Paige Stanley, PhD Profile picture
Dec 16 β€’ 14 tweets β€’ 4 min read
Happy Friday - let's talk about sexism in academic culture. I've been afraid to be specific about it on social media + have mostly gone silent on here bc of it, but this week was my last straw.

Here's a few examples of blatantly sexist interactions I've had in the past >2 years:
1. When my WOP paper came out last year, I was attacked by white male twitter. I responded relentlessly to their critiques, but it mostly came down to white dudes who a) knew next to nothing about soil C, b) didn't agree with the paper, and c) couldn't fathom being wrong
1a. They collectively had larger followings than me & managed to rally their troops to aid in their attack. They posted multiple rounds of YouTube videos, back-of-the envelope calculations, & threads that were completely inaccurate. But it didn't matter - they had the following.
1b. I couldn't keep up with all the attacks -- it was all day every single day for months. How do they do any work?!?

My continued responses only egged them on, and my silence was evidence to them that I didn't have a counterargument. It was a lose-lose on my end
2. Not limited to my twitter exchanges about the paper, I've been called "naive" a "damsel in distress," an "insecure snob," etc. The list goes on. Most of those tweets have since been deleted, but here's one example. Image
3. I organized a rancher event to present my dissertation results back in April. First, a private email was leaked to me where 2 older white males in admin roles blatantly questioned my credibility, assuming that I had no science to support the topic I planned the event around
3a. I paid for the event with my own grant money, organized it with them for over a year, sent draft docs & solicited feedback more than once. They'd never even reached out to ask me about my methods, the strength of my data, etc etc. All assumptions on their part.
3b. Two weeks before the event, I had this nice little email exchange (separate dude)

The funny part? He was completely wrong about the report that he cited & the state of the science around grazing & SOC. & he had no publications on rangeland SOC + grazing to speak of. Lovely ImageImageImage
3c. He repeatedly called me "Ms." and lashed out after I responded to his email by calling him by his first name and answering his questions calmly and casually. PS I've been repeatedly asked by professors to call them by their first name in post-undergrad settings.
4. In the past 8 months, I've been repeatedly asked what year of grad school I'm in 😐 You guessed it - by all dudes
5. Most recently, I was presenting on my post-doc work at #AGU22. I explicitly spoke on issues of rangeland spatial heterogeneity + sample size-& what we did to overcome it. After my talk, a guy got up &, in a V condescending tone, asked why I *believed* we had enough samples
5a. I explained that I did preliminary power analyses + that the statistic used to determine minimum sample size was different than what he was describing. He just raised his eyebrows + stormed off.

He did this to every female speaker in every session I saw him in this week
6. All of my experiences have one thing in common: white dudes.

I'll also nuance this to say I've had several incredible white male advisors and colleagues, so this isn't unilateral. But it is a commonality that I'm sure isn't limited to just me.
5a. Why...I mean WHY is this the case? The inflated egos, absolute inability to be wrong, & righteousness have become unbearable. As a grad student, I chalked it up to my rank in the hierarchy, but now it's just blatant.

What advice do my lady/female identifying academics have?

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Paige Stanley, PhD

Paige Stanley, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @paigestanley_ag

Oct 5
A long🧡on why policy (vs individual actions) makes more sense as a theory of change towards sustainable agriculture:

1. Policy created the problem. We can trace back origins of industrial ag to "fencerow to fencerow" policies advocated for by Nixon's Secretary of Ag, Earl Butz
2. This was largely to solidify hegemony of the US (among other things like trade aid) early in the industrial rev

3. This is not a simple supply/demand issue. Increased demand of beef did not lead to increased corn production and more beef via feedlots. Industrial policy did ^
4. All that 🌽 production (goodbye, Earl!) had to go somewhere, which is why we feed so much of it to livestock and have created numerous other outlets for its use, including ethanol, food preservatives/sweeteners, etc etc. More 🌽 > more + cheaper πŸ„πŸ”πŸ– > increased consumption
Read 15 tweets
Feb 16, 2021
Let me be clear: when I speak on "regenerative agriculture"-I'm talking about a systems-scale change in our approach to agriculture.

Not just cover crops, compost, rotational grazing, ad-hoc on one farm.

The whole of regenerative ag is equal to more than its constituent parts
When I think of regenerative ag, I'm thinking of an entirely different food system.
- Rewarding multi-functionality vs just yield
- Rethinking ownership of land & resources (cooperatives?)
- Learning from those (largely indigeneous) folx who are already doing these things^
And even bigger, like:
- Ending perverse incentives for monocrops imposed by big trade orgs & deals
- Rebuilding the land-grant complex to not operate on such a knowledge deficit model driven by corporate interests
- Re-linking rural viability to regenerative production systems
Read 8 tweets
Jan 11, 2021
Finally got a chance to read this! Super cool:

- land use change is responsible for a large % of grassland related GHGs
- Overgrazing is associated with shifting grasslands from GHG sink to source
- "sparsely" grazed grasslands are an important C sink

nature.com/articles/s4146…
But, it falls into familiar traps on grazing "intensity". Grazing management can be "intensive" while maintaining other "extensive" characteristics (landscape, low inputs, etc).

LOUDER FOR THE ONES IN THE BACK: grazing "intensity" is not synonymous with overgrazing!!!
Not to sound like a broken record, but we have a lot of work to do to disentangle ideas of "intensity" of inputs/irrigation, w/ "intensity" of management. My research has thus far shown positive soil C & overall CO2e impacts from "intense" grazing management - not vice versa.
Read 7 tweets
Dec 4, 2020
FINALLY our new manuscript is out in @FrontiersIn! Env outcomes of #regenerative multi-species #grazing at @whiteoakpasture w/ full LCA + soil C data

We find support for regenerative ag's potential to help mitigate #climatechange & restore #soilhealth!

frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…
Top-line findings:

- @whiteoakpasture was sequestering 2.29 Mg C/ha/yr, which lowered its LCA footprint by 80%

- when comparing this to commodity animal production, @whiteoakpasture had a 66% lower GHG footprint after considering soil C
- multi-species pasture rotation *did* require more land to produce the same amount of food compared to commodity
- however, this land was restored from degraded cropland (peanut/cotton)
- in short - this does NOT mean that MSPR = deforestation/land use change from native lands
Read 5 tweets
Oct 1, 2020
1) Overselling regenerative agriculture could be the demise of an otherwise promising movement. Can regen ag reverse climate change? NO. Can it sequester C & do other good things? YES YES YES.

But it is maddening to see such BS around its benefits.

civileats.com/2020/10/01/doe…
To be fair, this @CivilEats doesn't get it totally right either. Humus IS πŸ‘ NOT πŸ‘ A πŸ‘ REAL πŸ‘ THING. We have a much more evolved understanding of SOM now.

And no, soil C sequestration *doesn't* have to be accompanied by some crazy rate of fertilizer application. Come on.
This @RodaleInstitute white paper is dangerously incorrect. They misuse data from my own work to say that regen "pasture management" (??) could sequester 114% of all CO2 emissions. Tell that to the arid soils of the Western US. Regionality is a thing.

rodaleinstitute.org/wp-content/upl…
Read 6 tweets
Jul 30, 2020
THREAD: What happens to #carbon once it's sequestered in soils? How can we lock it in & ensure it doesn't return to the atmosphere as CO2?

Soil scientists use "fractionation" methods for that^. Fractionation tells us about different pools of C-some stay forever & some are quick
Consider it like food for the body.

Some of the energy in your food will get used to build your bones-it stays there & is permanent. Some of the energy gets digested & respired as CO2 when you breathe. Not permanent, but you still need it. & some is intermediate-stored as fat.
In soils, we call the permanent fraction MAOM (minerally associated organic matter). This is the soil C that gets stuck to minerals & stays forever.

The faster fraction is called POM (particulate organic matter). This pool is a lot more dynamic

nature.com/articles/s4156…
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(