As a #medicine resident you'll come across ๐๐ป scenario often.
Your #surgery colleagues want you to opine on the type and duration of ANTICOAGULATION and also want to know why it occured in the first place๐คทโโ๏ธ
Yeah, this is obviously a Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) !
It's fairly common, develops in about 1/1000 people ๐ฎ
Remember, DVT+PE = VTE
PE= pulm embolism
VTE= venous thromboembolism
โญ1/3 DVT develop PEโญ
The PE is what can lead to mortality!
Preventing PE is IMPORTANT ๐๐ป
2/24
DVT is not less of a monster !
Many w/ DVT will develop post thrombotic syndrome ๐ฎ That's a lot of morbidity, leg pain, swelling, ulceration and all ๐ญ
But
๐ธWhy does VTE occur ?
๐ธWho's at risk of developing it ?
๐ธCan we prevent it ?
๐ธHow does one treat it ?
3/24
Before we proceed any further, does anyone recognise ๐๐ป gentleman??
4/24
Yes, he's Dr Rudolf Carl Virchow, a ๐ฉ๐ช physician/pathologist.
He coined the terms "thrombosis" & "embolism" amongst others!
The first to propose that clots in the lower limbs "embolize" to the lungs, back in 1856.
THE Virchow after whom Virchow nodes are named!
5/24
Ok, so a clot forms when there's:
1๏ธโฃBad blood (hypercoag)
2๏ธโฃBad vessel (vessel wall injury)
3๏ธโฃLazy blood (stasis)
So, these are the risk factors for VTE: 1. Surgery 2. Immobilization 3. Cancer 4. Pregnancy/post partum 5. Obesity 6. โคด๏ธAge 7. Bad blood (thrombophilia)
6/24
Most of these causes affect >1 of the Virchow triad factors !
As an example, cancer causes stasis + bad blood (cancer procoagulant) + bad vessel ๐ญ
Ok, enough with the history and bad blood etc ๐คฃ
CUS is good for picking up proximal DVT, not so much for distal DVT.
PROXIMAL = above the knee
PROXIMAL = ilio-femoral-popliteal veins
What you need to recognise clinically are the limb threatening signs ๐ฎ
Why?
Because, in addition to anticoag you will need to lyse the clot!
What are these LIMB THREATENING SIGNS?
๐ธAbsent pulse
๐ธCyanosis
๐ธGangrene
This is what we call PHELGMASIA CERULEA DOLENS (PCD) ๐
PCD is the ONLY indication of thrombolysis/ thrombectomy.
And catheter directed is always better than systemic thrombolysis ๐๐ป
13/24
Let's summarise what we've learnt till now !
๐ธDVT is bad/morbid
๐ธRisk โคด๏ธ w/ โคด๏ธage
๐ธHospitalisation/SX is a risk factor
๐ธVirchow triad messed up
๐ธD-dimer negative = DVT unlikely
๐ธCUS is good to pick it up
๐ธPCD needs thrombolysis !!
I've heard so much about these IVC filters, what's all that about ??
I almost never recommend it!
The only indication is:
Acute, proximal leg vein DVT and an ABSOLUTE CONTRAINDICATION to ANTICOAGULATION !
If necessary, place it for the shortest possible time!
Summary slide for those lazy to read the whole thread ๐คทโโ๏ธ
-DVT is common
-โคด๏ธRisk during hospital stay/SX/๐คฐ
-Normal D-dimer can rule it out
-CUS is a good test, sensitiveโ
-DOAC > VKA/heparin
-LWMH = DOAC for cancer asso VTE
-NOAC not safe in pregnancy !
Let's get this right, you'll get a lot of consults for suspected HIT. Most of them won't turn out to be HIT but you must know what to do in case it is HIT !
Is every TCP in a patient receiving heparin, HIT?
NOOOO, obviously NOT