Live now: State of the Net conference #SOTN, featuring Assistant Attorney General for #antitrust Jonathan Kanter & @B_Fung

stateofthenet.org/sotn-23/
#SOTN #Section230 panel opens with @ma_franks claiming the law protects only against liability for defamation and related claims supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/2…

If that were all 230 did, why did Congress spell out things didn't 230 affect completely unrelated to defamation and the like?
@ma_franks .@MA_Franks relies entirely on the "Good Samaritan" heading for 230(c) to argue that (c)(1) must require good faith efforts to block content. If Congress had intended to make (c)(1) immunity contingent on good faith, it would have said so, as it did in (c)(2)(A)

#SOTN
Typical nonsense from @JoelThayer, claiming that overly broad interpretations of #Section230 (c)(1) are to blame for "censoring" conservatives

Nope. That would be... the First Amendment

#SOTN
And no, Congress can't just declare platforms to be public accommodations to stop them from being mean to MAGA nutters because, yup, again, the First Amendment

@AriCohn & I cut through this 💩 when Justice Thomas started making it up
lawfareblog.com/justice-thomas…

#SOTN
@AriCohn Remember, there was a vacancy at the FCC for @SimingtonFCC only because Trump refused to renominate @MPORielly after he dared to suggest to restate longstanding Republican opposition to "fairness doctrine" regulation of media (which Republicans now want for "Big Tech")

#SOTN
@AriCohn @SimingtonFCC @MPORielly Do we not have de facto net neutrality at this moment [even without Title II]?
- @SimingtonFCC

Yup. It's what @BinaryBits called "The Durable Internet" back in 2008 cato.org/policy-analysi…

#SOTN
@AriCohn @SimingtonFCC @MPORielly @binarybits Does the FCC have the authority to regulate Big Tech?

@SimingtonFCC thinks 2020 blog post by FCC GC Tom Johnson resolved this issue fcc.gov/news-events/bl…

But even if the FCC can issue an interpretive 230 rule, the real question is what deference courts will give it...

#SOTN
@AriCohn @SimingtonFCC @MPORielly @binarybits SCOTUS is increasingly unwilling to defer to agency interpretations of statutes that claim power to decide major questions, eg online speech: "[We] expect Congress to speak clearly if it wishes to assign to an agency decisions of vast economic and political significance."

#SOTN
Speech is nuanced
Speech is complicated
Speech is the anthesis of scalability
- @TechEthicist 👏

#SOTN
Lots of talk about transparency for content moderation at #SOTN2023 #SOTN

The 11th Circuit upheld Florida's transparency mandate. As @TechFreedom's amicus brief explained, that mandate unconstitutionally entangles the state in content moderation

supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/2…
@TechFreedom Travis LeBlanc on the EU Court of Justice striking down repeated US/EU data flow agreements: Data protectionism may be masquerading as data protection

#SOTN

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Berin Szóka 🇺🇦🌐

Berin Szóka 🇺🇦🌐 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BerinSzoka

Mar 7
1. I've disagreed with @gigibsohn about the biggest telecom issues for 15 years—but those issues aren't why her nomination floundered. Multiple Dem Senators feared supporting someone who had called out Fox for what it was in the Trump years: "state-sponsored propaganda"
2. In 2020, Senate Republicans summoned Twitter, Facebook & Google CEOs for a hearing on their alleged "bias" against conservatives. The Dem chair asked why broadcasters weren't there. Gigi tweeted this:
3. 🐘s claim Gigi wants to "censor" Fox News. Nonsense. She merely objected to🐘s weaponizing the hearing against new media companies they hate for nakedly political reasons, while saying nothing about old media that spew MAGA propaganda
Read 15 tweets
Sep 16, 2022
The Fifth Circuit opinion just dropped, upholding Texas's law compelling social media sites to host speech they don't want to host.

techfreedom.org/wp-content/upl…
The court refused to strike down the TX law as facially unconstitutional because of overbreadth, suggesting that it would have to be challenged as to specific applications

Just like Florida's 1903 must-carry mandate was unconstitutional as applied to all newspapers all the time? Image
lol no

The Packingham Court referred to tech companies as "town squares" in a purely colloquial sense. The case involved a state law compelling tech companies not to host sex offenders, so the Court didn't say anything about whether they were public fora absent such compulsion Image
Read 23 tweets
Sep 15, 2022
1/ Today, the #FTC will vote to issue a staff report about last year's workshop on Dark Patterns—at which Prof. @harrybr, who helped coined the term, warned that it was "vague." Let's hope the report gets a lot more specific about what kind of cases the FTC will bring Image
2/ The concept of “darkness” implies that consumers are necessarily unaware of what is happening. This kind of opacity may be problematic, but by itself, insufficient under Section 5(n) of the FTC Act. Image
3/ An unfair practice must involve harm that is not “reasonably avoidable by consumers themselves.” In other words, it is the harm, not the practice that must be obscure to consumers.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 10, 2022
Before #EARNITAct markup, a @SenateJudiciary Culture Wars kerfuffle

January: @MarshaBlackburn asked a black appellate nominee (Andre Mathis) about his "rap sheet" (actually 3 decade-old traffic tickets)

Today, @SenAlexPadilla complained about this... 🧵ballsandstrikes.org/nominations/an…
Blackburn was pissed that Biden nominated Mathis to an appeals court in Tennessee over the "blue slip" objections of both TN Republican Senators

Trump bypassed 17 Dem blue slips

So Blackburn focused on Mathis's "rap sheet," implying that getting 3 tickets made him a criminal
"RAP" means "Record of Arrests and Prosecutions"

a "RAP sheet" is a list of criminal charges

It's NOT getting three traffic tickets a decade ago
Read 10 tweets
Feb 10, 2022
.@SenateJudiciary is marking up #EARNITAct, which claims to crack down on child sexual abuse material but will really jeopardize prosecutions. Forcing tech firms not to use strong encryption & to monitor users makes them state actors who need a warrant 🧵

judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/02/03…
#EARNITAct's sponsors say they've fixed the bill. They haven't. Making the "best practices" "voluntary" doesn't help. The 4th Amd./privacy problem has always been come from exposing tech companies to such vast liability that they *must* monitor what users say & abandon encryption
#EARNITAct was changed in 2020 to "fix" the liability it enables under federal law (by tying it to "actual knowledge", but it then does exactly the same thing through the back door: enabling states to enforce criminal & civil laws that turn on mere recklessness or negligence
Read 50 tweets
Oct 14, 2021
1/ Democrats want to stop websites from spreading hate speech, misinformation, etc

But this bill would do the opposite; it would do exactly what the Trump administration wanted—because @EnergyCommerce Dems still don't understand how #Section230 works
2/ The bill would expose many websites to liability, both civil and criminal, for making recommendations. States will enforce existing laws & write new ones, and we'll spend years litigating them under the First Amendment

But that's not all the bill does...
3/ The bill turns off (c)(1) protections "with respect to information" subject to a "personalized recommendation"

Thus, a website could be sued both for recommending content and also for trying to stop its spread once it's been "recommended" by automated, algorithmic processes
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(