Gender neutral/all user washrooms in #onted schools.
They've become the latest talking point in the attack on inclusive policies in schools.
If you'll be watching the #OCDSB meeting on Tuesday, you'll hear some things about them.
(1/15)
So let's talk about this, shall we?
First, for those who are unfamiliar with what "gender neutral" (I prefer "all user") washrooms look like in schools, for most schools they are repurposed staff/adult washrooms.
Single-user, separate from the existing multi-user washrooms, locking doors, sink in the room.
(2/15)
Who has permission to use an all user washroom?
> Anyone.
Who must use an all user washroom, by policy?
> No one.
All user washrooms are available for those who want them, but are not intended for one specific group of people.
(3/15)
Why might a student choose to use the all user washroom instead of one of the congregated/multi-user washrooms?
> Gender diverse and trans students
> Students seeking privacy
> Students with accessibility needs
> Students with medical needs
> etc.
(4/15)
A student may want to remove their hijab and fix their hair in a more private space than the multi-user washroom would afford.
A student may need the space and metal bars to assist with mobility needs.
A student may need to adjust medical devices.
(5/15)
All user washrooms are, as you might infer from the name, for anyone and everyone.
So, why are they the new battleground in the debate on trans-inclusive policies in schools?
Some "concerned parents" think that since these washrooms exist, trans kids should use them.
(6/15)
The concern, they say, is twofold:
> boys could abuse board self-ID policies to gain access to girls' spaces;
> girls are uncomfortable using the washroom with trans peers.
They say that trans kids should just use these all-user washrooms.
Boom! Solved! ...but is it?
(7/15)
I feel like I can't even touch the "boys will lie about being trans to get into girls' change rooms and bathrooms!" argument because it's so vile.
Boys aren't doing that, first off.
And if they were, the answer is to teach them better, not close inclusive spaces.
(8/15)
Let's look at the proposed solution: Trans and gender diverse kids can just use the all-user washroom.
Why would that be a problem?
Not all students want to use these washrooms. Some students feel that it's a way of being othered or forced to out themselves.
(9/15)
There are, whether you want to believe it or not, trans kids in our schools who socially transitioned before starting school and literally none of their peers know they are trans.
Forcing them to use the all-user washroom outs them.
(10/15)
Forcing trans students to use all-user washrooms also others them by implying two things: that their presence in another washroom makes others uncomfortable, and that they have no right to use the space designated for their gender. As if they're not REALLY that gender.
(11/15)
While I don't doubt there are some girls who are uncomfortable using the washroom with trans peers, the solution isn't to force trans & gender diverse students to out or other themselves so no one ever has to confront their (often unintentional) internalized transphobia.
(12/15)
The real solution to all of this, #onted, is education.
Students are only scared of sharing a washroom with trans kids because someone told them they should be.
Parents are only scared of boys lying to assault girls because someone told them it could happen.
(13/15)
The idea that trans kids should use the all-user washroom sounds reasonable on the surface, but the message it sends to those students is harmful.
They should always have the OPTION of using an all-user space, but not the REQUIREMENT.
The distinction is important.
(14/15)
Finally, if a student is genuinely uncomfortable sharing the washroom with one of their peers, they too have the option of accessing the all-user washroom.
Because the all-user washroom is for everyone.
(15/15)
Just kidding, one more thing. If you read all of this, cool. I know you're probably not the people who need to hear any of this.
But I hope this perhaps gave you some talking points you can use when disrupting this kind of transphobia in #onted.
If you’ve been following the rise of anti-trans and anti-queer rhetoric in school boards over the last few years, you’ve likely seen the “anti-woke” crowd accuse equity advocates of never being willing to debate.
The anti-woke crowd uses a lot of very charged, very evocative words in their arguments. They throw around words like sexuality, pornography, child abuse.
In an argument made in good faith, they’d back up these claims with two things: a definition and evidence.
"It was just the nickname, not the joining information."
The nickname IS the joining information. You don't need a link to join a Meet if it's been created with a nickname. You can enter the nickname and go directly to the meeting.
Ergo, Chanel shared joining information.
"They're locked to OCDSB accounts anyway, so no harm done."
Even if a meeting is locked down, non-OCDSB accounts can still request entry to the Meet. That could be abused by trolls to overwhelm hosts of meetings with requests to join, which play a sound and create a pop-up.
A candidate for #onted trustee who has taken a very public "anti-woke" stance publicly shared a board email which included info on how to join virtual meetings for marginalized students.
This is more than playing politics or a lapse in judgment. (1/5)
Making this information publicly available puts students and staff directly in harm's way.
There is no apology that will excuse this egregious disregard for student wellbeing.
The candidate should immediately withdraw from the race for the damage done with this. (2/5)
No one running for a position of stewardship and leadership in #onted should build their platform on the basis of stripping students of their safety.
The email very clearly stated that it was not to be shared, but this trustee candidate brushed that aside. (3/5)
Lately, I've done a lot of talking about the people running for office in #onted who want to remove existing supports for trans & gender diverse students.
Too much, to be honest.
What I should be talking about is how you can support these kids in your class.
HERE WE GO. (1/25)
It starts with the setup of your classroom. Some common things you should try to avoid:
❌"Boys" and "Girls" bathroom passes
❌Seating plans that are based on gender
❌Any kind of colour-coding or different designs for students based on gender
(2/25)
Start changing your language before day one. Find alternatives to addressing your class as "boys and girls" when you want their attention.
Some alternatives that don't reinforce an inaccurate gender binary:
✅Friends
✅Grade __
✅(class code)
✅Everyone
My children are playing "Spy Class Academy," a game they made up that could also for sure be an anime series or narrative video game.
I don't know how parents are expected to keep a straight face when their kids are playing make believe.
Correction: Spy Class Academy has undergone a name change and is now the Secret Control Agency.
They are liaising with field agents in the Mission Control Agency regarding an agent gone rogue.
Agent Spyglass (not to be confused with the earlier name of the agency): *GASP!* "Agent Chocolate! You were supposed to be on a mission to find a *mountain* goat, not a *snow* goat!"
Agent Chocolate, a cat, defensively: "Well I'm *sorry* but I don't know the *difference*!"
While I know now that my life is beautiful and fun and should be celebrated, I still face daily reminders that I am often seen as little more than a "controversial topic."