Here is why you should learn about functionality of risk-ON/risk-OFF in #markets no matter what asset class you decide to #trade:
1.
It gives you foundations to good expectations. There is one pool of global capital that moves in and out of the risk offense or risk defense mode. You should know in what mode market is today to begin with and how it impacts your selected ticker of the day in focus.
2.
For example, if you decide to long equity ticker under severe selling pressure like $FRC the risk-ON flows have to cooperate, else your chances of longs working are going to be by default much smaller. The riskier the asset and the more liquid the more you need risk-ON mode.
3.
Meanwhile a very stable and robust positioned company as $NVDA currently doesn't need major risk-ON flows cooperation to hold stable or push. Example of ticker with very different profile to current situation.
4.
When you watchlist your tickers figure out if it is highly feeding of risk-ON/OFF because if so you should not trade against the current present flows. How to do that is a long story to explain well.
5.
Use $SPY, #gold, #bonds, #dollar to see where the trends are going before market open and then also in mid day if trends are still the same or changed. Is each asset class clearly in risk-ON or OFF? If so that should impact the trading plan of watchlisted tickers.
6.
From my observations and personal mistakes the common beginners error is not paying any attention to those flows and trying to create plan for traded tickers in ignorance of risk on/off mode. This increases randomness SIGNIFICANTLY.
7.
"Let me try to figure out what X tickers will do today regardless of cycle flows and whether markets are in risk ON or risk OFF today" is common mistake to creating watchlist plans that one can find for 70% of trading online content. Yep...70%+.
8.
This is where studying basic structure of global capital flows will do you a lot of good for your #trading. You will need to understand basics of currency or bond flows if you want better plan creation for your stock trades on daily basis.
9.
Operating in a bubble of your preferred market class with complete disregard to other asset classes is very common. To improve accuracy of asset directions and plans daily you need to separate yourself from that mainstream pitfall.
10.
You don't need to spend obsessive hours on studying that as long as your studying is structured well and you cover the flows dynamics as it should be (in and out and what triggers them). Good luck.
11.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Because the ranges are often limited the RR is tied and limited too. The weaker the cent range the less RR by default. If you try to place two, three, four+ trades on single ticker that impacts you. If you take only single big swing trade it doesn't.
2.
Many traders try to extract multiple separate trades from the movements of single ticker. This exposes you to behaviors. The weaker your read is the more you are impacted over long run negatively. Low RR trades and weak read leads to difficulty.
My aim over years has been to always seek for more efficient behavioral analysis tools and approaches that improve upon prior ones used. This means constant research on what to improve and optimize. Adding some improvement to watchlisting/planning/expectation weekly.
2.
Displace. Old methods are refined and improved or somethimes completely thrown out due to weak efficiency. That's ok. We all make mistakes by falling into perception some tools are much more accurate than they turn out to be half year later.
Some say recession won't come because too many see it ahead which is not normal.
Being contrarian is a skill, it requires careful calibration, let's break down some reasons why recession will likely come and dismissing it is not "black sheep" thinking at all:
1.
Recessions aren't signaled ahead, but depressions can be. This is what many are missing, we won't go into recession but more likely global depression crisis. Those come slowly and creep upon unlike recessions which strike fast. Recessions are more common unlike depressions.
2.
All past modern crisis events were recessions and therefore unexpected. Many use past two examples to build their whole reasoning on why we won't see crisis "because too many see it ahead". They are missing the fact that we are repeating older cycle from 30s and not 2008.
Shorting stuffed moves requires anticipation. For example ydays short on $BWEN 10:55, you need to focus on painted ranges (rigged) and be ready on what you need to see on tape to extract edge out of play like that (high tape velocity surge). #smallcaps
1.
This brings us to another point, the edge in tape:
-its not the size
-its velocity changes
Strong changes in velocity for few minutes reveal large participant agenda. Size of one big order does not reveal consistency or aggression persistence. It can easily be a spoof.
2.
Single order can always be a spoof, velocity change cannot be spoofed. Hard data priority. Another reason why you should always pay more attention to speed changes and absorbing rather than what sits on bid or ask.
$BIOR fails to do HOD clearout
$BWEN completes HOD clearout
Same type1 setup, different delivery. Recognizing the pattern is only first small step, edge extraction goes far beyond just pattern recognition and it's why it's a multi-year process often: #smallcaps#trading
1.
In smallcaps more than other markets you often have smaller ranges present which makes it more difficult on edge because the max RR is more capped. Details on how you execute setups start to matter a lot more because of that. This is absolutely key to understand.
2.
Figuring out through details which setup is bit more likely to fail vs the other matters because of low ranges. 5-10% add on failure recognition might matter over long run. It doesn't matter on high time frame setups where liquidity and range is great, but intraday...yes.
We live in era where everything is starting to get streamed. Most of the rigging is still done typically in secrecy. Over past 5 years it has been great learning experiment watching live stream process of actual rigging process performed from S. Bannon on macro side.
Why: 1.
To this point i have not seen any other known-by-name "heavy weight and still legal" who comes close to carrying the process so obviously and in the open. Its much quicker to learn about rigged stuff when its done from individual rather than just process (no-name) basis.
2.
Using Chief strategists of administrations for major powers to puppet master the presidents or whole cabinets is nothing new, has been done historically many times. But it is uncommon to see it done for public eye, if you know where to look. Podcasts, speeches, streams, etc.