#SupremeCourt will today hear petition filed by Gujarat riots gangrape survivor, #BilkisBano challenging decision of Gujarat government to grant remission to 11 convicts who had gangraped her and murdered her family members during the 2002 Godhra riots… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Sibal: pleadings are complete and we can have arguments
Justice Joseph: what is the broad line of submission that you will take? since power under 432 has been excercised by state of gujarat.. did SC direct Gujarat to take a decision?
Gupta: the jurisdiction with the state here was Maharashtra and not gujarat. Here please look at the impact of the crime on the society... 8 minors were there in the crimes committed in this case
Adv Vrinda Grover: as per section 432 crpc sub section 2... the presiding judge of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Grover: there is a substantive default sentence as well involved.
SC: what is their criminal background..
Grover: while on parole the convicts have also been charged for molestation..
Convict counsel: we need to give time to file replies..
Justice Joseph: what about the state of Gujarat exercising the power without having the jurisdiction to do so? or just with the cloak of power? has the court held that it can act without jurisdiction? look at the Antulay case and how there was no jurisdiction and can SC cloak the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Malhotra: the straight answer is the Rupa Ashok Hurrah case..
Justice Joseph: in light of the appropriate govt used in section.. one is Union of India and the other is state of Gujarat. appropriate govt is defined... these are the issues which you can propose to answer... and… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Justice Joseph: this was a heinous offence and for murder cases convicts are languishing in jails without remission. so is this a case where the standards have been adopted uniformly in other cases also..
Justice Joseph: we are only on legal and law and nothing to do with emotions.
Malhotra: here everything happened in Gujarat on trial stage and it was transferred to Maharashtra for disposal. for premature release my client was going back and forth from Maharashtra and Gujarat.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Sr Adv AM Singhvi: under section 432(2) this court asks and gives weight to the opinion of the judge who has convicted.. please see what the judge wrote.. no weight given to him. the post release conduct has death threat to victim which has been brushed aside by the prosecution.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Sibal: here on public interest petitions... we are saying grounds of remission is alien to the statute and on this ground PIL will lie and we are not seeking prosecution. This court has to now lay down the broad contours of granting remission. this is not an ordinary case...… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Justice Joseph: notice has to be issued on the plea by the victim.
Justice Nagarathna: since notice is being issued it has to be issued in all the petitions now
Justice Joseph: Issue notice on the plea by Bilkis Bano to the state of Gujarat to Union of India. Adv Rishi Malhotra takes notice for convict no 3.
Justice Joseph: pleadings to be completed before the next date of the posting. Union and State of Gujarat to be ready with files relating to grant of remission before the next date of hearing.
#SupremeCourt hears a plea on uniform grounds of divorce, inheritance, guardianship, maintenance
SG Tushar Mehta: Uniform Civil Code is desirable. But this is a legislative aspect. Cannot be decided on a writ petition.
CJI DY Chandrachud: In substance petitioner seeks gender neutral and religion neutral laws in divorce, guardianship, inheritance, maintenance.. we have heard Mr Ashwini Upadhyay in person, Sr Adv Huzefa Ahmadi for an intervenor, and SG Mehta for the Union of India.
CJI: SG Mehta submits that as a matter of policy Centre does support UCC but such an intervention in these batch of cases can be only through the parliament. We are not inclined to entertain this under Article 32
The NCLAT will shortly pronounce its judgement on Google's plea challenging the CCI order imposing a penalty of Rs 1337 crores on the tech giant for allegedly misusing its dominant position in the Android ecosystem. #Google#NCLAT#CCI#Android@CCI_India
The judgment will be pronounced by a bench of NCLAT Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan and Dr Alok Srivastava, Member (Technical) at 2 PM.
#SupremeCourt hears a case where increasing number of FIRs being registered against Christians with increasing number of arrests without bail
Sr Adv Colin Gonsalves: nodal officers are notified per district and they are not registering a single cases. hate speeches are there in… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: it is easy to make sweeping statements..
Gonsalves: please see tehseen poonawalla judgment. nodal officer was to do their job
CJI DY Chandrachud: let MHA file a reply and collation of response by the MHA. We can keep this after two weeks… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Chattisgarh counsel: no notice has been issued on the petition. I can file an additional affidavit and what action have we taken on such instances.
CJI: we can have this case on April 14 and let us have a response from MHA and if in the interim something then we will see… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
#SupremeCourt hears a challenge to the Andhra Pradesh HC order rejecting plea by Ramoji Rao-led Eenadu publication seeking an ex parte ad interim direction to suspend the govt order regarding the subscription of Sakshi newspaper by the village and ward volunteers @eenadulivenews
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: Sakshi is 176 a month, Eenadu is 207 and the govt is ousting above 200
CJI DY Chandrachud: cannot the person decide which newspaper to purchase..
Rohatgi: these are all govt volunteers and supporters. All those who support the govt will get 200 in which… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Rohatgi: govt has also said that eenadu is yellow journalism and do not go for @Eenadu_Newspapr
Supreme Court to hear plea by Lakshadweep administration challenging Kerala HC order suspending conviction of NCP leader PP Mohd Faizal in attempt to murder case.
Sr Adv AM Singhvi: let me lessen your burden, after I filed a second writ today a notification has been issued that the disqualification has been withdrawn. It has taken them two months. nonetheless it can be disposed off now. then we will go to the SLP