A core tenet of traditional financial education is that when you invest, it should be done in businesses that can support their own existence. This has changed in recent decades.
Now, it's about numbers going up at ever higher rates instead of sound fundamentals...
2/ Tech Boom
The problem stems from the 90s tech bubble. All of a sudden you had hyper scalable tech, and it was difficult to value, as the same infrastructure could service a million or a billion users.
Growth, not profitability, became the prime focus.
3/ No Dividends
Amazon popularized the growth mindset, where profitability is spurned in favor of growth.
Then, when the 2000s dot-com crash happened, they were one of the few left standing, and became the standard to follow into the future
From their 1997 Annual Returns:
4/ Hindsight
Amazon was one of the most extraordinary investments ever. Had you invested a single dollar after the dot-com crash, you could have made $185 within two decades.
That's why it became the model for tech firms to follow, it became known as "Blitzscaling".
5/ Blitzscaling
This new way of doing business, of losing money while scaling to your target audience and only then trying to find a way of making your business profitable, is reliant on the goodwill of investors with infinitely deep pockets - this is due to "cheap money".
6/ Quantitive Easing
In 2008, due to a collapse of the world economy, many developed nations began printing money - AND LOTS OF IT - which was then used to bail out markets and push down the cost of interest rates.
Rates went down so much that rich people were PAID to BORROW $.
7/ Rich Investors
The problem with having a lot of money is that eventually you run out of places to put it in. After all, there are only so many billions you can put into Google before valuations look ridiculous, so investors started looking elsewhere and with little prejudice.
8/ Silicon Valley
This cheap money, euphemistically called "helicopter money", was used to invest in projects that had a low chance of success, but high reward potential
Investors would place "small" bets on thousands of these companies. So if one succeeded it paid for the rest
9/ Growth Beyond Sense
With this seemingly infinite supply of money, and a mandate to grow at all costs, startups started doing silly things - they began designing business models where they would lose money with each client that they got, with no clear way towards profit.
10/ Accidental Ponzis
Given no clear path to making money and reliance on ever increasing piles of cash to survive, these investments started adopting Ponziesque traits. Price/Earnings ratio climbed, meaning investors paid 100s of dollars per $ of revenue - this is unsustainable
11/ Startup Culture
These companies know they have to show a high level of growth, so it's normal for startups to spend over 50% of their investor funds on marketing and increasing their user base, as opposed to designing a workable product that can break even.
12/ Capitalist Socialism
During the last decade of cheap money, many services that we use in our day-to-day lives have been made artificially cheap. The average Westerner has gotten used to cheap rides, free deliveries, etc., indirectly subsidized by investors with money to burn
13/ A Large Part of the Economy
If we look at the S&P 500 (a list of the 500 biggest companies in the US stock market) the top 5 are tech companies and account for over 20% of the list. Startups similarly comprise a dynamic portion of the global economy.
14/ Lots of Dependents
So influential are these tech companies & their way of doing things that there are entire financial ecosystems built around them. There are armies of cleaners, consultants, accountants, lawyers, etc. - they aren't in the tech sector but are dependent on it
15/ Party's Over
The problem now is that inflation has been ruining people's livelihoods, and the status quo of cheap money has come to a rapid end. Interest rates are spiking and with them, investor patience for perpetually unprofitable startups is evaporating.
16/ Memento Mori
Investors don't need to try to kill tech startups for them to die, they're so fragile that if they don't get a steady stream of investor cash, they die as they don't have any profit
Then it might just be a domino effect of startups and their dependents.
17/ Adapt or Die
Bear markets are often the grounds for unicorns, billion-dollar companies, to be born. This happens because, in their effort to survive, they end up having to change to suit the new landscape.
18/ End of Blitzscaling?
Now that the business model of essentially paying people to become your customers is no longer workable, what comes after?
Blitzscaling makes sense in some ventures, but in most others, businesses will have to scale back and become sustainable.
19/ Blitzscaling & Crypto
Given that blockchain is Silicon Valley adjacent, it has picked up many of the bad habits of its older brother. Over the coming years, utility and not hype will determine the success and viability of projects.
20/ Conclusion
Every era has a dominant business model likely to allow companies to get funding and thrive. The era of low interest rates prioritized breadth over depth.
The winds are changing, reality is reasserting itself, and the businesses which recognize this will thrive.
If you enjoyed this thread, please like, retweet the first post, and subscribe to @axotrade 🧵
For something more in-depth, make sure to check out our ongoing History of Finance series:
Memecoin fever has gripped Cardano, and it has a lot of people confused. How is it possible that in the midst of the iciest of bear markets, there is still enough dry powder to create a speculative mania?
Today we will be discussing the economics of memecoins.
2/ On the Origin of Memecoins
Memes are units of culture, they’re small packets of information that contain a basic idea that is interesting enough to get passed on and evolve through each generation it exists in.
Memecoins, on the other hand, are tokenized viral ideas.
- Active: Where you make regular decisions to address your investing needs
- Passive: Where you fund a specific strategy & keep doing so indefinitely
Both have their benefits and weaknesses, which we will explore in this thread.
2/ Active Investing
When the average person thinks about investing, they think of active investing - of an investor finding some secret pattern in the data and striking it rich because of it. Unfortunately, the reality is more complicated than that.
DeFi will defy expectations - why on-chain identities are essential for mass adoption of #Cardano.
- Thread Time 🧵-
1/ Intro
Now that the angry dust is clearing from the contingent staking debate, perhaps it's worth discussing why on-chain identity verification can be very important to mass adoption.
It's not without its tradeoffs, but it is needed if we want to fully bloom to our potential
2/ Adoption
If you want to attract the enormous liquidity of financial institutions, you need to allow for TradFi to work in DeFi by allowing legacy operational procedures to work on-chain.
In other words, users need to have freedom to decide how and when transactions execute.
Bears are vicious creatures, you blink for a second, and they can rip away any gains you had with a single swipe.
In this thread, we'll discuss the three genres of assets and how to build a portfolio that can not only survive the bear market but thrive.
2/ Asset Genres
Whether you're talking about stocks, real estate, commodities, etc., they all broadly fall into three broad archetypes that denote their behavior within a complex system:
Cardano is entering the age of Voltaire, the age of community governance.
This is going to be a critical development period, which will, in no small part, determine the future of the blockchain.
In this thread, we'll discuss the pitfalls and solutions to governance.
2/ 1st Principles
The problem that governance seeks to solve is what is termed in finance as the "principal-agent problem" (PAP), as in when stakeholders nominate someone to represent them, but they're unsure if the agent will act in the stakeholder's best interests or their own