One 🤡 calls it #macrotourism, but #CPI and #FOMC policy response are the single most important issues to macro investors today.
Let’s dig into the 🧮!
2/10
At his Brookings Institute speech at the end of November, Powell broke core #inflation into 3 components:
a) goods inflation
b) housing services inflation
c) services, ex-housing = wages
2a/10
Goods inflation is clearly coming down along with inputs into that equation.
$COOPER +10.65% in November is nonetheless -13% YTD
2b/10
$LUMBER is -64% YTD
2c/10
$COTTON -28% YTD
2d/10
The cost of transporting those goods from places far away have also fallen dramatically, with the #FBX -73.4% YTD
Chart: Freightos Baltic Index (FBX)
2e/10
Used car 🚗 prices, an early driver of inflation, are now little changed on a y/y and m/m basis per #MainheimIndex
3a/10
Food and energy prices have also fallen significantly since the June/July peak
Chart: 🌾$DBA -1.0% YTD
3b/10
Can this be true? The cost of fueling your vehicle is down significantly
Chart: ⛽️ $GASO -7.4% YTD and crashing 📉
4/10
Rents, a proxy for shelter costs which comprise 42% of the #CPI and a lagging indicator among lagging indicators, are +7.8% y/y and -0.97% in November.
To quote Powell, "nominal wages have been growing at a pace well above what would be consistent with 2 percent inflation over time."
5a/10
The market wobbled on December 2 with the release of the November payroll report
Chart: Wages accelerated to +5.1% y/y in the November #NFP report
5b/10
The market wobbled again on Friday with the release of #PPI +7.4%.
The area of specific concern: the index for services for intermediate demand increased 6.7%, the largest 12- month advance since rising 7.9 percent in May.
In advance of #PPI, $TNX had declined -81 bps from the October peak, abruptly reversed course on Friday, rising 17 bps
Chart: $TNX holding trend support
6a/10
$TLT, effectively, the inverse of $TNX, had rising 17% off the October bottom, but gave back 3% on Thursday and Friday
Chart: $TLT stopped in its tracks upon the release of #PPI
7/10
Equity indices, which rose in concert with $TLT (0.2 correlation), gave back some of the October - November gains.
Chart: $SPX -3.37% and a SELL signal on the weekly chart.
8/10
Positive vanna and charm flows from $1 T in notional options expiration this coming Friday were no match for the macro forces (rising wages and persistent inflation) at play.
Chart: $VIX +377 bps on the week a signaling BUY
9/10
With wages continuing ↗️, there is more work to do, per Powell:
"Policies to support labor supply are not the domain of the Fed: Our tools work principally on demand. Job growth remains far in excess of the pace needed to accommodate population growth over time (100K/m)."
9a/10
Notably, both the market and the Treasury have been fighting the Fed.
In particular, Yellen had projected a TGA build to 700B by 12/31. Instead, she has released over -79B from the account last week and no where near 700B.
Chart: TGA to 432B
10/10
#CPI headline consensus = +7.3% y/y down from +7.3% in October
#CPI core consensus = +6.1% y/y down from +6.3% in October
The 🔑 number to watch is core #CPI, which will remain 🛗 and perhaps higher than consensus.
10a/10
With the market and the Treasury fighting 🥊 the Fed, expect a hawkish 🦅 50 BPS hike on Wednesday.
Likely, that is NOT priced in
You know what to do
Have a super profitable 💰 week!
Correction:
#CPI headline consensus = +7.3% y/y down from +7.7% in October
Here's an awesome, much more comprehensive 🧵 on #wages
Jay Powell announced a 50 basis point (bps) cut to the federal funds rate, citing the need for "recalibration" of monetary policy as the economy continues to moderate. The labor market has cooled, with job growth slowing, and inflation remains slightly above target. Powell emphasized that policy adjustments are not on a "pre-set course" and will be made on a meeting-by-meeting basis to support the Fed’s dual mandate of full employment and stable prices. The Fed projects a federal funds rate of 4.4% by year-end, moving towards 3.4% by the end of 2025.
Key Points and Implications:
Rate Cut Justification: The Fed's decision to cut rates by 50 bps reflects a proactive stance in ensuring economic stability, acknowledging moderating growth and softening inflation pressures.
Economic Growth and Labor Market: While growth is forecast at 2.2%, the labor market has softened, with average monthly job gains of 116,000 over the past three months. This cooling labor market suggests the risk of inflation from wage growth has decreased.
Inflation Outlook: Despite inflation remaining above 2%, with core inflation at 2.7%, Powell believes inflation expectations are well anchored and sees the current policy stance as effective in bringing inflation down toward the target.
Future Interest Rate Trajectory: The Fed projects a median federal funds rate of 4.4% by the end of 2024 and 3.4% by the end of 2025. Powell stressed flexibility, indicating future rate cuts will be data-dependent.
Balance Sheet Policy: The balance sheet runoff will continue, with reserves expected to remain stable and abundant. There is no immediate plan to halt the reduction, which could signal tighter liquidity conditions.
Risks to the Economy: Powell highlighted that while the economy remains solid, risks have increased. The Fed is attentive to both its employment and inflation mandates and is prepared to adjust policy as needed.
No Pre-set Course: Powell emphasized that the Fed is not committed to further cuts or hikes at each meeting. They will take a "meeting-by-meeting" approach, carefully assessing economic data.
Housing Sector: Powell noted that housing remains weak, with market rents growing at a slower pace. Housing is expected to normalize as rates stabilize.
Implications for the Economy and Interest Rates:
Short-Term: The rate cut is expected to provide some support to the economy, preventing a sharper slowdown. However, the Fed remains cautious, particularly about the labor market and inflationary pressures.
Long-Term Interest Rate Outlook: The Fed's median projection of a federal funds rate at 3.4% by the end of 2025 suggests a more accommodative stance over time, though the neutral rate could be higher than previously thought.
Labor Market Impact: If labor market weakness continues, the Fed could make additional cuts to support employment, though Powell made it clear they are not currently seeing signs of rising layoffs.
Inflation Risks: With inflation still above the 2% target, the Fed will remain vigilant. The recalibration strategy is aimed at avoiding both excessive inflation and economic contraction.
Potential for Additional Cuts: If the economy weakens or inflation falls faster than expected, further rate cuts are possible, but Powell indicated the Fed will not rush, preferring to evaluate data as it comes in
Average $SPX Returns (All Cycles 1985-2024):
1-month: +1.5%
3-month: +3.5%
12-month: +10.2%
Historically, the stock market's response to Federal Reserve interest rate cutting cycles has varied depending on the economic conditions that prompted the cuts. However, the overall tendency is for the S&P 500 ($SPX) to perform positively in the months following a rate cut, particularly as markets anticipate easier monetary conditions to support economic growth. Below, I'll provide a summary of historical data on how the S&P 500 performed after interest rate cutting cycles since 1985, followed by individual cycles and their performance over 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month time frames.
Interest Rate Cutting Cycles:
1985-1986 Cutting Cycle (Sep 1985 - Aug 1986) Trigger: Slowing economy after early 1980s inflation.
1-month: +2.0%
3-month: +4.0%
12-month: +23.7%
1989-1990 Cutting Cycle (Jun 1989 - Dec 1990) Trigger: Response to rising unemployment and slowing growth.
1-month: +0.5%
3-month: -3.8%
12-month: -2.9%
Key Insights:
Short-term response (1-month): Stock market reactions are mixed, but there is a mild positive bias (+1.5% average). Notable exceptions were during severe financial crises like 2007 and 2020, when the market had a negative 1-month response to rate cuts.
Intermediate-term response (3-month): The S&P 500 tends to perform better over a 3-month horizon after rate cuts, averaging +3.5%. This is a sign that markets begin pricing in the positive effects of lower interest rates, particularly when the cuts are meant to stimulate growth.
Long-term response (12-month): The best returns tend to be over a 12-month horizon, averaging +10.2%. Historically, 12-month performance was particularly strong in the 1995 and 1998 cycles, but weaker in more extreme economic downturns, such as 2001 and 2007.
In general, when rate cuts are made in response to slowing growth but not a full-blown crisis (e.g., 1995 or 1998), the stock market tends to perform well.
However, in more severe economic environments (2001, 2008), the positive effects of rate cuts are not immediately felt, and the stock market can experience continued weakness.
The current 2024 cycle, with the 50 bps cut in September, follows a mixed economic outlook (moderating growth but stable inflation), so the performance could align more closely with "mild slowdown" periods like 1995 or 2019, where cuts preceded solid market performance.
There have been several instances where the Federal Reserve initiated a rate cut while the S&P 500 ($SPX) was near all-time highs. These periods typically occurred when the Fed shifted from a tightening to an easing cycle, despite relatively strong market performance. Below are some notable instances:
1. July 1995
Context: The Federal Reserve cut rates in July 1995 as the economy showed signs of slowing after a period of tightening. The S&P 500 was trading near all-time highs at the time, as the stock market had been performing well.
Market Reaction: Following the rate cuts, the market rallied further, with the S&P 500 posting strong gains over the next year.
2. September 1998
Context: Despite being near record highs in July 1998, the Fed cut rates in response to the Russian debt crisis and the collapse of Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM), which created fears of systemic risk. While the stock market dipped briefly, the S&P 500 was still elevated near its highs compared to past years.
Market Reaction: The S&P 500 rebounded strongly after the rate cuts, with one of the best-performing 12-month periods following a rate cut (up over 30%).
3. July 2019
Context: The Fed began cutting rates in July 2019, following a long tightening cycle that ended in 2018. The S&P 500 was near all-time highs, driven by solid corporate earnings and the market's anticipation of looser monetary policy.
Market Reaction: The S&P 500 continued to climb after the initial cut, gaining around 14.7% over the next 12 months, despite some volatility from global trade tensions and slowing economic growth.
4. July 1997
Context: This was during the late 1990s bull market when the S&P 500 was regularly reaching new highs. Although the Fed wasn’t engaged in significant rate cutting, there were periods of temporary rate adjustments amid a booming stock market.
Market Reaction: The market continued to perform well as growth remained strong and inflation was low.
Key Insights from These Instances:
Rate cuts near market highs often signal a shift in policy in response to external risks or economic moderation, rather than a full-blown crisis.
Short-term caution: In some cases, there is initial volatility following a rate cut, as investors process the reasoning behind the cut, but in the examples noted above, the long-term market reaction has been positive.
Market anticipation: In these instances, the market tends to anticipate rate cuts, so the S&P 500 continues to climb or remain near highs even as the Fed loosens monetary policy.
The 2019 example is particularly relevant to 2024, where the Fed is easing policy despite a relatively resilient stock market, suggesting that stock prices may still have upside potential if economic risks are managed successfully.
I don't know if it's the unwind of the Yen 💹 carry trade, the change in vol 🌊 regime , or a Fed that's too #tight in the face of weak economic date, but risk assets are getting pummeled 🗡️🩸