π§π§π§
436 BILLION copies of spike protein circulating freely in plasma, a month after the Gene therapy vaccine.
In kids.
Their hearts will never fully recover.
You knew that, didn't you?
But there is more than that here...
THREAD [repost]
πππ
Note: This is a repost of an earlier thread that contained an important typo that I felt required a full thread rather than a correction at the end.
To avoid any claims of "misinformation" given how important this is, and how much the thread took off.
Let's resume
πππ
This is the damning graphic.
The vertical scale is a log scale.
The line at about 15pg/ml is the limit of detection, which is why the blue dots are there. There are still up to 100 billion molecules of spike in those patients - 20 days later.
But in some of these cases the concentration of spike is RISING 20 days after vaccination (see the red lines going up), so we have no idea how much is actually circulating.
Spike is toxic, particularly to the heart. If it's not toxic why do we need a "vaccine" against it?
The authors claim that the mean serum level of free spike protein in the patients with myocarditis was 34pg/ml.
(There was less in the non-affected patients, but there was still a lot)
How many molecules is that?
Well there is about 3000ml of plasma in a 70kg male...
And the mol weight of a spike protein monomer is 141kDa. That's 2.34 e-19 grams.
So 34pg/ml x 3000ml is a total of 102ng (102e-9) of spike.
Divide by 2.34e-19 gives you...
435,897,435,897 molecules.
Of a toxic protein.
Circulating in a young adult.
It's worth noting also that the blue dots in the graphic don't indicate "no spike" - they are the lower limits of detection at 15pg/ml. That's a lot of spike.
BUT...
There are two other things that have come out of this paper.
The first is that the amount of spike protein circulating in the PLASMA (when we were told it didn't leave the arm, remember) weeks after the injection is shocking.
But the worst thing about the Yonker #myocarditis study is this - and you might not have realised.
The study showed, beyond a shadow of doubt, that the COVID "vaccine" was causing myocarditis, with elevated troponin (confirming heart damage).
Well, that's a problem
It's a problem because the study authors should have raised an alarm after the first two or three cases.
You see, that was their duty. It was a duty as medical officers and as research officers.
But to our knowledge they said nothing and kept recruiting.
But it didn't matter that young people were getting myocarditis (with a known 5-year mortality of up to 50%). What mattered is finishing the study so they could publish.
Of course, from the home of the #surgisphere authors, what else would you expect?
Keep jabbing.
Thank you to the #mousearmy helpers who pointed out the previous wording error in the post.
Please feel free to add your own description of the number 435,897,435,897 in the comments!
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Does anybody believe any more that the same group of people working for Ecohealth in Australia "discovered" another "novel" bat virus - this time a retrovirus?
It's a massive paper for someone with a limited bio.
Who did the sample collections?
What BSL level lab were these mutation experiments conducted?
Did you induce these mutations with APOBEC? @Daoyu15@humblesci
New FOI release from @USRightToKnow confirms that the Latinne paper - the subject of Peter Daszak's secrecy in respect of missing Genbank sequences - was submitted in August 2019. It discussed the origin of SARS-Cov-2, first touted in Dec 2019 @Daoyu15
BREAKING: After uncovering gross incompetence (or negligence) at the TGA @SenatorRennick asked them what they did about the clearly contaminated batches.
The EMA knew about these humps because they had them analysed. But only to a point.
Not only did they ONLY perform on analysis on the assumption of what they THOUGHT was in the product, but they accepted what now appear to be synthetic Western blots as evidence.
Li-Meng Yan is so incensed that I dared to question the #CCP narrative that she not only retweeted her own tweet (which misrepresented mine) but I received a whole host of CCP bot followers and trolls.
Just to clarify, the tweet was a rebuttal of some account that claimed I had "lost credibility".
There was no disparaging of any tragedy.
It was purely about the staging of the picture....
No problem, just unfollow me.
So why did Li-Meng take such an interest?
So whose side is she on?
I have never been sure since in her first account she seemed to promote the mRNA vaccines.
In this account she is mixed.