Sr Adv Vikas Singh: First of all, I'd like to thank you for hearing this on behalf of the bar. The bar is grateful. And we will never do anything to undermine the authority of this institution.
Singh: There is no way we can grow. For our futuristic planning, Supreme Court can see this. Lawyers will keep going. So if you could consider issuing notice in that too, I'd be grateful.
CJI DY Chandrachud: Lawyers are a part of us. It's a part of our institution. If we use our judicial orders, it's a message- look what is the Supreme Court doing. You're taking judicial powers and using it for your expansion. Today it is land, tomorrow it will be something else
CJI DY Chandrachud: We can take it up with the government administratively. This has been the old tradition of judiciary in our country. CJI who represents the institution, we engage with the government, we say look our needs for future are expanding.
Singh: My purpose is to start engagement from the judicial side. Engagement would not be on administrative side.
CJI DY Chandrachud: The government does engage with us on the administrative side. For example, for E-courts project the government allotted us 7000 crores because they said you need it.
Justice Kaul: We're doing the preliminary, once we're done with that and we need to see what is allotted to who, we'll certainly have bar representatives.
Sr Adv Meenakshi Arora: On behalf of SCAORA, there is a requirement that AORs need to have chambers within 6 kms of court. 800 AORs are entitled for chambers. AORs itself represents a body which is very integral.
Singh: Unfortunately, we have no say on the administrative side. This land was taken on our petition. The land was handed to us for SupremeCourt and lawyers chambers.
Justice Narasimha: So far as analysation is concerned, administrative side would be much fruitful. We can work it out. We've told you also, on administrative side...
Singh: I feel that we're not a part of administrative process.
Arora: Land which is earmarked for us- it doesn't meet requirements.
We want to engage with the court- whether it is on administrative side or otherwise. We can join the committee to put forth...
Mishra: The bar council has no place to accomodate. They have to wait in sun, in rain. Then there is legal education programme. We have to train at home. We have no place- no seminars...
Singh: Please see BD Kauskik. They say that Supreme court is only Supreme court, high court is only high court. So the bar council members have no say.
AG: On administrative side, I may have that role- a little open. Bar council may also have a stand. I also feel that flexibility available , I can play my role better...
#ChiefJusticeofIndia DY Chandrachud to deliver a talk at the @IndiaToday Conclave on 'Justice in the Balance: My idea of India. And the importance of separation of powers in a democracy'.
On pendency, #CJI DY Chandrachud says, "We need greater efficiency...judge to population ratio skewed, lack of infrastructure in district judiciary main reasons."
#CJI DY Chandrachud: Our judiciary is based on the colonial idea that people have to access justice. But it must now give way to the idea of justice as an essential service that we must provide to our citizens.
Govt of India and #Delhi Govt cannot hide behind the veil of corporate personality especially when it comes to the discharge of binding obligations owed by the DMRC: Delhi High Court on payment of dues of an arbitral award to Reliance Infrastructure-owned DAMEPL. #DelhiMetro
In any case public policy demands that the veil be lifted and they be commanded to take appropriate steps to enable the DMRC to meet the obligations flowing from the award: Delhi High Court #DelhiMetro
The two shareholders are not mere individuals having a business interest in a corporate venture but sovereign governments in their own right. Governments cannot shirk from their liability to abide by binding judgments, decrees and awards: Delhi High Court
CJI DY Chandrachud: Where a state has more than one petitions, it would be open for the state to file one common petition. Time for filing of counter affidavit shall stand extended to three weeks.
Counsel: Your lordships may fix a date for completion of proceedings. Other states such as Maharashtra are trying to hop on the bandwagon- they're having daily processions for love jihad and what not. They're putting pressure.
#SupremeCourt hears Advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay's challenge to bail granted to Videocon Group Venugopal Dhoot. The Bombay HC had earlier rejected his intervention application and imposed cost on him.
CJI DY Chandrachud: How can you intervene in a bail application?
Counsel: Locus standi is foreign to criminal jurisprudence.
CJI DY Chandrachud: No but you're an advocate. How can you intervene? State can. If we entertain you, whole world will come to intervene in bail cases.
SG Tushar Mehta: We have moved an IA. There's 23,000 crores in the Sebi - Sahara account. IA seeks a prayer , from that account to have Rs 5000 crores moved to Central Registrar Co-operatives Society. We can utilise amounts which are lying idle.
Bench: In Sahara, there's a serious dispute...
SG: The society will check the genuineness of the depositor.
Bench: Where's the IA?
SG: Physical copy is not there. We had a meeting with all the departments and took this decision.