INFOGRAPHIC: Key Revelations of the ‘Twitter Files’
Documents revealed by #Twitter’s new owner, tech billionaire @ElonMusk, show the social media company intertwined with a government-private censorship apparatus. (Thread👇)
#Twitter, under government pressure, suppressed or removed content on various subjects, though most of the time it was cooperating with the #Censorship requests willingly, the documents indicate.
Musk took over #Twitter in October, taking the company private.
He then fired around half of the staff and much of the upper management. The “#TwitterFiles” releases have been part of @elonmusk's promised focus on transparency for the company.
Musk allowed several independent journalists to submit search queries that were then used by #Twitter staff to search through the company’s internal documents, sometimes under the condition that the resulting stories would be first published on the platform itself.
The two journalists primarily responsible for the releases have been journalists @mtaibbi and @bariweiss.
Both are liberals who have expressed disillusionment with the more extreme currents of progressivism and neoliberalism.
Others involved in the releases have been independent journalists @lhfang and @davidzweig, former New York Times reporter @AlexBerenson, as well as author and environmentalist Michael @ShellenbergerMD.
The journalists have only released a fraction of the documents they reviewed. They’ve also redacted the names of employees involved, other than some high-level executives.
The documents show that the #FBI and other agencies have been scrutinizing the political speech of Americans on a significant scale, and trying to get lawful speech suppressed or removed online.
Many have deemed that a violation of the First Amendment.
The #FBI had its sweep #Twitter to identify content and accounts that it tried to get removed, even though the content didn't necessarily violate any laws.
Elvis Chan coordinated communication with Twitter leadership for the FBI and the broader intelligence community.
Members of the Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF) regularly met with #BigTech executives.
FTIF allegedly employed dozens of #FBI agents to sift through social media to find content supposedly coming from malicious foreign actors and flagging such content for censorship.
[Redacted], a Twitter executive who previously worked for the #CIA, wrote an email suggesting that #Twitter wouldn't dare to disobey a takedown request, because the media fallout of the government publicly labeling the account in question as run by Russian intelligence.
The @StateDept's Global Engagement Center (GEC) would flag thousands of accounts for #Twitter.
For many of the accounts, Twitter couldn't find any association with foreign government actors, the documents indicate.
In 2017, the @DeptofDefense asked #Twitter to give preferential treatment to dozens of accounts used for influence operations in Arab countries.
Some local police departments were also implicated in making #Censorship requests to #Twitter.
In one example supplied by @mtaibbi, the Minnesota Police Dept. reached out to Twitter via the local #FBI—the request was funneled through by Elvis Chan.
State governments also submitted content takedown requests to #Twitter via the #FBI, according to @mtaibbi.
Corporate media also appear to have been a part of an indirect enforcement mechanism for #Censorship.
Content and accounts claimed by the government would be provided to the media, which would then pressure #Twitter to act.
The @DHSgov runs the @CISAgov and finances the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center, a system that allows state officials to share data on election misinformation and facilitate removal of such content online.
In 2020, @CISAgov partnered with EIP, a group that would flag election "misinformation" to social media companies.
A CISA official acknowledged the agency forwarded to social media companies content moderation requests submitted to EI-ISAC by state and local election officials.
EI-ISAC encourages election officials to report "misinformation" or "disinformation," which is then forwarded to @CISAgov, which "will submit it to the relevant social media platform(s) for review."
EIP leader Alex Stamos said the group would "fill the gap" in countering election disinformation that the government wasn't authorized to address.
The @EI_Partnership took credit for facilitating the removal of suppression of 22 million pieces of online content and dozens of entire "narratives."
The "Twitter Files" indicate that #Twitter executives felt pressured to find more accounts that could be attributed to foreign interference and to comply with takedown requests in order to avoid costly new legislation and negative media coverage spurred by lawmakers.
The Senate Intelligence Committee put pressure on #Twitter to remove foreign accounts, especially Russian accounts.
The Committee's head, Sen. @MarkWarner, was displeased with Twitter's inability to find substantial Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Trump campaign manager Mike Hahn demanded answers from Twitter.
#COVID19 guidelines by the @CDCgov were used as a measure for what could and couldn't be said on the platform.
Yet the guidelines themselves has been guesswork to some degree as the scientific understanding of the virus has been a matter of ongoing debate and remains incomplete.
Reported @davidzweig "found countless instances of tweets being labeled as 'misleading' or taken down entirely, sometimes triggering account suspensions, simply because they veered from CDC guidance or differed from establishment views."
Since the start of the Biden administration, the @NSF has given nearly $40 million to universities to counter "disinformation" or "misinformation."
At least one of the grants reportedly targets "populist communication" to determine "how to best counter populist narratives."
🚨 CCP Targets Shen Yun, NYT Coverage Raises Questions
“Two years ago, we learned the CCP planned to escalate its war on us in America. Now, we’re facing legal weaponization, media smears, and threats to bomb, shoot, and rape our performers.”
— Shen Yun VP Ying Chen
🧵A Thread
Sabotage Campaign. Shen Yun Performing Arts is facing mounting challenges. Recent incidents include bomb threats, sabotage such as tire-slashing, and a wave of disinformation aimed at disrupting its global performances. Evidence points to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as the driving force behind these efforts. Meanwhile, the New York Times’ reporting on the group has drawn scrutiny for its alignment with Beijing’s narrative—here’s what’s happening to the U.S.-based arts group.
Global Tours. Shen Yun tours the world to top theaters to showcase China’s true cultural heritage through classical Chinese dance and music—traditions the CCP has tried to erase for decades. Its popularity has made it a target for attack on U.S. soil and around the world.
THREAD 🧵
Corruption is an “endemic feature” of China under communist rule due to the opaque political system in the party-state and the lack of checks and balances, according to a recent U.S. intelligence report.
The report, released on March 20 by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), states that bribery increases “an official’s legal earnings by four to six times.”
It also reported that Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping and his family had amassed more than $1 billion in wealth as of 2012.
Since Xi assumed power in 2012, information on corruption among CCP officials has been more challenging to obtain, the report said, adding that Xi’s family is known to have held at least millions in financial investments as of last year.
The Intelligence Authorization Act of 2023 required the ODNI to produce an unclassified report for the general public on the wealth and corruption of senior CCP leaders. Marco Rubio, currently U.S. secretary of state, inserted that requirement into the bill when he was vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
THREAD 🧵
British chat forums are shutting themselves down rather than face regulatory burdens recently applied to internet policing laws.
On March 17, the United Kingdom’s Online Safety Act, a law that regulates internet spaces, officially kicked into force.
The law means that online platforms must immediately start putting in place measures to protect people in the UK from criminal activity with far-reaching implications for the internet.
However, for some forums—from cyclists, hobbyists, and hamster owners, to divorced father support and more—the regulatory pressure is proving too much, and its myriad of rules are causing chat forums that have been operating for decades, in some cases, to call it a day.
Conservative Peer Lord Daniel Moylan told The Epoch Times by email that “common sense suggests the sites least likely to survive will be hobby sites, community sites, and the like.”
‘Small But Risky Services’
The Act—which was celebrated as the world-first online safety law—was designed to ensure that tech companies take more responsibility for the safety of their users.
For example, social media platforms, including user-to-user service providers, have the duty to proactively police harmful illegal content such as revenge and extreme pornography, sex trafficking, harassment, coercive or controlling behavior, and cyberstalking.
But what the government calls “small but risky services” which are often forums, have to submit illegal harms risk assessments to the Online Safety Act’s regulator, Ofcom, by March 31.
Ofcom first published its illegal harm codes of practice and guidance in December 2024 and had given providers three months to carry out the assignment.
It was given powers under the law and warned that those who fail to do so may face enforcement action.
“We have strong enforcement powers at our disposal, including being able to issue fines of up to 10 percent of turnover or £18 million ($23 million)—whichever is greater—or to apply to a court to block a site in the UK in the most serious cases,” said Ofcom.
Some of the rules for owners of these sites—which are often operated by individuals —include keeping written records of their risk assessments, detailing levels of risk, and assessing the “nature and severity of potential harm to individuals.”
While terrorism and child sexual exploitation may be more straightforward to assess and mitigate, offenses such as coercive and controlling behavior and hate offenses are more challenging to manage with forums that have thousands of users.
Gamers total 71 percent of the U.S. population and, on average, spend at least one month per year gaming. How does this affect emotions, cognition, and senses?
Research from over 90 medical reports highlights the impact on 15+ parts of the brain, as shown in this infographic:
From the Atari 2600 to the PS5, from Zelda to Fortnight, from mobile app games to gaming PCs, billions of players worldwide engage in gaming.
First, here's a quick breakdown of game design.
Game design incorporates three major strategies to keep players hooked:
1. Game Juice
The color, touch, and sound effects that are designed to sync with the brain’s inherent set of rules give players a rewarding sense of control over in-game changes, tricking the brain into perceiving the game world as both real and charming.