#Breaking Delhi High Court holds that 'virginity test' conducted on a female detainee or accused is Unconstitutional and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution and right to dignity. #DelhiHighCourt#VirginityTest
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma holds that conducting virginity test not only amounts to interference with the bodily integrity but also psychological integrity of a woman.
This will have serious and profound effects on the mental health of a woman, the court says.
"Conducting a virginity test on the pretext of reaching truth regarding allegations against her (female detainee) will amount to infringement and violation of her right enshrined in Article 21 and explained in the judgment of D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal." #VirginityTest
Justice Sharma says that the test brings forth the
"undesirable and abhorrable notion of differentiation on the basis of gender and stereotypes". #DelhiHighCourt#VirginityTest
The court made the declaration in a case concerning the virginity test conducted by the CBI on sister Sephy, a nun who was convicted in sister Abhaya murder case of the year 1992. #DelhiHighCourt#VirginityTest
In a detailed judgement, bench notes that there is no procedure, under any law which provides for “virginity test” of a female accused. #DelhiHighCourt#VirginityTest
"Virginity testing is a form of inhuman treatment and the same violates the principle of human dignity." #DelhiHighCourt#VirginityTest
"The test, being violative of right to dignity of an individual, cannot be resorted to by the State and the same shall be in teeth of the scheme of Indian Constitution and the right to life enshrined under
Article 21." #DelhiHighCourt#VirginityTest
Justice Sharma rejected the argument conducting this test on a woman who is victim of sexual assault and on a woman who may be an accused of an offence will be on different footing. #DelhiHighCourt#VirginityTest
"[It] will be a perverse finding and against the
intent of the Constitution of India and Article 21," the court concluded. #DelhiHighCourt#VirginityTest
"Some fundamental rights cannot be suspended or infringed or abridged even when a person is in custody and right to dignity is one such fundamental right which falls within the ambit of Article 21." #DelhiHighCourt#VirginityTest
Justice Sharma has ordered that the information about the test being declared unconstitutional should be circulated to all investigating agencies through MHA, MoHFW. #DelhiHighCourt#VirginityTest
The court has also directed the Delhi Judicial Academy to include this information in its curriculum and in the workshops for investigating officers, prosecutors and other stakeholders.
The Delhi Police commissioner has been directed to ensure that the investigating offers are informed and sensitised in this regard.
On the issue of Sister Sephy's prayer for action against CBI for conducting the test, the court said that at the relevant time the test was not barred in law.
With respect to leaking of the information about the test report and false theory of hymenoplasty which allegedly amounted to Sister Sephy's defamation, the court said that there are other remedies available to the petitioner. #DelhiHighCourt#SisterSephy#AbhayaMurderCase
On the issue of grant of compensation, the bench said that the NHRC will consider afresh the representation filed by Sister Sephy regarding custodial torture once the criminal trial concludes. #DelhiHighCourt#SisterSephy#AbhayaMurderCase
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Rishab Shetty and Vijay Kiragandur, the director and producer respectively of Kannada movie Kantara move #SupremenCourt challenging anticipatory bail condition imposed by Kerala HC where production before IO on Sundays was mandated
The petitioners were booked for copyright infringement over the song Varaha Roopam
Sr Adv Ranjit Kumar appears for petitioners
CJI DY Chandrachud: We will take this up before we rise for today #SupremeCourt
CJI: you are using this music in Kantara?
Singh: yes they are saying it is from Vara Roopam
Justice PS Narasimha: But this is movie is there for a year #Kantara
Constitution bench of the #SupremeCourt Constitution Bench to deliver verdict on the petitions challenging the validity of the All India Bar Exam #AIBE
The three main issues which the judgment will answer are:
Can the Bar Council of India (BCI) prescribe a pre-enrolment exam as a condition precedent for enrolment?
Can BCI prescribe pre-enrolment training in terms of its training rules issued in 1995?
The last issue for consideration was: If a pre-enrolment exam is not permitted, can BCI prescribe a post-enrolment exam in alignment with Section 49 (1) (ah) of Advocates Act, 1961?
#SupremeCourt Constitution Bench of Justices Kaul, Khanna, Abhay S Oka, Vikram Nath and JK Maheshwari will deliver judgment on whether the #Bohra community has the right to excommunicate dissidents in exercise of its fundamental rights under Article 25 and 26 of the Constitution
The top court will lay down the law regarding the correctness of its 1962 judgment in Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin v. The State Of Bombay, in which it had protected the rights of the Bohra community to excommunicate members #SupremeCourt#Bohra
Court: Decision of constitution bench requires reconsideration. We have recorded reasons. There are two grounds.
Gujarat High Court reserves orders in a petition by Gujarat University challenging direction to furnish copies of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's degree certificate to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta for the University argued before bench of Justice Biren Vaishnav.
SG: There is nothing to hide as the degree is there in public domain, on social media etc. But we cannot be compelled to disclose the information. @PMOIndia
SG: We cannot be asked to furnish the information to satisfy someone's childish and irresponsible curiousity. Also, it should be noted that the info sought has nothing to do with his (Narendra Modi's) role as a public figure. @PMOIndia@ArvindKejriwal
TMC MP @jawharsircar on Law Ministry stating that differences of opinion between executive and judiciary are mutually reconciled: So am I to understand that all differences are mutually reconciled?...
...And in the same sentence you have used the words, "Only the appropriate person is appointed as a judge". Do you consider Victoria Gowri's appointment to really (be of) an appropriate person? One who has been accused in public of casteist remarks, of remarks against minorities?