NEW: The Delegated Powers & Regulatory Reform Committee in the @UKHouseofLords has just published its report on the Retained EU Law Bill and it doesn't mince its words. It calls for 5 of the 6 most important provisions in the Bill to be removed. #REUL publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5803/ldse…
The report demolishes the Govt's argument that this Bill will re-establish Parliament as the principal source of law in the UK. It won't. The Bill undermines Parliament by granting Ministers 'extraordinary powers' to dispose, retain, or re-write #REUL by Statutory Instrument.
The report then hammers the absence of policy substance in the #REUL Bill. It's "all powers, no policy" says the Cmtt. The Bill is so lacking in substance it's not a skeletal Bill it's 'hyper-skeletal'.
In short, the Delegated Powers Cmtt are not happy at all with the #REUL Bill and their report provides Peers with plenty of ammunition for the 2nd Reading debate on Monday 6/2.
If you want to keep up to date with our latest work on the #REUL Bill, on delegated powers in other Bills, and our wider work on parliamentary scrutiny sign up to our Newsletter, or why not consider donating to help us keep doing this work in the future! hansardsociety.org.uk/about/connect
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵1/ In his final newsletter of the year @pmdfoster suggests if you're interested in the #REUL Bill then you should read the evidence that I and @SirJJKC gave last month to the @UKHouseofLords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee.
2/ For all the talk by ministers that the process to review Retained EU Law will be straightforward, 2 SIs published this week illustrate the risk of sunset deadlines and how the review process will involve grindingly difficult technical policy & legislative drafting work.
3/ The two SIs are the Plant Health & Trade in Animals and Related Products (Amendment) Regulations 2022 and the Health and Safety and Nuclear (Fees) Regulations 2022). It's complicated, so bear with me......
Today, amidst the political turmoil, the Energy Prices Bill (to implement the Energy Price Guarantee & Energy Bill Relief Scheme) will go through all its @HouseofCommons stages in just 1 day, only 5 days after it was published. It's an incredibly important Bill so here's a 🧵1/
Our @HansardSociety focus is on the delegated powers in the Bill. Ministers (the Secretary of State (SoS)) are asking @UKParliament to confer some very broad powers on them... with potentially huge spending implications... over which MPs will have little influence and control 2/
So, MPs need clarity about how the powers will be used and whether some constraints are needed. Today will be their one chance to scrutinise / amend the provisions. Once the Bill gets Royal Assent there will be little opportunity to comment and hold Ministers to account. 3/
2/ This is the paper that led the Commissions of both Houses to conclude earlier this month that the work should not proceed as originally envisaged.
3/ The cost of the Essential Scheme (original plan, requiring full decant from the Palace) is estimated at between £7bn (at P50 risk level risk so 50% chance of outcome being achieved) & £13bn (at P80 or 80% chance of outcome being achieved). This doesn’t account for inflation.
🧵1/ Interesting test of govt’s commitment to parliamentary scrutiny coming up this week. Will the Statutory Instrument(s) introducing new #Coronavirus restrictions to tackle the #OmicronVariant be debated in a timely way after they are laid before @UKParliament on Mon (29/11)?
3/ There are a few important things to unpick here. There may be more than one Statutory Instrument (SI). Travel and face covering SIs have previously been made using powers in the Public Health (Control of Diseases) Act 1984 but subject to different scrutiny procedures.
🧵1/ Yet again the govt uses the urgency procedure in the Public Health Act 1984 to introduce regulations before they are scrutinised and approved by Parliament. This time the Step 3 Regulations for 'unlockdown' in England which come into force on Mon 17/5 #SIWatch ⬇️
2/ Given they've known for weeks what was coming in Step 3 why was the legal text not published earlier for approval by MPs? The devil is in the legal detail but ministers constantly try to blur the issue by conflating debate about general policy with scrutiny of legal text.
3/ The govt argues in the Explanatory Memo that MPs debated Step 3 on 25 March. But that was a debate on Regs to implement the start of the roadmap, renew the Coronavirus Act, & extend temporary Standing Orders for virtual participation in proceedings. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/585/…
If the @HouseofCommons is recalled, due to #Covid or negotiations with the EU, there's no provision for virtual proceedings to apply to legislation. MPs can vote via proxy on SIs or a bill, but they can only participate in a debate on legislation if they are in the Chamber (2/12)
The only way currently for MPs to take part in a debate on Covid-SIs or a Bill enshrining a deal with the EU will be to travel to Westminster in Tier 4. Is this wise given the PMs statement about the severity of the situation and the announcements in Scotland & Wales? (3/12)