the O&M services....guess the money comes from....the fucking guaranted savings.
So why does it cost so much to undertake the feasibility studies. because you are shifting the risk from the gov as well as the financing. The provider needs to be absolutely certain that those savings are actually going to be available to repay the 3rd party loan that finance all the capex and has sufficient additional cashflow to fund the O&M.
mate its absolutely achievable. I've done the numbers.
There are only 2 critical success factors; 1. Bitcoin goes to $23m per coin by 2045; 2. A visionary buyer that has accumulated > $20T and has confidence that even after 20 years of 34% CAGR providing the seller with a 350x bagger, that there's sufficient upside to warrant acquiring 1m bitcoin for > $20T.
The analysis;
Current US GDP $29.33T, Debt $35.49T
Using World bank forecast GDP growth of 1.9% and assuming the debt ratio stays the same
2045 debt will be a spritely $51.71B
Just for good measure here's the GDP and debt numbers for the Top 20.
Even after the 50% debt reduction, the US will still have the largest debt of all countries.
For the purpose of the analysis I've distilled the Lummis plan down to;
Buy 1m BTC for $70B using existing cash reserves.
Exit all or part of BTC holdings by 2045 to payout half the total debt.
In estimating how much of the investment would be required to settle 50% of the debt.
Two scenarios: Pessimistic (sell down 100%) and probable (sell down 50% ).
So for months I've been asking the question.
Who is behind the unnamed "private sector" group who are being given prioritised access to delivering food and supplies into #gaza.
I am suprised that literally no one appears to be looking into who this un-named collective that has delivered 25% of all 'goods and services' into #gaza.
I say G&S and not #humanitarianaid as these are commercial arranagements. Not for the starving or needy just for those that can pay.
The previous pie chart falls well short of actually what's happening with the shift to these unknown private groups.
When you look at the data over the last 3 months. Private groups are > 50% and increasing volumes month to month while total deliveries are decreasing.
July they are at 75% of total.