#10yrsago Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan invests in Internet surveillance company that backstops notorious dictatorships thestar.com/opinion/editor… 4/
#10yrsago Website copies articles documenting scandal of disgraced cancer researcher, then uses DMCA to get the originals censored arstechnica.com/science/2013/0… 5/
My ebooks and audiobooks (from @torbooks, @HoZ_Books, @mcsweeneys, @beaconPressBks et al) are for sale all over the net, but I sell 'em too, and when you buy 'em from me, I earn twice as much and you get books with no DRM and no license "agreements."
If you're a @Medium subscriber, you can read these essays - as well as previews of upcoming magazine columns and early exclusives on doctorow.medium.com.
My latest Medium column is "Small Government: refs have to be more powerful than players"
If you prefer a newsletter, subscribe to the plura-list, which is also ad- and tracker-free, and is utterly unadorned save a single daily emoji. Today's is "👩🏿🦰". Suggestions solicited for future emojis!
Are you trying to wean yourself off Big Tech? You can read my work elsewhere, but it is now a #TwitterCrime to tell you how. Please visit my site, pluralistic.net, for links to find me on less-unhinged places (I can only imagine that my days here are numbered). 20/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
History is written by the winners, which is why #Luddite is a slur meaning "technophobe" and not a badge of honor meaning, "Person who goes beyond asking what technology does, to asking who it does it *for* and who it does it *to*."
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
Luddites weren't anti-machine activists, they were pro-#worker advocates, who believed that the spoils of automation shouldn't automatically be allocated to the bosses who skimmed the profits from their #labor and spent them on machines that put them out of a job. 3/
Hey, @mattearoach, there were some weird things going on with the crime statistics on this week's Backbench. We were told that violent crime was up and then told that housebreaking is a violent crime? I don't think that's how most people understand 'violent.'
Then, we were told that there were 2 million crimes reported to police and that this was up by 25,000 - which is 1/80th of 2 million. But then we were told that violent crime is up 5%. Is this an artifact of classing breaking and entering as violent?
I mean it seems to me like we could say crime in Canada went up by about 1% and a small fraction of that ~1% was violent crime. That to me does not sound like a significant increase in threats to public safety.