DMRC - Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited Dispute - Delhi High Court Directs Centre, Delhi Govt to forthwith attend to DMRC's request for extension of sovereign guarantee/ subordinate debt to enable it make payment of dues to Reliance Infra-owned DAMEPL.
Justice Yashwant Varma: The decision be taken within two weeks. If permission be accorded to the DMRC, it shall proceed to deposit the entire amount payable under the 2017 award along with the interest within a period of one month.
Justice Varma: If the Union or Delhi government decline the request, the union ministry shall forthwith revert and repatriate all monies received by it from DMRC post 10-03-2022. Upon receipt of the money, #DMRC shall transfer DAMEPL's dues to it.
In case DMRC fails to clear all outstanding amounts, the court reserves the right to frame appropriate directions against the Union ministry and GNCTD consequent to corporate veil having been duly lifted as per the findings recorded: Justice Varma.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#ChiefJusticeofIndia DY Chandrachud to deliver a talk at the @IndiaToday Conclave on 'Justice in the Balance: My idea of India. And the importance of separation of powers in a democracy'.
On pendency, #CJI DY Chandrachud says, "We need greater efficiency...judge to population ratio skewed, lack of infrastructure in district judiciary main reasons."
#CJI DY Chandrachud: Our judiciary is based on the colonial idea that people have to access justice. But it must now give way to the idea of justice as an essential service that we must provide to our citizens.
Govt of India and #Delhi Govt cannot hide behind the veil of corporate personality especially when it comes to the discharge of binding obligations owed by the DMRC: Delhi High Court on payment of dues of an arbitral award to Reliance Infrastructure-owned DAMEPL. #DelhiMetro
In any case public policy demands that the veil be lifted and they be commanded to take appropriate steps to enable the DMRC to meet the obligations flowing from the award: Delhi High Court #DelhiMetro
The two shareholders are not mere individuals having a business interest in a corporate venture but sovereign governments in their own right. Governments cannot shirk from their liability to abide by binding judgments, decrees and awards: Delhi High Court
CJI DY Chandrachud: Where a state has more than one petitions, it would be open for the state to file one common petition. Time for filing of counter affidavit shall stand extended to three weeks.
Counsel: Your lordships may fix a date for completion of proceedings. Other states such as Maharashtra are trying to hop on the bandwagon- they're having daily processions for love jihad and what not. They're putting pressure.
#SupremeCourt hears Advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay's challenge to bail granted to Videocon Group Venugopal Dhoot. The Bombay HC had earlier rejected his intervention application and imposed cost on him.
CJI DY Chandrachud: How can you intervene in a bail application?
Counsel: Locus standi is foreign to criminal jurisprudence.
CJI DY Chandrachud: No but you're an advocate. How can you intervene? State can. If we entertain you, whole world will come to intervene in bail cases.
SG Tushar Mehta: We have moved an IA. There's 23,000 crores in the Sebi - Sahara account. IA seeks a prayer , from that account to have Rs 5000 crores moved to Central Registrar Co-operatives Society. We can utilise amounts which are lying idle.
Bench: In Sahara, there's a serious dispute...
SG: The society will check the genuineness of the depositor.
Bench: Where's the IA?
SG: Physical copy is not there. We had a meeting with all the departments and took this decision.